|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 577
|
I've got a 2.25" SP101 that I carry concealed, and was wondering about the effectiveness of .38+P ammo compared to that of .357 ammo. Any pertinent thoughts or data ? I currently carry .357 Hydrashocks.
__________________
Change...it's all you'll have left in your pocket by 2013.
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 4,799
|
This is all the info I have on it. http://www.snubnose.info/docs/38-snub_vs_357-snub.htm
__________________
Nothing posted on TheFirearmsForum.com constitutes legal, accounting, gunsmithing, or other professional advice. Readers are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals for real advice. Your life is lived at your own risk. Don't blame me for the dumb things you do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 577
|
That was what I was looking for. Thanks Josh. I guess I will stick with the hydrashocks. I did some very informal testing at the range this morning and shot through 2- 250 page phone books with both .38 handloads and .357 handloads, but all that did was reafirm the fact that I wouldn't want to get hit with either a .38 or a .357 !
__________________
Change...it's all you'll have left in your pocket by 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indiana
Contributor
Posts: 4,799
|
Quote:
Yeah, I'm with you. We can talk all day about with hits harder, and there are definitely cases in which the .357 is effective and the .38 would not be, but I certainly don't want to be the test subject.
__________________
Nothing posted on TheFirearmsForum.com constitutes legal, accounting, gunsmithing, or other professional advice. Readers are encouraged to consult with qualified professionals for real advice. Your life is lived at your own risk. Don't blame me for the dumb things you do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2
|
I just my two cents from a new member:
I live in a metropolitan area with car-jacking/road rage risks. I consider the "overpenetration factor" with a 357 magnum round in addition to the repeat (db noise level) in a small enclosed space. I also own a 2.25" barrel SP101 and get supersonic (approx 1120 fps = speed of sound) velocity from the 357 Magnum Hydra Shok rounds I've fired at the range. This adds more of a loud supersonic "crack" to what is already a brutally high db level of the typical 357 magnum round. The 38 +P rounds such as Winchester DPX1 (Supreme Elite) and Speer Gold Dot SB 130 grain bolded JHP's provide great expansion at SUBsonic velocity (850-900 fps for these rounds) with far less risk of permanent hearing loss. Consider the environment in which you are most likely to discharge your weapon in SD. That being said, when I travel on the highway on road trips or plan to be in a more open space like the woods, etc. I load her with magnum rounds. I figure that if confronted on a trip, I may be engaging an attacker from outside the vehicle in a less populated scenario. Just my preference. Check out this site for more info on db levels of various rounds. http://www.freehearingtest.com/hia_gunfirenoise.shtml Hope this helps. Either way, I would suggest you look into ammo designed for short barrel guns . Buffalo Bore (BB also does great 357 magnum rounds for short barrel) 38 +P low flash/low recoil for short barrel, Win PDX1 38 +P and Speer Gold Dot 38 +P for Short Barrel are two very good choices. Your db levels, recoil and muzzle flash will be minimized with plenty of expansion of the bullet in soft tissue. Last edited by qcsmitty; 11-12-2010 at 09:02 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
Last edited by qcsmitty; 11-12-2010 at 09:00 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SW Fort Worth
Contributor
Posts: 4,888
|
Quote:
+1 to that; planning as best as possible for the most feasible scenario is what will ensure one's best outcome. Can't cover all the bases, but it pays to think about it. I think you nailed it, it isn't just a 38 vs 357 ballistics issue, it's more about what you anticipate running into.
__________________
. What are you gonna do, talk the alien to death? -- (on Sigourney Weaver's worry about Guns in Aliens) "Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands." "I carry a small gun to compensate for my huge Blue press." ![]() . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 577
|
Maybe I should be, but I'm not too worried about the db level of various rounds. If there is a life on the line, that's the last thing I'm worried about. Sometimes I think I'm half deaf anyway...wait, no, I just don't listen to anybody ! LOL I just saw some .38+P ammo at WalMart one day and thought about purchasing them instead of driving 40 miles to my favorite gun store, but I'll need some stuff for my annual winter reloading session anyway. I'm going to stick with the hydrashocks and hope I never have to use them.
__________________
Change...it's all you'll have left in your pocket by 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 269
|
I would agree that with that gun, the highest power is the best option. I had an SP in .38, and worked up a load with the Sierra 180 gr. HC round for about 850 fps. Accuracy was horrible, and power was just not what I expect from a SD gun. I gave it away.
__________________
Around here, we don't say "Oh shucks", or "oh man". We say Oh BAMA!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DAV, Deep in the Pineywoods of East Texas, just west of Shreveport, LA
Contributor
Posts: 11,552
|
I also own an SP101. I love the gun with .38's in it, but hate it with the full mag loads. I can't hit anything with it, and the muzzle blast is horribile, not to mention the recoil! Try shooting it at night! It will leave you blind for several seconds, and that's just not acceptable to me. I reload, so the .357 rounds I reload are reduced loads, that's for plinking. For SD I won't use the reloads, and there is nothing on the market that will get the .357 down to acceptable levels. Bottom line for me is this: I also own a .38 snubie, and this gun is much lighter than the SP 101, so the recoil is greater. The felt recoil in the Ruger with .38's is much less than with the Off Duty, but the Ruger is heavier to carry. The Ruger has become my car gun, loaded with .38+P's, when I am in it, with my .45, or my .44 as a CCW, or home gun. Along with my NAA in .22 Mag as a BUG.
__________________
Y'all be safe now, ya hear!Lamentations Chapter 5: 1. Remember, O LORD, what is come upon us: consider, and behold our reproach. 2. Our inheritance is turned to strangers, our houses to aliens. 3. We are orphans and fatherless, our mothers [are] as widows. 5. Our necks [are] under persecution: we labour, [and] have no rest. 16. The crown is fallen [from] our head: woe unto us, that we have sinned! 21. Turn thou us unto thee, O LORD, and we shall be turned; renew our days as of old. Last edited by carver; 11-17-2010 at 06:17 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Henderson, Nevada
Posts: 656
|
Good info. A lot depends on the ammo and slug type, The barrel length, and if you want to shoot engine blocks or not. lol
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|