|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Portland Oregon, USA
Posts: 787
|
I am getting a Ruger Scout rifle. I want a fairly decent scope for it. Im thinking about being able to reach out comfortably to around 500 yards.
My inclination is towards Leopold but thats because of my bias generated by the military. My m14EBR that I use in my squad has a Leupold Mk 4. Which obviously is amazing but it is so expensive! What is a civilian counterpart that is decent, affordable, and durable? Any thoughts?
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
Leupold has reintroduced the redfield line. I think a redfield revolution the same power as your Leupy on your service rifle with accu-range reticle will reach out and touch somebody at 500 easy enough. Heck with the accu-range reticl itll reach out to 300 without even touching the turret..
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Iowa
Contributor
Posts: 1,630
|
I agree with JLA, however, I shoot several BSA's and like them. I know some members don't care much for them but my experience and Zanes have been pretty good. Keeps your cost down to $150-$200 for a variable. I'm 3/4 blind and poor so I usually purchase 6X-24X 40mm and so far so good. If I could afford them I would purchase Zeiss or Leupold VXIII.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Iowa
Contributor
Posts: 1,747
|
CDNN has some good buys also they are BEC and some others but worth a look.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Harriman, Tn
Contributor
Posts: 2,565
|
I'm a Nikon Monarch kinda guy. They have clear optics, transfer light well, stay dialed in and don't have the price tag of the Leupold. JMO.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pensacola
Contributor
Posts: 1,256
|
Mueller has a decent scope (8-32x44 Target Dot) for around $250. I recently put one on a CZ 452, and am well pleased with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW Louisiana
Posts: 813
|
Look at the Millett line of scopes...Im impressed with the two that I own and the price was about half that of a MkIV..
__________________
Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc'-ra-cy) - a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Portland Oregon, USA
Posts: 787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,309
|
I've been looking at scopes for the last month (replacing my Redfield Revolution 4-12x on my .223). I've been looking at the Sightron siii 6-24 and the Vortex PST 6-24. Both are beautiful scopes with great optics and very nice reticles. They both go for around $750 and both worth taking a look at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Western new york
Posts: 17
|
+1 for the Redfield
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Portland Oregon, USA
Posts: 787
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,309
|
In that price range, I don't feel you could do better than the Vortex PST or Sightron siii. I am very close to pulling the trigger on one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
Quote:
My Nikon has twice as clear optics and a better reticle, the side focus is graduated in yardage hashes instead of un-labeled lines like the ziess, and the Nikon has about 1.5 inches more tube to play with for mounting. His Zeiss cost him just shy of a grand at cabelas, My nikon cost me 309 bucks at academy. Now if i were gonna spend big money on a scope (like 1500+) I still wouldnt go with a Ziess. once you get up into that kinda range in price they are competing with nightforce and countersniper and other purpose built optics.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
The Millett TRS-1 and 2 are excellent tactical scopes. My favorite millett is the Buck Gold fine hair 30mm tube. Excellent target scope for the modest 350 bucks.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 262
|
I just absolutely love the Bushnell DOA scopes. The aiming points are really helpful when hunting. I would take a look at them if you are going to be hunting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pa/Maine
Posts: 44
|
I have owned Leupold and Nikons for years ,but I bought my first Burris a few months back.I held several types of scopes up and the Burris had the best optics of the bunch.So far it has held up to a couple of hunts I went on.The price was not bad either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SW Fort Worth
Contributor
Posts: 4,881
|
We've got a great resource in Doug here on the forum also.
http://www.thefirearmsforum.com/show...446#post805446 http://www.thefirearmsforum.com/showthread.php?t=95040 Some of the best prices I've seen online and he took really great care of a friends scope needs.
__________________
. What are you gonna do, talk the alien to death? -- (on Sigourney Weaver's worry about Guns in Aliens) "Safety is something that happens between your ears, not something you hold in your hands." "I carry a small gun to compensate for my huge Blue press." ![]() . |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
Burris is another good one. I like the fullfield2 series. and the Ballistic-plex reticle is great for hitting your mark out to 500 yds without having to adjust the turrets.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,309
|
I went out and bought the Sightron Sii Big Sky 6-24x 42mm and installed it on my .223. Then took the Redfield Revolution 4-12 and installed it on my 10/22.
The optics in the Sightron puts the optics in the Redfield to shame. Seems like it is going to be a very good scope. The Sightron has the Dot reticle, should work excellent for target practice and varmints. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
I like that fine reticle.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Iowa
Contributor
Posts: 1,630
|
Thanks for the input JLA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
yessuh. In my line of tinkerin I have had the chance to work with most of the proclaimed 'best' optics. I dont mind voicing my honest opinion.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,305
|
And its not that the Zeiss os a bad scope. Heck I can shoot the same .5 MOA groups with it. The problem is this.. If youre a big time scope mfgr and you offer a thousand dollar piece of glass for rifle shooters, better make damn sure another reputable scope mfgr doesnt have a superior unit for 1/3 the price.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|