|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
|
I foud this gun in a home I bought. I know the gentleman served as a merchant marine during WWII. This was his service piece. Just trying to find out how rare it is, and what the value might be on it. Based on the serial number, it appears it was produced between 1912 and 1915. Any help is appreciated. Go to the link below for pictures.
http://picasaweb.google.com/10467401...9034/Colt1911#
-->
Last edited by seahawkfan43; 02-19-2011 at 06:41 PM.. Reason: forgot picture link |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,487
|
It is indeed a Colt 1911, Army issue, and it could have very well been used in WWI. ( WW II used the 1911A1 ). It is very desirable, even with the minor pitting and finish problem. Go to the Culvers Shooting Page Forums and post the same question under the 1911 forum. You have experts on that forumm who can tell what the weather was like on the day your gun was built.
http://www.jouster.com/forums/ Value I think you will be pleasantly surprised. Why is it every house I've ever bought , the only thing I every found was cock roaches? ![]()
__________________
RonJames |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
*Administrator*
Join Date: Feb 2001
Contributor
Posts: 8,755
|
Your Colt was produced in 1913 for US Navy issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,487
|
Thanks Shooter 45, And that makes it even more desirable. If it was assigned to a ship, John Holbrook might even be able to tell you which one ( Culvers Shooting Page ).
__________________
RonJames Last edited by RJay; 02-19-2011 at 09:54 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
|
When I originally looked it up by its serial number, it showed that it was issued to the USS New York. Just wasn't fully sure what I had on my hands. I will post it on the other site too. Any other info I can get will be helpful. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 68
|
Good gosh that's beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
|
Thanks for all the help. I really appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
At the time the Model 1911 was adopted, the Navy was still doing its own small arms procurement, and they demanded a "piece of the action" on the new auto pistol. So Colt made some 31,000 M1911 pistols marked U.S. NAVY. Later, (I don't have the exact date) Congress designated the Army as the lead military department for small arms and (with some exceptions), specially marked Navy or Marine Corps guns ceased. (There were NO M1911 or M1911A1 pistols marked "U.S.M.C." Those seen from time to time are fakes, no matter what the story is.)
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
|
I have a Colt 1911 Navy that I am looking to sell and have never done a private sale in person or online before and was looking for some help or guidance. Was also looking for some help in determining the value of this gun. So here is what I have:
US Navy issued Colt 1911. From the research that I have done, it was manufactured in 1913 and assigned to they USS New York for WWI. I do not know if this gun was actually used during the war or not. I do know however that this gun was used in WWII. I received this gun from a gentleman who was a Merchant Marine during WWII and this was his service piece. He served on a gas tanker in the South Pacific that serviced the Navy ships during the war. It does have some rust damage and pitting to it, but given the fact that it is 100 years old and served in 1, possibly 2 wars, that should almost be expected. I took it to Cabelas to see if they could give me a value on it, and while they dismantled it and confirmed everything was either original or period correct on the gun, they said it was so unique that it would be hard to put a value on it. So now I am here looking for your help. If you either know the value of this gun, or have suggestions on the best way to go about selling it, I would love to hear from you. Follow this link http://picasaweb.google.com/10467401...9034/Colt1911# to see pictures of the gun. Thanks in advance for your time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,962
|
You've got a very valuable gun there. Could easily fetch over $10k. I'd contact a reputable auction house such as Christies http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/s...lectedids=8919 . I would not put it up on Ebay or any other on-line auction site.
Also, if you haven't already done so, I'd contact Colt http://www.coltsmfg.com/CustomerServ...eServices.aspx directly to obtain records of this gun, and possible the USN http://www.history.navy.mil/research...llections.html as well to see if they can provide additional info. If you could find the name of the individual on board the NewYork who was issued this pistol it would go a long way towards increasing the value. PS: Don't be in a hurry to sell it. The value of it has no place to go but up. PPS: There should also be some Inspectors Mark on it somewhere. You can match that up to the inspectors name, etc. here: http://proofhouse.com/cm/us_inspector.htm Last edited by GunnyGene; 01-14-2013 at 01:59 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Florida
Contributor
Posts: 8,086
|
Wow, how did you arrive at that number?
__________________
I own a bunch of scary guns. You want em? Come and take em..... Liberalism is a serious, non curable, mental disorder... NRA LIFE MEMBER Oath Keepers Member NRA Certified Instructor 30 Yr CC permit holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
When the Model 1911 was first adopted by the Army, the Navy didn't want to be left out so the two services agreed to take turns buying them. The Army would buy some, then the Navy. After the Army got some 35,000, the Navy got 7000, marked "U.S. Navy." This continued through 1912, then it was agreed that the Army would buy the guns and they would be marked "U.S. Army"; the other services would obtain them from the Army. (None were ever marked originally "U.S.M.C."; those that exist are fakes of recent origin.)
