1986 automatic weapons ban unconstitutional?

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by Hans Rudolph, May 8, 2012.

  1. Hans Rudolph

    Hans Rudolph New Member

    May 8, 2012
    It seems to me the 1986 automatic weapons ban infringes on 2nd Amendment rights. Is there a movement to have this ban declared unconstitutional?
  2. yellerdawg

    yellerdawg Former Guest

    Apr 5, 2009
    I dont "know" of any such attempt, however, there are those who never
    tire in efforts to add to the law and regulations...it would be nice I suppose
    to have some weed eating as to this and related areas...but I expect such will
    not happen until something more simple is done..say...repeal of the Income
    Tax laws....for which many have tried for much longer and with much more
    legal prudence and grounds to do so...


  3. muddober

    muddober Active Member

    Sep 19, 2008
    Carson City Nevada
    Without question the 1986 automatic weapons ban is unconstitutional as is the 1934 National Firearms Act when it made it illegal for any person to posses a machine gun without registering it with ATF. There have been too many constitutional violations made against us by our government to mention.

    That being said I will mention one to illustrate how it works. The government puts a law into motion like the birth of the IRS in 1913 through amending the constitution with the 16 amendment. Then by regulation through the power entrusted with these agencies they trample the constitution. For years title 26 section 7203 of the IRS made it a misdemeanor for anyone not to file a tax return. Then in about 1989 part B was added (60501) making it a felony for anyone involved in trade or business who receives over $10,000.00 in cash who does not report the cash giver to the IRS. So now any attorney who receives over 10K in cash from a client has to reveal that client to the IRS, blowing out the window any attorney client rule of privilege. Same thing with car dealer who receives over 10K and does not identify and report the cash giver to the IRS can find himself subject to 5 years in the joint and 250K in fines.

    One would think that when that rule was enacted it would have made national news so no one would run afoul of the law, but they didn't. Instead they targeted a couple of high end car dealers that through their tax returns had reported the cash as income on their books, but had failed (not knowing of the new law)to report the cash giver's name and ID, all done to make an example of these dealers to others. The government would like us all to believe they are there "To Protect and Serve" us. I see it as "To Intimidate and Instill Fear" in us or "Tax and Hinder" us. If you think thats bad just what for Obozo Care.

    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  4. Guts3d

    Guts3d Well-Known Member

    Mar 19, 2012
    Pittsburgh, Pa
    Interesting. Is taxation of a citizen's land also unconstitutional? I remember a few friends had this argument a long time ago and I had no idea who would know.
  5. yellerdawg

    yellerdawg Former Guest

    Apr 5, 2009

    Agreed. I only brought up the tax ordeal to infer the ordeal of expecting
    any firearm law appeal etc...

    Also, while they did/do inject the practice stopping drug money laundrying
    with such a law/codes...all know that even though you can get to a point
    as drug dealers do that you simply have too much money to handle..there
    always has and will be ways for crooks to so do...

    And only our government civil service folks could hatch and plan a joint
    task force with a known schedule of start and end, spend millions
    collecting evidence, inject informants to observe and even assist in
    deals and murders and jobs and acts, and end such efforts with a
    planned trap of proving the "worst" crime you can commit to them..ie:
    Lying to the Grand Jury or Court ..or unexplained revenue...and all else
    crimes involved plea bargained away per planned course...

    Same garbage as when we here in Texas had the old "Blue Laws" per
    religious strong arm...and even my late Father, a prominent minister,
    never understood them, short of stuff like bars closed till after church...etc..

    I mean...for years it was stuff like..on Sunday...you could buy the
    hammer, but not the nails...etc...

    Tell me I am off base...

    yellerdawg :D
  6. cutter

    cutter New Member

    Aug 3, 2008
    It seems that the whole 20th Century was against the Consittution if you really think about it. Early in that time peroid the Progressive people thought that they should interfere in everone's life to help them become more civilized. Now look where that has gotten us, we are more violent and smothered with laws telling us what and where with EVERYTHING we do or say! Anyone else as fed up with this as I am??? Back to Guns, if I am a decent person why should I have to subject myself to the Sh&t that the fed says I have to and pay the skyhigh price of such? I am now afraid to say what I really want to due to the repurctions by the same Fed! Go figure!!! What are our Founding Fathers saying upstairs??
    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  7. Dan01

    Dan01 Former Guest

    Apr 20, 2012
    Goose Creek SC
    The original post was removed...................I am not permitted to have an opinion on certain subjects without being castigated!!

