50K shots to 1kill

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by cycloneman, Feb 16, 2009.

  1. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,418
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Over the past weekend I went to TX to do some hunting and well deserved drinking. At the camp fire a discussion arose about a statistic. I heard that the U.S. military shoots 50K rounds to 1 Kill. Do you think this is true?
  2. Bruce FLinch

    Bruce FLinch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Bay Point, Kali..aka Gun Point
    I had seen some stats a few years back. Compared how many rounds were fired per kill from WWI to Viet Nam. Viet Nam was about 100 times higher round count than WWI.
  3. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,418
    Location:
    Louisiana
    this brings up a good question. Is full auto necessary? I expect yes in a fire fight you need a 30 cal constantly making noise, but what about the guys with 16's? shouldn't they be aiming and using 1 or a 3 shot burst to be more effective. just a thought
  4. ponycar17

    ponycar17 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,053
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Full-autos were originally meant for fire-suppression as I understood it.... Constant thumping from an M60 keeps the bad-guys' heads down and therefore prevents continued casualties on our front. I won't say that the statistics are correct or not (because I don't know) but I would say that constant machine gun fire serves its purpose in today's military. I'd rather pay for the rounds expended than the lives expended.
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2009
  5. 300 H&H

    300 H&H Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,858
    Location:
    Iowa
    "Spray and pray" has been going on for years.:eek: Not that this technique doesn't have meritt in some situations.......;) But is hard on ammo supplies! I have read too about the number of round per kill going way up with semi and full auto arms. 3 shot burst, makes alot of sence. JMHO, Kirk
  6. muddober

    muddober Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,447
    Just a guess would tell me that is true especially when you consider the rate of fire and the amount of Gatling type guns that utilize aircraft plateforms.
  7. LurpyGeek

    LurpyGeek Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,436
    Location:
    UT
    Does this include rounds expended in training?
  8. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,418
    Location:
    Louisiana
    No. I believe the guy that told me this really believes it. Dont know where he got it from. We were drinking and I did not ask. Although he has a daughter in the military.
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2009
  9. Vladimir

    Vladimir New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    3,555
    Location:
    Issaquah WA
    When we were on Pendleton we got a rundown of the different eras of select-fire and how it evolved and why. Don't really have anything to add though :D.
  10. 1shot1k

    1shot1k Former Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    904
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas
    ;);););):cool:

    All good answers and good post. Branches, squads and special details operate as planned out..but all said herein is pretty true.

    Most common sysop or scenario as made public at CURRENT typ sqaud ops is at least (1) is mandatory SAW with members carry addtl ammo fo rhim also...and all trained on SAW type weapon(s)...yes 16 reworked standard now (ive heard and seen ) to 3 shot only with full switched(able) for 1 member only( ive been told ..)
    14 used to have switchable as did 15...

    yes more rounds per kia verified/supposed in vietnam vs WWII is for sure.

    Wont try to know how some of you younguns (if appropriate ) were equipped or what you saw...cause i sure believe you..things always change...some dont....
    small arms operations obviously should show a growth from previously recorded/supposed data...we are not the military country that would want to go backwards in rounds produced or used...but remember...vietnam- type of fighting and terrain...completely foilage encompassed...when you dont see..they sprayed...hell. ive guilty of kickin my ass backward pushin my boots to keep kickin backward and if so armed..doin my damnest to imitate a "groundspooky" one hand on trigger and other searchin for mags.....
    but for the most part...that I guess will have changed me forever it was one round at a time that or the confirmed on call in that stays with you..and I dont mean in a bad way..but ..anyway onbetter thinkin..I also believe when you study numbers of arial ordnance on vietnam vs WWII..more in WWII but the concentration
    and effectiveness (when it was done proper ) by our B52's..is little known or remembered by many...some of the devastation I just dont think majority of peoples would be able to take it in just on paper....
    my good friend Fred ( gone now) was my 1st boss at company where I sold/oversaw the prison security fence systems Ive talked about..that firm was started by bunch of retired SAC fellows.some directly were involved with the "blackbird " and when it woul dcome to Carswell in the old days..we'd be lookin thru the fence
    bigeyed at it..and some of these dudes could open their wallet and be allowed to just walk up and stand in the fuel drippin out of her seams...anyway old FRED..30 yr arforce...tailgunner/specialist for most of those..and durin the 12 years I worked with him h woul dhave bouts with his nerves so bad..least twice a year..be in VA and me and others would come up and visit when allowed and he liked the small model plane kits we found that assembled with no glue and brough him smokes and such.....anyway he saw a seating chartthing you know where they show your seats to buy..it was for TExas Stadium (cowboys) and if I remmeber held about 70 thousand something..and he was seen that one day and had a breakdown and fell ...he later told me when he could how it hit him as he rememberd some combined nummbers from some campaigns/sortie or mission structures and such and he just couldnttake it...as the tailgunner he had just seen so much...

    anyway I just ramble but dont mean to..just tryin to be discussing and chattin. Sure helps me and am sure have offended some others..just see my handle and skip over reply if u want or let me know and ill stop. I just lie to chat with good people..sure helps me..

    :cool: Anyway Cycloneman,in direct answer to the wording of your initial post...

    yes ..and maybe in general on occasion and lately...but not always...I dont have the handle
    because its vouge or catchy...................:cool:
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2009
  11. noslolo

    noslolo New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,563
    Location:
    Johnstown PA
    Please tell us how you really feel 1shot1k... just a joke! Glad to see you posting.
  12. 1shot1k

    1shot1k Former Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    904
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas
    :p:p:p:cool:

    Hello noslolo..hope all well..:)..

    Im crazty I guess..wake up and laptop near bed...msoke and type..sure like all the fine people here at TFF...

    as to "how I feel " :) old joke used to be one would say.."why with my hands " :)..but heck I cant trust tham anymore...

    example: friday night got up to go bathroom ya know...light was out.well...what can Isay.........I actually grabbed my "THUMB " of my right hand by mistake...

    wife made me mop saturday morninn,,,,,:eek::eek::(
  13. carver

    carver Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    17,878
    Location:
    DAV, Deep in the Pineywoods of East Texas, just we
    I don't know for a fact that the numbers quoted are correct or not, but I'm sure it's high. The military was using the M-14, that did have a select fire switch that would allow only 3 or 4 shot bursts with each pull of the trigger. The reasoning was that after the second or third shot was fired the rifle was no longer on target, and any rounds fired after that were just waste. I remember reading somewhere a long time ago that the police used to shot an average of 2 or 3 shots per shooting back in the days when they all carried revolvers. The numbers went way up to around 12, or something like that when they all started carring semi-autos. Spray and Pray! Don't count on any of my numbers being right, my memory ain't what it used to be.
  14. cosmo05

    cosmo05 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    51
    Viet Nam was 2200 rds per kill with full auto 16s, now it's 50,000, and with three rounds bursts? Something is wrong with that number. I don't believe it.
  15. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,418
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Thanks for your input. After reading this i did some reasearch and found this. According to the source some 3000 rounds of small arms fire to one kill.
    Now if I can only find the accurate number for today's wars.

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_was_the_ammo_to_kill_ratio_in_the_Vietnam_war
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
General Discussion A scary report on flu shots Oct 21, 2014
General Discussion Lib Radio Host Threatens to Call Police, Claim 'Shots Fired' Jun 21, 2014
General Discussion Message to JLA and other crack shots Dec 24, 2013
General Discussion Why do gunshots in movies sound so weak and fake these days? Jul 13, 2013
General Discussion Impossible shots Jul 11, 2013

Share This Page