|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vermont
Posts: 891
|
*********************************************************
That Pesky Merchant Seaman is Back! (Hamrick v. Pres. Bush) From: "Don Hamrick" <ki5ss@yahoo.com That Pesky Merchant Seaman is Back! (Hamrick v. Pres. Bush) I completed a voyage aboard a dredge from Jacksonville, Florida to Astoria, Oregon via the Panama Canal. I'm back in Norfolk, Virginia with a month wages. Paying the Supreme Court filing fee tomorrow. Buying a new laptop tomorrow. Preparing Supplemental Brief if all goes well. Were can I get of list of Second Amendment cases denied by the U.S. Supreme Court? Were can I get of list of Second Amendment cases denied by federal district courts and U.S. courts of appeals? Someone mentioned www.constitution.org but forgot the page URL. If I can show that the U.S. District Court/DC in denying my case with prejudice with all my motions, and the U.S. Court of Appeals/DC dismissing my case, affirming the lower court, and denying all my motions in the appeals court amounts to a denial of my First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of greivances and denying my right to due process (granting me only procedural process, deny me my right to substantial due process) I might have a better standing with my Supplemental Brief. If the U.S. Supreme Court denies my Petition for Writ of Certiorari then I will file a complaint with Justice Department for judicial bias and maybe corruption against the Second Amendment. I am going after the "Three Monkey Judicial System" if I can. I intend to do what the NRA refuses to do. I am not intimidated by the probability of losing my Second Amendment case for "National Open Carry Handgun." I will take my lose as Evidence in a new case challenging the fitness of the judges involved in my case. It will be my attempt to turn a defeat into a victory. "A Legal Offensive." The argument must be made that there is an existing judicial void where the judicial limit falls short of the constitutional limit - i.e., a judicial predilection to avoid Second Amendment issues (National Open Carry Handgun) where the federal judicial system has the sworn duty to take those case but refuse to do so and applies the "with prejudice" so that those cases do not reinter the system. I'm fighting mad! Why isn't the NRA on this matter?
-->
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|