    If you don't like my posts, please put me on your "ignore list"

    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  8. Alpo

    Alpo Well-Known Member

    Feb 3, 2007
    NW Florida
    Well, I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion.
  9. bobski

    bobski Former Guest

    Jan 16, 2005
    va., conn., & mo.
    im with dan01.

    whats next?

    tanks parked in everyones driveway? because im an american?

    if you want it bad enough, pay for it and register it. oh wait a minute. thats what class3 do already. looks like rights arent being infringed on to me.

    but being denied a permit, is another story.
    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  10. pickenup

    pickenup Active Member

    Some people actually believe in the documents this country was founded on, some don't.
  11. hogger129

    hogger129 Well-Known Member

    Nov 29, 2009
    I don't want or need a machine gun. If someone else wants one, that's their decision, not mine. I think if they can pass a background check, let em have em. The same should go for handguns. This "waiting period" nonsense just doesn't really make sense to me. I highly doubt someone is going to get mad and go buy a handgun to go harm someone, in which case they need a 'cool off' period. More Brady Law nonsense. And I look at it as a kind of discrimination.

    I don't think any reasonable person really wants a tank, rocket launcher or explosivs, therefore that's a moot point.
    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  12. Alpo

    Alpo Well-Known Member

    Feb 3, 2007
    NW Florida
    If you sell your car to a felon, who then uses it as a getaway car in a bank robbery, couldn't you, the seller, be the target of a lawsuit?

    How about if you sell a gun to a non-felon, who uses it in his first ever felony? Couldn't you, the seller, be the target of a lawsuit?

    You might be quite okay with it, but I am offended - no, that's not harsh enough - I'm pissed at the government, every time I have to PROVE that I am NOT a criminal, in order to buy a gun.
  13. hogger129

    hogger129 Well-Known Member

    Nov 29, 2009
    Yes I guess I see your point.

    It also gets quite annoying especially if you live in a state that has a long waiting period. Here in Wisconsin is two days - which I think is simply annoying and unnecessary. I heard some states have two week waiting periods.
    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  14. muddober

    muddober Active Member

    Sep 19, 2008
    Carson City Nevada
    I must had to your comment Alpo that I also hate to prove I don't speak Spanish by having to press 1. I have a friend who left a message on his recorder that said "if you don't speak Spanish please press unno"

    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  15. muddober

    muddober Active Member

    Sep 19, 2008
    Carson City Nevada
    hogger your comments has garnered a response out of that may not be very popular here. While I am a staunch supporter of the constitution including the second amendment, I do not agree just because one walks upright and has an opposing thumb should be able to walk into a gun shop and buy a gun. I don't agree with your thought that people get pissed and then go buy a gun because they do. Remember Sirhan Sirhan? Also I don't trust the government to make that call except only the government has the resources to have the data base to do back ground checks. Perhaps some organization like the NRA or a newly created one could exist being funded by a tax or fee of each gun purchase and that organization for limited purpose would have access to a national data base on persons. Additionally far too many of us take our guns to gun shows and off them to those who's only perquisite is they have the money to pay for it. Not good.

    I am one of those unreasonable people you write of who would love to have an F15 with all of it guns and rockets, just thinking of all the giant rocks I could kill with it makes me grin, that is if I didn't kill myself first trying to fly it.

Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum All semi-automatic pistols sold in Ca. To require micro stamp. May 20, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Barry O'Drama May Skirt Congress to Ban Semiautomatics Nov 21, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum 2nd Amendment "No Obstacle" to Banning Automatic Weapons Oct 16, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Heads Up Nevada: Semi-Automatic Rifle Classification: 8/28 Aug 27, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Semi-Automatic Firearms Mar 11, 2008