|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 117
|
I was just thinking about the probable extension of the so-called assault weapons ban and was wondering if there wasn't something good that we could get out of it. Here is the situation as I see it. Bush will probably extend the ban because it would be political suicide in an election year not to do so. The supposed reason for the ban as put forth by the anti gunners is, in broad terms, public safety. Why don't we take them at their word and accecpt the renewal of the ban, grudgingly of course, but only after we insist on a few new clauses--just to make the nation safer of course. For example, what about a clause that states clearly that local or state laws cannot override the second ammendment. That would mean no state or local laws like Kalifornia and Taxachusetts, or bans on things like folding stocks as in Cleveland or merely owning high capicity magazines as in Cincinnati. This way everyone knows the rules, they are clear and eazy to follow. Another clause we could insist they add to make the nation safer would be another amnesty for NFA weapons. This clearly is a safety issue--wouldn't the anti's rather know what is out there than not know and wouldn't there be a few people who would be happy for another amnesty? And then what about a clasue that would allow interstate transportation of an inherited collection of firearms. As it stands now it is almost impossible for an individual to retrieve a collection left to him or her from some states. They end up going through a dealer, often at great expense. In the name of safety of course, there could be some provision for the CLEO in the new owners jurisdiction to be notified or some such thing. Finally, what about a provision that would allow anyone who legally owns a firearm (long gun or hand gun) to send it to a licensed dealer, gunsmith or manufacturer through the mail. It's clearly safer to permit it and control it than to make it illeagle and have people try to get around it. See, I'm just concerned about all our safety. Well, it's all just a thought. Just a hope that maybe we could get something out of what otherwise appears to be the inevitable. Your thoughts?
-->
Last edited by sck; 04-30-2003 at 01:47 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Adnanced Senior Member
Posts: n/a
|
The way politics work in Congress, when it comes back up for renewal, all sorts of baggage will likely be tacked on it from various parties - such as a requirement that all chickens have their nose hairs plucked twice per month.
Now this may be a good thing; with enough baggage tacked on, it will never pass. Welcome back Steve, long time no see! |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paint Rock Valley, Alabama
Posts: 3,147
|
Welcome to TFF sck! Glad to see you here.
__________________
You can call Don, You can call me Tuck, Just don't call me late for suppa! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: southcentral, PA
Posts: 267
|
Political suicide NOT to renew?
Didn't Bush wine because the majority of gun owners were behind him. It would be political suicide if he does renew the bill Just my $.02 By the way, welcome to TFF.
__________________
My Website Last edited by outdoorsman260; 04-30-2003 at 07:48 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Adnanced Senior Member
Posts: n/a
|
Hello sck and welcome.
danged if you do, and danged if you don't... I suppose, it'll be a crap shoot. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paint Rock Valley, Alabama
Posts: 3,147
|
Well, if it is political suicide for Bush, then who the hell will we vote for in 2004? If Bush does renew, then conservatives better come up with a good replacement fast. I definitely will not vote for any of the primary candidates I'm seeing so far. Especially not a national level Democrat.
__________________
You can call Don, You can call me Tuck, Just don't call me late for suppa! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,138
|
Welcome to TFF, sck.
I agree with outdoorsman260. It is political suicide for Bush to support renewal of the ban. He's attempting to throw a bone to the Democrats, and it's going to end up costing him a second term. We gun owners need to send a clear message that you don't barter our rights for political gain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
*TFF Admin Staff Mediator*
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Minn-eeee-sota, ya, sure, you bet!
Posts: 9,144
|
Hi sck....welcome to TFF.
It's always nice to see new members posting their opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moses Lake, WA
Posts: 10,344
|
OK, here is a thought. Let's _really_ do something for the safety of Americans.
Using the same criteria and scientific studies which were used to pass the "It's a Crime, Bill," let's add a clause that _anything_ proved as or more unsafe than firearms be also banned. Now there is a case of unintended consequences waiting to happen. ![]() No more 5-gallon buckets? No swimming pools? Of course,,,,no cars. It's for the children, doncha know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sitting at my computer
Posts: 1,581
|
Steve! Dang good to see ya posting again. Nothin' like jumpin' in with both feet on yer first post!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Adnanced Senior Member
Posts: n/a
|
Hi there sck! Glad your here finally, and like .280 said you stepped right up to the plate.
![]() |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 117
|
Thanks for all your warm welcome folks.
I'm right there with you regarding the lack of support from the Bush administration. The basic problem is, as you have pointed out, the Rep. Party knows that we have no where else to go. Yes, we could vote Libertarian, but in a presidential race there is no realistic hope for a third party candidate right now. The real question is whether we are just going to complain and gripe or be clever enough to get something positive out of this. Politics can be defined as the search for power, and if we can get something that we want from an otherwise bad situation, then we have gained at least some power. So the questions are: 1. do we simply complain about being sold out or taken for granted again or do we conceive a strategy that gets us something, and 2. if we're going to put forward a strategy that will get something, how do we go about it--letters to sympathetic members of congress? NRA? other? Thanks again folks. I sure would like to hear some more comments and creative ideas from you folks that may be able to turn out something from a bad situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: "Gun Culture Members Clubhouse"...
Posts: 4,463
|
I want to give you a "BIG" TFF Welcome!...next...Number two works the best!...
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|