|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: reno
Contributor
Posts: 323
|
http://secondcitycop.blogspot.com/
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moses Lake, WA
Posts: 10,344
|
Quote:
Pops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,471
|
Citizens of Illinois need to contacts thier reps to let them know the feelings about our constitution and bill of rights...
__________________
"You shall recieve power" Acts 1:8 W |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oklahoma by birth. America by the grace of God.
Posts: 649
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The cost of freedom, is eternal vigilance. The cost of bondage, is your life. - mtnboomer Support the Second Amendment - Join the NRA! > http://www.nra.org < Oklahoma State - #1 - GO POKES! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The grand old state of North Carolina
Posts: 492
|
Boutique Gun Store sounds like one of those places people would get a pink Hello Kitty gun, or maybe where those Mexican Cartel guys(if you can call them guys) went to put all those diamonds on their guns.
__________________
It's not the size, it's the placement of the bullet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Moses Lake, WA
Posts: 10,344
|
I'm not sure why so many of you are so concerned that the owner of a gun store wants to call it a "Boutique." Are guns any less effective or interesting because the name of the store makes you uneasy? Is it unseemly that a store wants to carry only the finest and most beautiful guns?
Let's look at the definition from a business standpoint. This is from businessdictionary.com. It is the definition of a business living up to the definition. Quote:
Just my thoughts and worth almost as much as you paid to read them. ![]() Pops Last edited by armedandsafe; 07-11-2010 at 06:12 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South Alabama
Posts: 268
|
How many lawsuits will it take for the political leaders in Chicago (or anywhere else) to see that they are denying American citizens of their rights? How much taxpayer money are they willing to spend on legal fees to defend their tyranical laws? How much longer will they continue to burden an already over-burdened court system with their Draconian laws just to prove a point that has already been proven that they are wrong? But the REAL question is: How much longer will the citizens of Chicago (or anywhere else) continue to allow their elected leaders to squander their taxes, deny them of their rights, and over burden their court system before they run them out of office?
__________________
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774_1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NE Ar. W. of Black River
Contributor
Posts: 2,703
|
lawdawg, the cost of these lawsuits is picked up by the taxpayer. Now if the loss of the lawsuits came out of the pockets of the politicians, I think that there would be a lot fewer attacks on the Constitution. Don't see a lot of likelihood of that though. The Illinois Constitution needs a change to offer better protection for the citizens against the criminal element and politicians but then I am being redundant.
__________________
Psalm 12 verse 8: The wicked walk on every side when the vilest men are exalted. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|