308 vs 7.62 Nato

Discussion in 'The Ammo & Reloading Forum' started by WILD CAT, Jul 29, 2009.

  1. gdmoody

    gdmoody Moderator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    8,910
    Location:
    Northeast Georgia
    It does not touch the extractor, but reading the other thread I mentioned, I can see that the gunk sticks the case in the chamber and makes it very difficult to extract the case which is "cemented" to the chamber. This, as I see it, could either pull the head off the case or jerk the extractor out of the bolt, which is what I think was happening.
  2. WILD CAT

    WILD CAT New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    110
    Location:
    Caracas, Venezuela
    From the comprehensive posts on this thread I find difficult to choose an answer. I think it would be an expensive error to unwillingly shooting anything but factory rounds and turn out shooting a clone destroying the gun. Any way thank You all.
  3. GMFWoodchuck

    GMFWoodchuck New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,369
    Location:
    Binghamton, NY
    In a modern .308 rifle it will be safe to shoot all 308 and 7.62 ammo of reputable manufacture. Meaning if it has a federal, winchester, or some other company that you know to be a good company the ammo will be safe. If the ammo is being sold by bass pro shops, midway, or some other company it will also likely be safe. If you go to a random gun show and see a table that has 7.62 ammo from a company that you have never heard of walk away. Besides any new rifle sold in this country with the 308/7.62X51 dimensions will likely be marked 308 anyway. If you chose to buy an older military rifle marked with the 7.62 destination use the NATO marked 7.62 ammo. However, if you come across a used bolt action sniper rifle that's branded 7.62 you should also be safe being that any you would come across are going to be the exact same gun (Rem 700, savage 110, Win 70, and etc) as the cilivian version mechanically speaking. The only practical difference will be in how they look.

    In short, if you're going new, you almost do not have much choice but to buy a 308 rifle. If you're going used, the only 7.62 branded guns will be of military type and you should be using NATO marked ammo for all the reasons the others have already said. Older civilian guns will likely be 308.

    In either case with 7.62 ammo or any ammo for any gun, if you're not sure if it's any good. Do not buy it.

    Do not worry. Which ever destination you chose there is plenty of safe ammo of reputable manufacture. If you want to hunt you might be a bit better off with a 308 being that there is way...way more hunting ammo with the 308 destination versus the 7.62. Most 7.62 ammo, from I see, is typical target type.
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2009
  4. Hammerslagger

    Hammerslagger New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,097
    I was reading this thread and "scratching my head" in disbelief relative to 308 Win. pressures increasing from 52K to 62K range in recent years under SAAMI guidelines. Especially, since SAAMI seems to have reduced pressures (and thus performance) for almost everything over the last 50 years.

    It has long been known that PSI values obtained by Piezo Transducers are not exactly the same pressure values obtained using the older copper or lead crusher cylinder method. However, few (including myself) realize that these values can vary from 52K to 62K depending only on the measuring method used.

    For those with serious academic interest, go to: http://kwk.us/pressures.html
  5. 29yrhkr

    29yrhkr New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2
    A NOTE : I HAVE SOME 7.62 NATO ERA 1960 GERMAN, IT HAS BERDEAN PRIMING
  6. LDBennett

    LDBennett Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,296
    Location:
    Hesperia, CA
    The reference to my PTR-91 problem:

    According PTR INC. (PTR-91 manufacuturer):

    TAR LIKE SEALANT used in:
    South African
    Winchester white boxes marked 7.62
    Venezuela Cavim
    Austrian Hirtenberger
    Some lots of German

    In the PTR and H&K 91 variants the chamber is fluted to allow easy extraction of the cases against the roller lock action of these guns. In WWII and after, when the guns were developed originally, this fluting solved the hard extraction problem. The idea was that some of the gas pressure in the flutes of the chamber works against that in the case to minimize the hold the chamber has on the brass case. It normally works fine but the tar sealant goes into the flutes and coats the chamber wall making the chamber eventually stick to the cases, locking up the gun.

    Would this happen in a bolt gun? I am not sure but it seems to me the pressure would expand the cases tightly against the chamber wall, locking out all the gasses from getting to the chamber wall at least initially. If the gun shows excessive blowback of the gases on the body of the outside of the case then the cases MAY get stuck to the chamber wall. But I don't think that would happen normally. It is my opinion that the tar sealnt would not effect the extraction of the cases from a bolt gun but indeed causes problem with extraction from the H&K 91 and its clones. We proved it through the use of South African ammo in a brand new PTR-91. Cleaning the chamber and changing to reloads eliminated the problem completely.

    Broken extractors are usually associated with hard extraction often caused by excessive headspace (it says here ???). Or can be caused by rough chamber walls from corrosion from corrosively primed ammo usage in the life cycle of the gun. Smoothing the chamber with a drill motor and a stick wrapped in very fine sand paper, like 600 grit, often solves the problem IF you don't remove too much metal from the chamber walls to get the rust out. A smooth chamber aids extraction. Oiling the ammo cases can too but that makes the bolt work harder as the case friction is lost and the bolt has to take the full brunt of the pressure.

