The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Member Discussions > The Constitutional & RKBA Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-21-2009, 01:20 PM   #1
armedandsafe
Former Guest
 
armedandsafe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moses Lake, WA
Posts: 10,344
Default Don't need no stinkin' States Rights

The Democrat Senators opposed to this surprised me. Senators Feinstein and Reid came out in opposition to the proposal.

Quote:
CNSNews.com
Senate Panel Okays Ban on Gubernatorial Appointments to Vacant Senate Seats
Friday, August 21, 2009
By Edwin Mora

(CNSNews.com) – An amendment to remove the constitutional right of governors to appoint individuals to U.S. Senate seats that become vacant in between elections was recently approved by a 5-to-3 vote in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution.

The resolution, which favors direct elections rather than gubernatorial appointments to unoccupied Senate seats as the Constitution requires, was introduced Jan. 29, following news of a pay-to-play scheme involving then-Illinois Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who is accused of scheming to sell President Barack Obama's former U.S. Senate seat.

Before introducing the amendment, Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, released a statement advocating an end to the constitutional right of Blagojevich-type appointments to Senate seats.

“The controversies surrounding some of the recent gubernatorial appointments to vacant Senate seats make it painfully clear that such appointments are an anachronism that must end,” said Feingold.

“In 1913, the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution gave the citizens of this country the power to finally elect their senators,” he said. “They should have the same power in the case of unexpected mid-term vacancies, so that the Senate is as responsive as possible to the will of the people.”

In Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution, dealing with members of the Senate, it states: “[I]f Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof [governor] may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies.”

The 17th Amendment to the Constitution reads: “When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.”

When asked about the pay-to-play scandal, Burris several times changed his story about how he was appointed. He finally admitted that at some point he was committed to raising money for the governor, but he also indicated that he failed in that endeavor.

Corruption accusations resulted in the impeachment and arrest of Blagojevich, who is currently facing trial on federal charges, and it also sparked an investigation into Burris’ role. Burris was appointed to the Senate seat three weeks after Blagojevich was arrested.

In July, Burris announced that he would not run for a full Senate term in 2010.

Feingold’s resolution to change the way open Senate seats can be filled garnered somewhat bi-partisan support, with backing from Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), as well as Mark Begich (D-Alaska).

By September, the Feingold proposal is supposed to reach full-committee consideration where it is expected to face opposition.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) recently told reporters that he is against the subcommittee’s proposition.

"I'm not in favor of our dictating to a state what it should do," said Reid. "We have a system now where some states have special elections and some have governors appoint.”

The Senate leader added: "In the state of Nevada the governor appoints. Even though we have a Republican governor now, I think that's the way it should be – so I don't support this legislation.”

Both Reid and Durbin attempted to deny Burris his Senate seat.

To be approved, the potential 28th constitutional amendment has to be supported by an overall congressional majority of two-thirds and also by three-quarters of the states. The 27th Amendment made it through in 1992, more than two centuries after it was submitted in 1789.

Republicans on the Senate Constitution subcommittee who voted against the measure include John Kyl (R-Ariz.) and John Cornyn (R-Texas), who was appointed by Texas Gov. Rick Perry in November 2002.

The only Democrat to vote against the resolution was the chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), while Sens. Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.) and Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) did not vote.

In support of Burris being appointed by then-Gov. Blagojevich to fill Obama’s vacant Senate seat, Feinstein said on Jan. 6: “Does the governor have the power, under law, to make the appointment? And the answer is yes. If you don't seat Mr. Burris, it has ramifications for gubernatorial appointments all over America ….”

Currently, governors, as the Constitution mandates, are permitted to designate a replacement for a vacant Senate seat in most states with only Alaska, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Feingold’s Wisconsin requiring a special election.

Besides Burris, out of the present senators, those who received gubernatorial appointments to fill-in for senators and who have subsequently been hired by the Obama administration are Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Kristen Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), and Ted Kaufman (D-Del.).

The Senate’s Web site reveals that 184 senators have been elected through gubernatorial appointments since 1913.

The Feingold amendment, formally known as S.J.Res.7, states:

“Section 1. No person shall be a Senator from a State unless such person has been elected by the people thereof. When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies.

“Section 2. This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as a part of the Constitution.”

-->
armedandsafe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 09:54 PM   #2
pickenup
Advanced Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 6,838
Default Re: Don't need no stinkin' States Rights

Well.....I'll be.
__________________
The gene pool needs chlorine
pickenup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2009, 11:04 PM   #3
bcj1755
Advanced Senior Member
 
bcj1755's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A wretched hive of scum and villiany
Posts: 4,357
Default Re: Don't need no stinkin' States Rights

What are Feinstein and Nevada Harry REALLY after?
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace, and revolution continue on forever.

Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges - Cicero

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams
bcj1755 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 01:55 PM   #4
GunHugger
Advanced Senior Member
 
GunHugger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW PA
Posts: 1,161
Default Re: Don't need no stinkin' States Rights

There must be a reason...other than them doing the right thing.
__________________
.
“There will be a revolution in this country!”


“I don’t believe people should to be able to own guns.”
~Barack Obama

"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here."
~Captain John Parker, to his Minute Men on Lexington Green, April 19, 1775.
GunHugger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 02:50 PM   #5
Trouble 45-70
Advanced Senior Member
 
Trouble 45-70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NE Ar. W. of Black River
Contributor
Posts: 2,703
Default Re: Don't need no stinkin' States Rights

Leave it as is. If the citizens of the States want to change then let them use the ballot initiative.
Trouble 45-70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 04:10 PM   #6
Rocket J Squirl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 418
Default Re: Don't need no stinkin' States Rights

See there is still some good acid left over from the 60s,

they musta be trippin
Rocket J Squirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com