|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
|
I want one really bad, however it costs almost as much as the gun.
I just dont think I can justify the upgrade. Plus I like my Bushnell that I currently have.
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,334
|
I love the leupold scopes they are awesome! but I havnt been able to afford one so my main huntin' rifle has a Nikon on it I love it too!
__________________
And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. Revelation 19:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 66
|
If you can try to find an old one, even if its damamged you can send it in and it will be rapaired at the factory or replaced for shipping cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Contributor
Posts: 17,622
|
Nieman5
it depends a lot on what your doing and what rifle and round your using i have Leo's , but i save em for where the difference will count my .223 deer rifle i use a bushnell as its a 300-400 meter rifle and the bushy is fine for that my .300 win mag i use the leo on , 1 recoil the Leo will take it all day 2 the range , the .300 is a 800 yard rifle and at that range the difference between the bushy mid range and the leo really shows up , the high end bushy's are not quite ( but not that far off) the leo so the leo gives me a tad more range and reliability i see folks with leo's on .22 hunters and its a waste , a tasco will do the job nicely a saying here , horses for courses meaning for a nag job use a rough nag , for a elite and long distance , get your champion thoughbred out .. good luck |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 707
|
Throwing the names around without the models is almost pointless. I have a couple of Bushnells that are much better than a couple of my Leupolds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Contributor
Posts: 17,622
|
Quote:
the mid range bushy's are as good or BETTER than the budget leo's now counter sniper too , in fact the low end leo's are not worth buying in my thoughts , too many outfits have picked up their game the last few years but the top end leo's are still hard to beat but the $$$$ ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Low end Leos? is this the VX1 Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,715
|
I have many different brand scopes including Leopolds and Burris's. But lately the only scopes I buy are the Bushnell Trophy's. Frankly, I can not see any difference in their mages between those of either the Leopolds or the Burris and the Trophy's. There may be a difference but my eyes can not see it! Most scopes today (except for some of the scopes under $100) have adjustments that hold and repeat. Most all scopes are sealed and filled with nitrogen. Most scopes are pretty well finished and made. Some of the lesser scopes are even multi-coated. So why pay for the name? But pay too little and you may be disappointed.
The only scopes I have ever had come apart were some old cheapy Tasco's I bought when I first started shooting and price was important. Today I can afford any scope I want and I regularly choose the Bushnell Trophy's. I did ruin one scope (knocked the reticule loose). It was mounted on a bolt action 50BMG conversion unit on an AR and it had slipped to where the bell was hitting the mount. It was a 50BMG specific scope and Millet replaced it free. I secured it this time with four rings (honed to perfect roundness with a tool I made and grinding compound), and glued the scope tube to the mounts. Slipping stopped. I will add that the repair station for Millet was Bushnell (does Bushnell now own Millet???). LDBennett |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 707
|
VXI, II, Rifleman are all pretty low end in my opinion. I have a vxiii that is pretty low end for what it cost. I think for that amount of money, I should have gotten better glass.
I love my Leupold bench rest scopes, other than them, I am no real fan of the gold ring. As far as their flagships go, Leupold can hang with anyone. Their low and mid stuff is, in my opinion, a poor value. Last edited by reynolds357; 12-07-2011 at 06:54 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA State
Posts: 66
|
How do you figure a leupold is low end ??
__________________
![]() U.S. Army Retired ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Contributor
Posts: 17,622
|
that series aint what the average leo's are
i've a few friends who say recoil kills em , i've not got one myself , i actually buy leo's second hand now get a top line 5 year old one 1/2 the price of the new ones and better quality sad what brands do eh .. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 707
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|