.38 or .380

Discussion in 'Self Defense Tactics & Weapons' started by deinonychus75, Jul 4, 2007.

?

What's your preference - .38 or .380?

  1. .38 Special (+P or not)

    65.3%
  2. .380 ACP (+P or not)

    25.0%
  3. No preference between these two cartridges.

    9.7%
  1. happy1

    happy1 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    11
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ
    My CCW carry is a Taurus 85 Ultra Lite 2 in. loaded either with Glaser safety slugs or Fed. Hydro Shoks
  2. happy1

    happy1 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    11
    Location:
    Surprise, AZ
    Just a thought But you could kill a bear sticking a big stick up his a*s, The hard part would be convincing him he's dead
  3. carver

    carver Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    17,574
    Location:
    DAV, Deep in the Pineywoods of East Texas, just we
    Scudrunner, have you tried the "Smart Carry" system? If not, then go take a look at it at smartcarry.com. I use one myself. I usually am carring a .44 Bull Dog or my 1911A, and I am almost always in shorts and T shirt. Sometimes though I will carry my SP101 or even my .380, mostly depends on where I'm headed to. As for having to make a choice between the .38 and .380, I'd have to go with the .38. IMHO Bigger is better!
  4. patrol

    patrol New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    324
    Location:
    Virginia
    This is a good thread, so I'm gonna keep it going with a comment. I think both calibers have their disadvantages and advantages the advantage to both is the guns that shoot em are small enough that you might actually be willing to leave home with them. A j frame and a slimline Ruger LCP or Keltec is great for a front pocket or as an officers back up gun under his vest or even a homemade neck holster carry Im making one like a necklace to wear under my vest that will rest between my upper chest and the vest. They both are handguns that your wife or female loved one might be willing to carry as well. With todays excellent choice in defensive ammo both will fit the bill as far as ballistics go and both are better to have than nothing.:cool:
  5. Terry_P

    Terry_P New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,513
    Location:
    NH
    Plus getting him to hold still why you did.;)
  6. UncleFudd

    UncleFudd Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    564
    Location:
    Phoenix, Az
    I still find it amusing if not dangerous for so many to worry about the gun and the size of the bullets before doing the most important part of your defensive training, "tactics".
    While running the range and teaching classes as well as attending as many as possible over the past 35 years, I have yet to find a single professional who places caliber over plan, not a single one.

    I also see what passes for ability with firearms on a daily basis and that too is disturbing. Because IMHO, your ability with whatever you choose is second only to your plan or tactics and the gun or size of the gun is dead last in the staying alive and safe equation. And based upon the results I see by seemingly knowledgeable and talented gun handlers, there is much to be learned and practiced to become as good as one must be to deploy ANY firearm big or small in a self defense situation.

    So pardon me if I seem a little puzzled and certainly not knowing the abilities of a single person who has responded to this great thread, but (please be truthful with yourself if not on the forum), how many of you have a plan and have practiced your tactical response to a plethora of possible attack scenarios at all, let alone on a daily and ever occurring basis? (that means every fu@#$Kng day for those of you from Evanston Wy) If you have not and are not doing all of the above, then I suggest that you are not even close to being ready to worry about gun size or caliber.
    For what it is worth, a person with a good plan and super abilities with his tools will "place" a stopping, stunning, debilitating or killing shot with whatever weapon is at hand and this is where all of us should be working to achieve.
    And of course everyone knows all of the old cliches, "hits with little guns are better than misses with big guns or you can't miss fast enough to catch up etc".
    I will say this even at my advanced age, if I have to shoot you, it will be inside of 25 feet and it will not matter which gun I have to use, I will stop you, period but I will not be staying around to see or to take note, that has nothing to do with my plan. In fact unless I really screw up, I am simply NOT going to have to shoot you or anyone else as my plan has almost everything to do with staying aware of my surroundings and avoiding at all cost any involvement with anyone that may even remotely lead to a shooting situation. If for any reason I believe or feel you are a threat I am going to cross the street or get back into my car or go back home or in whatever capacity is necessary, run, not walk away from you. It is only if I fail in all of this that I may have to involve my firearm and then I am going to be moving to cover, screaming at you to get away or leave me alone and getting out of the area while placing my shots into you to make you so uncomfortable you will find some other place to play.

    I appreciate the wound charts that were depicted herein and they are most interesting. But I have been shot, and had to shoot and I do not need a chart to tell me how bad it hurts. Why anyone worries about "stopping power" unless you are a policeman is beyond me. Are you planning to stay in one place to wait and see what your bullet is doing to the BG? If so, WHY?

    I realize this is the ravings of an old man, but I have shared more time in a training session with Clint Smith, Maas Ayoob, Louie Awerback, and Dennis Tueller and even one session with the late and great Jeff Cooper back in the other century and they to a man will tell you much the same as I have briefly written. A whole book can be written about these topics and many have been by some of those I mentioned.
    I honestly do not believe any of them will be standing still nor worrying about the caliber of gun they have or will use as opposed to considering, cover, concealment, egress, communicating and if necessary, placing their shots on target with either hand or both.

    Just thought I would drop by and leave a thought or two. Thank you for the time.
    This seems to be a very good bunch of folks and certainly well meaning at that.
    So please at least consider some of what I have said before you begin to froth and worry over caliber and what the bullets will do if for no other reason than to remember that when they begin to fly, they go BOTH ways and their indiscriminate. And in the first place, if the BG has done something so heinous you can justifiably take him or them under fire, are you even still standing in order to return fire? Can you even get to your gun regardless of caliber? Which hand or arm is shot, stabbed, cut, broken etc so badly in the initial confrontation that you have only one with which to return fire and then can you get to your gun with your remaining hand, operate the safeties or slide or trigger?


    UncleFudd
  7. kilogulf59

    kilogulf59 Former Guest

    Joined:
    May 2, 2008
    Messages:
    177
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    ”I still find it amusing if not dangerous for so many to worry about the gun and the size of the bullets before doing the most important part of your defensive training, "tactics".
    While running the range and teaching classes as well as attending as many as possible over the past 35 years, I have yet to find a single professional who places caliber over plan, not a single one.”


    UncleFudd, I agree with your sentiment and applaud your touting of this common sense line of thinking. However, in all fairness, the thread starter was “What's your preference - .38 or .380?”

    In my opinion, your post is correct, highly valid, and should have the benefit of exposure, why not make this a separate thread under its own title?
  8. getgot

    getgot New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    26
    Location:
    texas
    own noth, .38 2" barrel and a Ruger LCP .380. With the concealed handgun license I find the only way to go with comfort and concealability is Ruger LCP.....hands down. each to their own..that's what makes the world turn.
  9. scudrunner

    scudrunner New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    252
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    First:

    CARVER I really do not like to carry my Ruger LCP in a holster, to me it's just one more thing to mess with when I do not need anything to mess with other than the goblin I am trying to get off of me. I will however, take a look at them, thanks for the suggestion. BTY I traded in both the wife's and my Kel-tec's for the new Ruger LCP's.....wonderful little mouse gun. put over 200rds through each and only one hiccup in each of the new, out of the box pistols. Truthfully, I was amazed.

    Second:

    UNCLEFUDD: We do train / practice with targets as close as 1ft away and shooting from the hip as if to simulate pulling it out of your pocket while in a struggle. I can get 3 shoots off in a hurry with the .380, all within about 4" of each other. IMHO this is plenty good to change just about anyones mind about what they are doing. Even if it doesn't stop them it should weaken them enough to be able to stop the attack by other means.

    HAPPY HOLIDAYS TO ALL!!!! :D
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2008

Share This Page