Since Colt was marking slides without knowing for sure which service they would go to, they stamped them all "MODEL OF 1911," and left the rest blank. When they were sure just which service would get that shipment, they added "U.S. ARMY" or "U.S. NAVY". That is why, if you look closely you will see that the "U.S. NAVY" marking is in a different font than the model marking. The gun appears to be original and correct. Unfortunately, it is not in good condition. That would be partly compensated for if it is possible to get a notarized statement from the man who carried it in the Pacific giving his record and that it was issued to him. Even as is, I would value that gun at around $3000; were it in much better shape, it would be at least double that, but a proof of its story should add a couple of thousand. (Sorry, but without some documentary proof, it is just another story, and the old adage "buy the gun, not the story" applies.) Jim Last edited by Jim K; 01-14-2013 at 01:49 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,408
|
I have U.S. Navy #796 in about 90% and if anyone wants to give me $12,000 they can have it.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,962
|
Just for fun, let's say that Seahawks 1911 was issued to the Captain of BB-34:
Here's some names and history of the ship: Quote:
Last edited by GunnyGene; 01-14-2013 at 02:50 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,962
|
This needs to be merged with the other one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Contributor
Posts: 1,412
|
Quote:
Rather beat up, but seein we're so close I'll give ya $2,000 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Michigan
Contributor
Posts: 1,412
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Florida
Contributor
Posts: 8,086
|
Aint no way that gun is worth 10 grand.
__________________
I own a bunch of scary guns. You want em? Come and take em..... Liberalism is a serious, non curable, mental disorder... NRA LIFE MEMBER Oath Keepers Member NRA Certified Instructor 30 Yr CC permit holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
According to the serial number lists for the 1911 the USS New York guns were in serial range 43801 to 43900. The one shown falls in the earlier USN block of 38001 to 43800. So unless the owner can document ownership by someone on the New York, the connection isn't there. Even with such documentation it is not one of the 100 sent to the NY.
Still a desirable piece, just not quite as rare. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 238
|
My Navy experiece is much later than USS New York. But personal weapons were not assigned to individuals, nor did they routinely carry them. They were under the control of a chief gunner's mate, and issued only when required, perhaps for a few hours for training. I think it is hopeless to identify who that 1911 might have been issued to, probably not to any one particular person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,962
|
I'm pretty sure that at least the ships officers would have their sidearms permanently assigned to them while they were ships company, even if they were stored in the armory. The senior officers would have kept theirs in their quarters most likely. If they transferred to another boat they would have been issued/assigned a new weapon by their new command.
The USMC did that for the first few years I was in - up to the early 70's. The weapons were kept in the unit armory for non-combat troops, and checked out for exercises, qual and other unit training, but were assigned by ser.no to individuals. In combat zones, weapons of course, stayed with the individuals even in the air wing. It really ticked off the AirForce guys when we'd wander over to their side of DaNang with loaded M-14's, 45's or whatever else we had hanging on us, but they couldn't do squat about it. ![]() But to your point, I think it may be difficult to find records, but the only way to find out is to contact the Navy archives I posted above. Also, the lot of 100 may well be the only designated lot sent to the USS New York, but I'd bet dollars to donuts they had earlier general issue .45s and other arms on board the day the ship joined the fleet. It was a warship afterall, and that means a contingent of Marines on board, at the very least, for security, shore patrol when in port, etc. who would have to have been armed. Last edited by GunnyGene; 01-14-2013 at 08:26 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
(The next 100 in the serial range went to the sister ship USS Texas (BB35) laid down 4/17/11, launched 5/18/12 and completed 3/12/14.) So there may have been later issues, but unlikely there were any earlier... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moore, Idaho
contributor
Posts: 2,639
|
I'd certainly love to own one. I'm a Navy vet, However, I disagree that it would be worth up to 10k. Since the gun is not in perfect condition, but if you do have the provenence on paper as to where it was, who owned it when and in what wars, then it will definitely have collectors value. I think you could get probably 2-4 thousand dollars for it, but, with it's condition and rust possibly less - that will depend on the auction that you put it in and how good the auctioneer is. Keep in mind that you lose 10-25% of the sale price for the auction commission.
Rust on a piece is never good. Removing it means removing some original metal. There are innumerable scratches on the surface but the rust is the worst problem. I am a collector and rust can not be left on the metal - it just gets worse. Having to remove it to protect the metal changes the original metal parts and reduces value. After rust removal you have to protect the rest of the original metal. Your 1911 is a blued 1911. After the careful removing of the ALL of the original bluing the slide and the frame will need to be hot blued to bring it back to it's original glory. So, as a collector I would not pay more than about $300 for the pistol since after restoration it would not be worth much more than the investment - costs to restore it would be around $800 or more. Leaving the rust on it is not an option. The restoration alone reduces it's value. 'Possibly' ,with very loving restoration, the value after restoration with history paperwork would bring the value up to the 1-2k range, but never to the 10k area. To be in the 10k area the piece really does have to be in very good condition and work and fire well + have original documented providence. Every gun in my collection I do fire - even my 100 year old tiny .32 top break revolver. It is sad to see such a nice piece of history in such poor condition. I hate to break a bubble, but this 1911 is nowhere worth $10,000 - even with it's paperwork if you have it. Granted, there is a sucker born every day, but you will not find one at a gun auction. With no real paperwork, the pistol was the side arm of the 'petty officer of the watch' - possibly for many years. 10k is ridiculous. Tools stop working if they don't get occasional use and they definitely stop working without caring maintenance.
__________________
We are not sheeple, we will not fade quietly away. We will stand up for Freedom, for our rights, and, we will fight to protect the Constitution and our Freedom. We are the militia, we are the PEOPLE. Last edited by WHSmithIV; 01-15-2013 at 02:53 AM.. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|