|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The grand old state of North Carolina
Posts: 492
|
I feel kind of foolish for asking this. How does a gun get the label 'pre-ban.'
__________________
It's not the size, it's the placement of the bullet.
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 8,667
|
In 1994, Clinton signed into law the "Assault Weapons Ban", which outlawed several guns based on the way they looked. Folding stocks, for example, were considered evil, as were bayonet lugs. But guns made before the ban were grandfathered in, and the law did not effect them. Gun makers modified the way their guns looked, so they were in accordance with the new law.
So my brother's Springfield M1A (semi-auto version of the military M14), made in 1986, looks just like the military rifle, including having a bayonet lug. Mine, made in 1997, looks the same, except there is no bayonet lug. Bayonet lugs were available, but it was illegal to put one on my gun. His gun, being "pre-ban", had no such restriction. He could put a folding stock on his gun, or a stock with a pistol grip. I couldn't. The ban (which was a Federal law) only lasted ten years, so after 2004 it pretty much didn't matter any more. Some states, however, passed their own versions of the law, and even though the Federal law has gone away, they still have their law.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy, and taste good with catsup - George of Lod, Year of Our Lord 297 I always take precautions. Beware the Evil Bullet Fairies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3
|
As of 2004, Pre-Ban means nothing as it is a legal term under an expired federal statute.
Prior to 2004, but after 1994, certain firearms with certain cosmetic characteristics were prohibited from new production and sale to the general public, as president Clinton felt that the physical appearance of a firearm somehow made it more leathal than a "conventional" firearm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,853
|
Check your state's laws too.
Here in NY, they continued the ban - making it permanent. ![]()
__________________
The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." - Thomas Jefferson RESISTANCE IS FEUDAL... PREPARE TO SERVE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NorthWest Florida
Posts: 923
|
Quote:
Only when Repubs are returned to power in those states will the bad laws get deleted.
__________________
Marlin Specialist Calico Specialist A gun should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 151
|
Anyone know what the wonderful state of Connecticut has for laws? everything else here sucks, so im assuming the worse.
__________________
Long time Marine, Novice pistol shooter, First time 1911 owner and proud of it. Looking for advice and tips on it all. Going to war without the French is like going hunting without an accordian, you leave a lot of useless noisey bagage behind - Donald Rumsfeld |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,853
|
Quote:
http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbys...gunlaws_ct.htm via Google, 0.29 seconds. ![]()
__________________
The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." - Thomas Jefferson RESISTANCE IS FEUDAL... PREPARE TO SERVE. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|