|
![]() |
|
|
TheFirearmsForum.com
FOUNDED: February 9, 2001 |
If you prefer to make a donation by check,
send an email to Support for the mailing address. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Texas
Contributor
Posts: 1,871
|
The Nightforce 12-42x56 NXS Long Distance scope is what I was looking at. Its pretty expensive but instead I will settle with a cheaper scope possibly with the same magnification if one is available. Is it possible to view a 3 inch target at about 300 yards or to make this a simple question how far can this scope help you see right up to your bullet holes on paper. I been trying to find one for atleast a True football field lenght(100 yards) so I can see where the holes on paper can be viewable at this distance and I cant find an answer. Thanks for any help
-->
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pensacola
Contributor
Posts: 1,255
|
I don't know if it helps, but I have an 8-32 that I can read the date on my watch at 50 yds. Surely you could see bullet holes at 100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 7,397
|
I have an elite 4200 bushnell 6x24x i dont recall the objective but i can see my bullet holes at 100 yrds clear as day.
__________________
![]() Who are you going to serve today? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,309
|
My 6-24 Sightron has no trouble seeing .223 bullet holes at 100 yards set to x18 power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 707
|
Quote:
If you want Night Force quality, you are not going to get it any cheaper than Night Force. There are scopes just as good and some better, but they definitely aint cheaper than NightForce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Near a brook & pond in Ma
Posts: 733
|
I agree with reynolds 357
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 646
|
I've heard good things about the millet lrs 1 6.5-25x56. for the price it might be worth a try before getting the night force.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,280
|
Night Force optics are for serious shooters. If you are going to shoot 1000 yds regularly then by all means grab one, the couple Gs youll drop on it will be worth it, but if you never really venture out past 200 yds and maybe a couple times a year shoot at 300 or 400 youd be much better served by a 300 dollar Nikon.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 646
|
I was hoping to do 1 mile shots with the millet with its 100 MOA adjustment, I've heard good things from other long distance shooters about this scope. I'd only be using it till i could actually afford a night force.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 707
|
You are still going to need a lot of cant in your base and probably some more in your rings. I try not to use more than 50% of the available adjustment in my scopes.
Last edited by reynolds357; 12-19-2011 at 09:46 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Stafford, VA
Contributor
Posts: 3,071
|
25MOA bases with the millet will get you to 1 mile if you have the right cartridge and load.
I know a guy taking P dogs at 1200 y with a 20br custom shop savage 12 benchrest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Advanced Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hesperia, CA
Posts: 5,710
|
We have the Millett 6-25x56 on a 50BMG bolt gun. It survives the recoil fine once we got the scope to stay put from recoil. It took four rings, grinding the rings to be concentric and gluing the scope to the rings. Before we got the scope stabilized on the gun, the scope moved its turret against a scope mount and broke the reticule inside the scope loose (OUR FAULT!). Millet replaced the scope no questions asked.
But be aware that only rings available for it are the ones Millett provides with the scope as they are 35mm I believe (not the same as the huge Leopold rings, either). When the scope was returned by us for repair, it was handled by the Bushnell Service Center(?). Maybe Bushnell owns Millett (??). Anyway, the scope is excellent and has a clear sharp image even at ranges in excess of 1000 yds. It is priced in the $400 price range. We recommend it. LDBennett |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,280
|
Yep. 25MOA cant will do it for just about any rig thats actually capable of shooting a mile with precision. Itll put your 200 yd zero at the bottom of the elevation adjustment and give you all the zero for cranking up the elevation to dope long ranges. Dont sweat using all the adjustment in your scope, thats what its there for. Just make sure if those knobs start getting tight not to force them. If they begin to tighten up they have run out of adjustment and you will actually be crushing the springs in your scope if you over tighten the knobs. and that WILL mess thing up when you return to zero. I do tend to stay a half rev off max adjustment just to prevent this from happening. Which brings me to another personal preference id like to point out. I favor BDC reticles. If you have a scope with BDC reticle built in then you can zero your scope at 500 yds with its aiming point in the reticle and not only will it be accurate at all the other aiming points for the closer distances, but when coupled with the 20 or 25 MOA canted base you wont need but maybe half the scopes adjustment to dope a mile if you use the 500 yd aim point on the reticle and adjust from there. I like to think of it as combining precision kentucky windage with more precise scope usage to get the utmost from your shooting system.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 646
|
Thanks for the input, I'm going to get the savage 110 ba .338 lapua in the spring. I think they already come with a 20 MOA base. Looks like the Millet should handle fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
*TFF Moderator/Host*
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Heart Of Texas
Contributor
Posts: 17,280
|
Id think so. Millett makes good optics. I like the Buck gold fine hair reticle for target work, but its a mosnter scope. nearly a foot and a half long and 30mm tube.
