The Firearms Forum - Gun Community  
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address.

Go Back   The Firearms Forum - Gun Community > Member Discussions > The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorrect Forum

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2010, 06:09 PM   #1
Marlin T
Advanced Senior Member
 
Marlin T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 7,857
Thumbs down New PTSD program HEAR YE HEAR YE

Hear Ye Hear Ye


Welcome to our new and improved mandatory gun take away program!

We have decided that our current goal of about 1/3 of the
2 million Iraq and Afghanistan vets wasn't enough people disarmed. Therefore; please feel free to participate in our new and improved PTSD program.

If you say you have it, we will now believe you. Come on down for your new mental health eval!

We EVEN have the NRA's endorsement, thank you NRA.

____________________________________________
Rules aim to make it easier for veterans to claim benefits for PTSD.



Reporting from Washington —
A new Department of Veterans Affairs policy that takes effect Tuesday aims to make it easier for veterans to receive benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder, a medically recognized condition in which symptoms include a lack of emotion, flashbacks and bad temper. The VA simplified the claims process, reducing the evidence veterans must supply if the claim involves fear of military or terrorist activity and corresponds with the nature of their service.

How is the policy changing?

Previously, noncombat veterans had to convince claims adjudicators that they were traumatized by a specific event with incident reports, statements from their peers or other evidence. Rep. John Hall (D-N.Y.) said the VA will now "presume that veterans are telling the truth." Under the new rule, veterans can receive disability benefits for PTSD if a VA psychiatrist finds that the traumatic event recalled by a veteran bolsters a PTSD diagnosis. Veterans who feared trauma will also be eligible for PTSD benefits, even if they did not experience the event.



Why is the policy changing?

Military officials say documenting the experiences that provoke PTSD is not always possible. "We made [veterans] jump through hoops to get this well-deserved benefit," said Michael Walcoff, the VA's acting undersecretary for benefits.

Hall said the new policy is necessary in light of the new ways wars are waged, without a clearly defined front line.

Who will benefit from the change?

Veterans who were denied PTSD benefits under the old rule are encouraged to reapply. Service members whose claims are pending are entitled to retroactive benefits from the date they applied.

The new rule may prove especially beneficial to women in the armed forces, Hall said. Women are not permitted to serve in combat roles, so they had to satisfy a higher burden of proof to receive benefits for PTSD under the old rule.

How much will this cost?

Military officials said the added expenses will be minimal and the cost of increased claims may be offset by the time saved. Under the old rule, veterans spent months or years trying to get benefits, and the process was also time consuming for VA employees, Walcoff said.

Veterans diagnosed with PTSD are entitled to monthly payments of up to $2,700. With 20,000 mental health professionals and more than 100 PTSD treatment centers in place, the VA should be able to handle increased claims, Walcoff added.

How much will claims increase?

Military officials said they could not predict how much claims might rise, but they suspect the old rule deterred many veterans from applying for disability benefits.

Almost one in five service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan reported symptoms of PTSD or depression, but nearly half had not pursued treatment, according to an April 2008 study by the Rand Corp. More than 400,000 veterans currently receive benefits for PTSD.
__________________

"But the simple truth--born of experience--is that tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people."
Judge Alex Kozinski - United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government.
- Thomas Paine

Did you read todays GOOD shooting?
>>>KEEPANDBEARARMS.COM <<<

-->
Marlin T is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.

STILL SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING? TRY THE TFF "GOOGLE" SEARCH ENGINE BELOW!
Google

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, TheFirearmsForum.Com