2nd ammedment paper i have to write

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by zkovach, Oct 21, 2010.

  1. zkovach

    zkovach Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,008
    Location:
    Michigan
    I have to write a position paper on the second ammendment. My take is that anti gun laws raise crime rates and cause more problems. Where can i find statistics, info, and aftermath of anti gun laws. anyone have any good websites?

    Thanks,
    Z
  2. todd51

    todd51 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    3,227
    Location:
    Central, Ohio
  3. ofitg

    ofitg Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,446
  4. Marlin T

    Marlin T Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,906
    Location:
    New Mexico
  5. Millwright

    Millwright Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,973
    Don't forget to check John Lott's site, too !
    There's also the SAF. >MW
  6. hogger129

    hogger129 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    4,154
    I've read through these sites Marlin posted, and I have to say there is a bottomless pit of information within them.

    If I were writing a paper on the 2A... I would include why the Second Amendment is so important, even today. Especially with respect to the illegal immigrant/drug cartel battle going on down on the US-Mexico border.

    For me, these are the reasons we have militias. When the Federal government can't protect us, the militia is supposed to defend the security of a free state.

    As far as the Second Amendment... The keeping and bearing of Arms was intended to protect against a totalitarian takeover by one's own government. Something the Founders had just fought an entire war with England over. As far as defending from criminals... I think that's a reason why they put the comma between the militia clause and the rest of the Amendment. They obviously knew that the militia weren't only ones who should have Arms. The People - law-abiding, good people like you or me or anybody on this board - should retain the right to keep and bear Arms. I think they felt that self-defense was a given. But in my opinion, the right to keep and bear arms was a right not only reserved for the 'well-regulated militia,' but a right retained by the people as well. The 'people' has never meant a militia. It means citizens.

    I don't think there is one, particular Amendment in the Bill of Rights that is THE most important. To me, they are all equally important. If one is taken away, they all fall like dominoes. However, the Second Amendment is what really keeps the status quo between totalitarianism and government of the people, for the people and by the people instituted for the sake of securing the rights of free men.

    Let us know if you need any help. I'm sure anybody here can provide a great point on just about anything 2A related.

    Good luck on your paper.
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2010
  7. armedandsafe

    armedandsafe Guest

  8. Jim K

    Jim K New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,397
    IMHO, it is better to avoid the statistics and use the antis' emotional tactics against them. Talk about the poor man in Washington, DC, who tried to oppose the neighborhood drug gang. When he was interviewed by a reporter for the local left-wing paper, he showed the reporter his old shotgun. The reporter, who was working for the drug dealers, called the police, who confiscated the gun. The next night the old man was killed, beaten to death by home intruders. Gun control had triumphed again!

    Talk about a single mother, terrified each night as armed gangs roam the neighborhood. She can't arm herself because her city has decided that people who live in public housing are criminals and can't be allowed to have a weapon of any kind. The criminals pay no attention to the law and the politicians take a cut of the proceeds.

    Talk about the lies told by the gun control advocates. When the now-overturned DC law was proposed in 1976, the local newspaper, a fanatic advocate of gun bans, told the people that the law would reduce crime by 90%; in two years, crime had increased 300%. Needless to say, the paper demanded even stricter gun control laws, and insisted that the rest of the country should follow its lead.

    Talk about the racism behind gun control. Talk about a lily-white Congress passing a law to require gun transfers "face to face." Talk about a California law requiring ammunition to be sold "face to face". No dealer can tell if someone is a criminal by looking at his or her face; the only purpose of such laws is to keep people of the "wrong" race disarmed.

    Talk about the hypocrisy of gun control proponents who say no one needs protection, yet who hire armed guards to protect them. (The late Senator Edward M. Kennedy said no one needed a gun; he didn't - he had thirty armed guards on his payroll.)

    Jim
  9. Gun Geezer

    Gun Geezer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,376
    Location:
    Central Florida
    All good stuff, but I would still include some statistics. Facts can play to emotion in a positive way.
  10. Marlin T

    Marlin T Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,906
    Location:
    New Mexico

    Here is another place that is PACKED with historical documents, Federalist Papers too. ;)
    http://gunshowonthenet.com/

    EDIT:

    You might want to include this case.

    "There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state (or Federal) against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but it does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state (gov't) to let people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order" (Bowers v. DeVito, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 686F.2d 616 [1982]). [http://www.jpfo.org/GCA_68.htm]
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2010
  11. Teejay9

    Teejay9 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,257
    Location:
    Southwest Corner of the US, "Where no stinking fen
    If guns go away, all the evil in the world would stop. They would have no means to commit crimes. It would be a pacifist paradise. (The sarcasm button is ON) TJ
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2010
  12. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,575
    Location:
    Australia
    show them the Australian experience of gun control , within 2 years crime up 300% new crimes called home invasion now daily events , only criminals have decent weapons but if theres a altercation between a criminal and a armed civilian then the civilian gets in strife and the crime has no licence to lose or money to be fined and gets let go as a poor victim of society to reoffend often within the same day

    while the legal citizen is waiting for bail , for a lawyer , for justice that wont come

    state how the best way to fix this is to neuter all anti gun people as a minimum , extermination would be better
  13. hogger129

    hogger129 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    4,154
    Sounds like Australia needs a real-life Batman. Like a vigilante to fight the criminals if the people in power will not.

    I would never advocate exterminating them. I'd rather show everybody the errors of the anti-gun people, so that more people rally to our cause and support the natural right of self defense with a deadly weapon.
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2010
  14. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,575
    Location:
    Australia
    maybe if they start making arguments that you have no right to self defence that a woman being raped is a lesser crime than defending the same lady with a gun

    maybe then you'll change your mind , but i guess you'll see that yourselves soon enough ... make up your mind then eh .. when you are told because you have a gun your a criminal , but told also that criminals have guns to survive so they are ok ... hahahaha lots to learn ..

    welcome to gun control
  15. tyc

    tyc New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    129
    For what it's worth, you shouldn't "have to ..." write such a paper, if anything, look forward to it.

    Recent Supreme Court decisions and resultant actions on the part of the anti-gun elements in (of all places) Washington DC, let alone Chicago and the like should provide an abundance of good "raw meat" for such a position paper.

    If I may suggest, when you've finished it, send a copy to this forum so we can all see what you've come up with.

    tyc
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Article in UT Austin paper about gun free zones and CHL holders Jun 14, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Newspaper Plans to Compile State-by-State List of CCW Permit Holders Jan 31, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Paper work May 27, 2011
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum 2nd amendment paper is finished Nov 11, 2010
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Doonsbury tripe in the paper today!!!!!!! May 2, 2010

Share This Page