__________________
It takes 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 3 for proper trigger squeeze. The latest caliber or gear is no substitute for experience and skill. Rifles and cartridges don't make hits -- shooters do. Fact of life: After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Stafford, VA
Contributor
Posts: 3,071
|
I have heard from a few police sniper course instructors that the millet offerings are tracking just as good as nightforce and Leopoldo mk 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Acworth, Georgia Northwest of Atlanta in the edge of the mountains.
Posts: 19
|
I am sure there are plenty of good and or serviceable scopes available. However, I have become addicted to Nightforce and have just ordered my fourth one.
I have other scopes Burris and Leupold, but none of them, absolutely none compare to the optic quality and positive tracking of the Nightforce. Probably in my 67 years I have finally learned that when it comes to optics you get exactly what you pay for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 109
|
To add to LDBennett's comment...
The reason the scope was returned with Bushnell packaging is because Bushnell owns several other sporting optic/equipment brands.... 1) Simmons 2) Millett 3) Blackwater Gear 4) Bolle' (sports eyewear) 5) Browning Optics 6) Butler Creek 7) Hoppe's (solvents by the way are made by Tri-Pac, Inc and sold through Bushnell) 8) Serengeti (sports eyewear) 9) Stoney Point (shooting monopods and sticks) 10) Tasco 11) Uncle Mike's 12) Licensing agreement with Bausch & Lomb Bushnell itself is owned by a private equity firm called MidOcean Partners. NO ONE is who they say they are. It bothers me to a certain point. As a consumer I want to know WHO I am buying from. In a day of global economies, equity firms, recapitalization, and restructuring it's hard to know for sure who you're actually sending your hard earned money to.
__________________
Jeff Gun List: Beretta A300 12ga., Lee-Enfield No.4 Mk1, Savage 10FP heavy barrel .308 w/ 4-12x 50mm Ballistic range finding scope and Harris bipod, Bushmaster AR-15 M4-A2, Springfield Armory XD Tactical 9mm, Marlin Model 60 .22, Browning Buck Mark .22, and Springfield Armory 1911-A1 Stainless Steel "Loaded," Browning BL-22. I also "shoot" with Canon cameras. Does that count? Wish list: H&K USP, Beretta 92-FS, CZ-75B, Anschutz 64MPR, FN-FAL,& an M-1 Garand |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6
|
i have one of these on a AICS AW .308. ive had nightforce too and this one is just as good and not as $$$
http://www.valdada.com/scopes/tactic...-illum-reticle |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Former Guest
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Stafford, VA
Contributor
Posts: 3,071
|
I have know a few that got one of them valdada scopes and they just love them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
V.I.P. Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Western New York
Posts: 186
|
I have a Nightforce NXS 12-42x56 mounted on my .50BMG. I couldn't be happier with it. As for finding a scope to see bullet holes with, might I suggest that you get a good spotting scope and tripod. Borrow one, maybe and use it for a while. Then, you'll get an idea of how much magnification you're looking for.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|