The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Firearm-related Activities > The Ammo & Reloading Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-10-2009, 08:45 PM   #1
Teejay9
Advanced Senior Member
 
Teejay9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southwest Corner of the US, "Where no stinking fence will stop us!!"
Posts: 1,257
Default 9mm vs. .38 S&W

Like to ask a question. I was going through some loose ammo and I noticed that a 9mm and a .38 S&W were about the same size. The .38 has a bigger, heavier slug than the 9mm so why is it disdained? I don't hand load, so I'd appreciate some insight. I've fired both often and haven't noticed too much of a difference. I've had twice as many 9mms as the .38 S&W, so I know that the 9mms have better looking launchers, but is there really that big a difference? Thoughts, please. TJ

-->
Teejay9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 09:19 PM   #2
Alpo
Advanced Senior Member
 
Alpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,648
Default Re: 9mm vs. .38 S&W

The 38 S&W is, historically, loaded in break-top hinge-frame guns. Not very strong. So the 38 S&W ammo is loaded pretty weak. 38 S&W is loaded to around 10 or 11 thousand psi. 9mm Luger is loaded to around 30 to 35 thousand psi.

If you had a strong modern gun (and no one makes one), you could, theoretically, load 38 S&W to the same as the 9mm Luger 147 grain loads.
Alpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 07:40 AM   #3
army mp
V.I.P. Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: western Pa,
Posts: 479
Default Re: 9mm vs. .38 S&W

The 9MM is smaller in Diameter than the 38 Spl..356 the 38 is .357. some years ago Ruger made a Revolver called a convertible. That shot 9mm or 38s you used a moon clip for the 9mm but I have not seen one of these guns in years, saying that I would not recommend loading 38s up that hot. Experimenting with hot loads are how people get hurt
army mp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 04:12 PM   #4
Teejay9
Advanced Senior Member
 
Teejay9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southwest Corner of the US, "Where no stinking fence will stop us!!"
Posts: 1,257
Default Re: 9mm vs. .38 S&W

The .38 S&W guns I've owned are "modern." One was a Webley, c. 1947, a WW II S&W "Victory," and a H&R mod 926. They have handled 146 and 158 grain slugs without blowing up. I guess, with 116 grain slug, the 9mm would be faster out the gate but that larger piece of lead seems to be heavy enough to do damage. Alpo, I think you're right, they are probably loaded for those old H&Rs from the turn of the last century. Those I wouldn't attempt to shoot even if I came across one.
Teejay9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com