|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3
|
I received a hand me down 1943 Remington Rand from my grandfather with the only marking being a number of 132 on the right side. Left side has Remington Rand Inc, Syracuse,NY, USA. My understanding this may have been a demonstration model for the company. Is there any way to determine if this was a demonstration model who was it presented to (number 132 must tell us something). Any confirmation on the demonstration model story being true would be welcome.
Appears to have never been fired. No rust. Any information would be appreciated. BBQFISH
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SW Fort Worth
Contributor
Posts: 4,884
|
Have any pics? Does it function and have you fired it?
__________________
. What are you gonna do, talk the alien to death? -- (on Sigourney Weaver's worry about Guns in Aliens) "Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands." "I carry a small gun to compensate for my huge Blue press." ![]() . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Florida
Contributor
Posts: 2,386
|
Ser#s from 1-17250 are 1912 Colts and then there is Remington UMC 1918 with Ser#s from 1-13152. Odd. There was alot of mixing of parts back then.
In 1943 the R/R Ser#s ranged from 916405-1041404 and then 1279699-1441430 and 1471431-1609528.
__________________
![]() New England Patriots Rule ![]() Next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
Where are the markings you mention? Is the "Remington Rand" on the slide and the serial number on the frame?
If so, what other marks are there on the frame? Could be that it is a built gun with an after-market frame. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
It is possible. According to Clawson, Remington-Rand made some demonstration guns numbered from 1 to about 145. That is aside from the approximately 100 experimental guns with "ERRS" numbers.
Those guns were not numbered in the R-R government numbering series that GunClinger cites, were not marked as U.S. Property, and were not delivered to the government. They were later presented to employees and officers of the company. If possible, can your grandfather document how he came by the gun, if he was a R-R employee or got it from someone who was. This is a case where there is a high possibility of fakery, so any documentation will be very valuable. If genuine and documented, I would WAG the value at $10000, maybe more. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3
|
Here are some pics of the gun and the markings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,487
|
Whoa, what are those grind marks to the rear of trigger, factory or did someone try and make it more user friendly?
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Florida
Contributor
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() New England Patriots Rule ![]() Next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Florida
Contributor
Posts: 2,386
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() New England Patriots Rule ![]() Next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
The book is Collector's Guiide to Colt .45 Service Pistols, Models of 1911 and 1911A1 , by Charles W. Clawson. The latest (AFAIK) is the Third Edition.
I don't know where your grandfather got the gun, but if it was claimed to be an R-R demonstrator, it is almost certainly a fake. There are a number of reasons for saying that: 1. The slide marking is of the second type, not likely to have been used on a demonstration model. 2. The Parkerizing is too good, even for a pistol that did not see service. 3. The Parkerizing is post-WWII; it is the wrong color for WWII Parkerizing, and the frame and slide don't match. 4. The slide markings are shallow and blurred, characteristic of a slide that has been polished down to remove rust, then Parkerized. 5. The machining on the frame does not match any WWII production M1911A1; the frame could be Brazilian. 6. The stocks are Colt; R-R used Keyes grips. 7. The numbering is crude and out of line; R-R did a better job even on the demo guns. Better pics would probably turn up more discrepancies, but I think that is enough. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Florida
Contributor
Posts: 2,386
|
http://www.coolgunsite.com/images/19..._remington.htm
Just found this. Wish I could find that Clawson book.
__________________
![]() New England Patriots Rule ![]() Next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
In recent years, 1911 frames made overseas have shown up in the U.S. They either have no markings or a very lightly stamped number, which is easily removed. The "R-R demonstrator" makes a perfect story for those guns. Any number up to 150 can be put on, no other markings are needed. R-R slides are fairly common, so the two can be combined into something of more value than the parts alone.
The one shown on coolgunsite shows all the characteristics of the OP's gun, including the late R-R address, and has a GI shipping box, which is itself a fake. Further, why would a demo have a shipping box with a stock number on it. They were never shipped, and never belonged to the government. IMHO, both guns are fake. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SW Florida
Contributor
Posts: 2,386
|
Rats! I thought I was onto something there.
![]()
__________________
![]() New England Patriots Rule ![]() Next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3
|
This gun has been in my grandfathers safe since 1960.
We're they faking them since the 1960's? He is since passed away so I have no way to determine where or how he came into it's possession. I am working family to determine any knowledge they may have about this gun. Thanks for all of the information. I will keep researching. BBQFISH |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
AFAIK, they were not faking those guns in the 1960's because the frames were not available, but sometimes family stories do get confused over the years. As I said before, documented proof that such a gun is what it is purported to be would be necessary, otherwise it is simply a R-R slide on a frame of dubious origin. If I am wrong, I will readily admit it, but it will take some hard evidence.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Contributor
Posts: 1,470
|
Often I have to tell someone that their grandfather's knife, that he carried in WW2, was made by a company that started business in 1957. Memories are not reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 542
|
The only thing Clawson's books mention is about test of all models of Ithaca, Rem Rand, US&S copies of Colt's 1911A1 is the inter changeability of parts in the guns. All guns had to prove reliability to function correctly with parts selected at random from all the other samples. If your gun started life as a Remington Rand someone made changes to it along the way.
Here is a picture of various guns frame markings. I have only one RR left in my collection and the picture is not to swift as it was from the days of 35 mm film, not digital, and it is marked with British proofs when it traveled thru that country to the States. Sorry for the late answer to your question, but I've been away, one might say. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL
Posts: 1,443
|
I used to have a ''lunchbox gun'' that no numbers on it because it was hobbled together at the factory with '' a part from here and a part from there''. They do exsist the numbers just look kinda fishy.
__________________
MORS DE CONTACTUS-DEATH ON CONTACT |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
While there were undoubtedly "lunchbox" guns, I have come to believe that the term is most often an excuse for any kind of mismatched pistol, with an odd frame or one with the serial number and markings illegally removed. By saying it is a "lunchbox" gun, the seller avoids the issue of removing or altering the serial number (there would never have been one) while asking a price that the gun would not justify as a jumble of parts.
Jim |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|