    Finding the cause of extractor breakage is a process of eliminating the things correct with the gun only to end up with only the problem left.

    LDBennett
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2009
  7. Joker18

    Joker18 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4
    Location:
    Southeastern US
    The big and major difference between 7.62X51mm NATO ammo and the .308 Win is the throat dimensions of the NATO 7.62 X 51 chambers are different and if my old memory serves me well the NATO chamber throats are deeper. Most current Milsurp ammo in 7.62X51 is loaded for military gas operated rifles and should be fine with any commercial bolt rifle chambered for .308 Win. The only exception is some of the 7.62 Indian surplus produced for belt fed machine guns that has been de-linked and sold as loose ammo. Some lots of that ammo was quite hot and are not recommended for M1A's and other gas operated military rifles.
  8. Vael

    Vael New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3
    Wrong.

    308 Max Pressure - 62k PSI
    7.62 NATO Max Pressure - 50k CUP ... or 60-61k PSI.


    Wrong.

    7.62 NATO brass is THICKER than 308 brass. Since they have nearly the same exterior dimensions and 7.62 brass is thicker, the levels are reduced by about 2 grains.



    If you really want to know the difference between 7.62 NATO and 308, I would suggest reading this:
    http://home.comcast.net/~ehorton/The Truth About 308 Win and 762 NATO.pdf

    Edit: For a short answer to if you can use 308 or 7.62nato in a rifle. I would say if you have a good quality rifle and good quality ammo, either should work fine. The main problems come mainly from severe out of spec exterior dimensions, not pressure. So if you have a tight tolerance, precise 308 rifle and you try to use some crap 7.62 from a 3rd world country, it might not work so well.
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2010
  9. Vael

    Vael New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3

    Ok, from my limited experience, I've noticed that most 308 companies download further away from their max compared to the military. For example, the 308 round at 62k psi max usually only gets loaded at 55k psi. The 7.62x51 nato round with a 60+k psi max will often get loaded to 58-60k psi. I think this is mainly to do with the 7.62 using thicker brass and being able to handle its max psi much better. So really, if you have a weak extractor and are running military 7.62, it might be too hot for your gun.


    See above post for more information.
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2010
  10. Popgunner

    Popgunner New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,764
    This is the link I posted here on TFF on loading blank cartridges where the guy stated 7.62 NATO cases are thinner than commercial cases. This may or may not be true in some types of NATO cases.
    http://hubpages.com/hub/Making-Blanks-Part-2

    This article has been done away with for unknown reasons.


    vael: you seem to be setting yourself up as an expert in this area. Making statements such as:

    "Ok, from my limited experience, I've noticed that most 308 companies download further away from their max compared to the military. For example, the 308 round at 62k psi max usually only gets loaded at 55k psi. The 7.62x51 nato round with a 60+k psi max will often get loaded to 58-60k psi. "

    Was this limited experience you had that caused you to notice this phenomenon with any type of testing equipment? Maybe you just surfed the net & took as gospel what you saw written?

    You & FAL Phill that wrote your article seem to think exactly the same. Are you two one in the same? FAL Phill seems to be arguing these points with many knowlegable folks on several gun forums.

    The M-118 match load you use to say NATO ammo is in the 61k psi range is not regular 7.62 NATO ammo.

    I'm just sayin':)
  11. Vael

    Vael New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3
    I am not FAL Phill, I copied the link to his article from another forum discussing this same topic, and though it would be helpful to this discussionl. I think its strange that many forums that are stuck on the 7.62=50kpsi, mostly the ones with people that have less experience with firearms.



    I never said anything about what ammo I use.


    Honestly dude, if you want to know the answer, stop searching the forums and get some real data.
  12. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,607
    Location:
    Australia
    Hold on,

    Australia makes 7.62 NATO but we make thin wall which is appoved

    we are a net importer of 5.56 NATO and buy from the US NZ and i think Canada

    and all are different slightly and i resize these before using them for reloads on my civilian same caliber rifles, i've based my civilian ones off available military stuff

    but each nation is a tad different each factory even..

    rule of thumb goes

    for 7.62 civilian is hot stuff

    for 5.56 Military is hot stuff

    check all NON NATO compliant ammo for chamber pressures

    ( some south american stuff will knock your socks off)

    even better, reload yourself , then you KNOW ..
  13. JLA

    JLA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    18,236
    Location:
    Heart Of Texas
    Good info and advice Jack...
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Ammo & Reloading Forum Interesting finding on 9mm NATO brass Oct 8, 2013
The Ammo & Reloading Forum 9mm Luger and 9mm NATO Mar 4, 2013
The Ammo & Reloading Forum 308/7.62 NATO Brass in stock Feb 4, 2013
The Ammo & Reloading Forum head separation v. normal anatomy Jan 17, 2013
The Ammo & Reloading Forum more free brass questions.. 308/762x51nato Jun 9, 2012