Ann Coulter on Cain allegations

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by Juker, Nov 14, 2011.

  1. Juker

    Juker New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,872
    Location:
    Land of Lincoln
    Mighty good read ...


    David Axelrod's Pattern of Sexual Misbehavior
    by Ann Coulter
    11/09/2011



    Herman Cain​ has spent his life living and working all over the country -- Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. -- but never in Chicago.


    So it's curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod​.

    Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA).

    The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA. And strangely enough, Cain's short, three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career during which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator.

    After O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain's personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them -- by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.)

    And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of ... Chicago.

    Herman Cain has never lived in Chicago. But you know who has? David Axelrod! And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building? Right again: Cain's latest accuser, Sharon Bialek.

    Bialek's accusations were certainly specific. But they also demonstrated why anonymous accusations are worthless.

    Within 24 hours of Bialek's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a "gold-digger," that she was constantly in financial trouble -- having filed for personal bankruptcy twice -- and, of course, that she had lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lake Shore Drive, where, she admits, she knew the man The New York Times calls Obama's "hired muscle."

    Throw in some federal tax evasion, and she's Obama's next Cabinet pick.

    The reason all this is relevant is that both Axelrod and Daley have a history of smearing political opponents by digging up claims of sexual misconduct against them.

    John Brooks, Chicago's former fire commissioner, filed a lawsuit against Daley six months ago claiming Daley threatened to smear him with sexual harassment accusations if Brooks didn't resign. He resigned -- and the sexual harassment allegations were later found to be completely false.

    Meanwhile, as extensively detailed in my book Guilty: Liberal 'Victims' and Their Assault on America, the only reason Obama became a U.S. senator -- allowing him to run for president -- is that David Axelrod pulled sealed divorce records out of a hat, first, against Obama's Democratic primary opponent, and then against Obama's Republican opponent.

    One month before the 2004 Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate, Obama was way down in the polls, about to lose to Blair Hull, a multimillionaire securities trader.

    But then The Chicago Tribune -- where Axelrod used to work -- began publishing claims that Hull's second ex-wife, Brenda Sexton, had sought an order of protection against him during their 1998 divorce proceedings.

    From then until Election Day, Hull was embroiled in fighting the allegation that he was a "wife beater." He and his ex-wife eventually agreed to release their sealed divorce records. His first ex-wife, daughters and nanny defended him at a press conference, swearing he was never violent. During a Democratic debate, Hull was forced to explain that his wife kicked him and he had merely kicked her back.

    Hull's substantial lead just a month before the primary collapsed with the nonstop media attention to his divorce records. Obama sailed to the front of the pack and won the primary. Hull finished third with 10 percent of the vote.

    Luckily for Axelrod, Obama's opponent in the general election had also been divorced.

    The Republican nominee was Jack Ryan, a graduate of Dartmouth and Harvard law and business schools, who had left his lucrative partnership at Goldman Sachs​ to teach at an inner-city school on the South Side of Chicago.
    But in a child custody dispute some years earlier, Ryan's ex-wife, Hollywood sex kitten Jeri Lynn Ryan​, had alleged that, while the couple was married, Jack had taken her to swingers clubs in Paris and New York.

    Jack Ryan adamantly denied the allegations. In the interest of protecting their son, he also requested that the records be put permanently under seal.

    Axelrod's courthouse moles obtained the "sealed" records and, in no time, they were in the hands of every political operative in Chicago. Knowing perfectly well what was in the records, Chicago Tribune attorneys flew to California and requested that the court officially "unseal" them -- over the objections of both Jack and Jeri Ryan​.

    Your honor, who knows what could be in these records!

    A California judge ordered them unsealed, which allowed newspapers to publish the salacious allegations, and four days later, Ryan dropped out of the race under pressure from idiot Republicans (who should be tracked down and shot).

    With a last-minute replacement of Alan Keyes as Obama's Republican opponent, Obama was able to set an all-time record in an Illinois Senate election, winning with a 43 percent margin.

    And that's how Obama became a senator four years after losing a congressional race to Bobby Rush​. (In a disastrous turn of events, Rush was not divorced.)

    Axelrod destroyed the only two men who stood between Obama and the Senate with illicitly obtained, lurid allegations from their pasts.

    In 2007, long after Obama was safely ensconced in the U.S. Senate, The New York Times reported: "The Tribune reporter who wrote the original piece (on Hull's sealed divorce records) later acknowledged in print that the Obama camp had 'worked aggressively behind the scenes' to push the story."

    Some had suggested, the Times article continued, that Axelrod had "an even more significant role -- that he leaked the initial story."

    This time, Obama's little helpers have not only thrown a bomb into the Republican primary, but are hoping to destroy the man who deprives the Democrats of their only argument in 2012: If you oppose Obama, you must be a racist.
  2. Gun Geezer

    Gun Geezer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,030
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Who would've believed it? That Chicago and Daley's slimy arms of political corruption could reach so far and wide. It's a shame there's not enough honest, non-partisan good politicians to wipe out the cancer that seems incurable. Even the dead vote the wrong way!
  3. carver

    carver Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    16,306
    Location:
    DAV, Deep in the Pineywoods of East Texas, just we
    While this is a good article, you won't see it on evening TV. And I am not surprised at all that these low life scum bags would do such a thing as smear someone!
  4. dad2thebone

    dad2thebone New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,357
    Thats the sad truth about politics these days. Make the other guy look bad because you cant win on your own merit. sad as it is thats what it's come to and we have to put lowlifes in office who do this crud.
  5. ofitg

    ofitg New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,446
    If you can't argue against a candidate's position on the issues, attack his character.
  6. 45nut

    45nut Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,462
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    I was discussing this with my folks this weekend and my Dad was saying, well, there's 5 women saying this, some part of it must be true. I replied, well Dad, they could all be lying too. I asked him, do you think libs and other republicans that want Cain out wouldn't lie, cheat and steal to put other candidates out of the race?

    Well, I don't know he replies. I, for one, know that when the liberal media starts hammering one conservative candidate over all the others, that is the candidate they fear the most.

    Remember when Obozo said Mit Romney would make a great opponent? Doesn't that tell you that Obozo thinks he can beat Romney or at least he would have a better chance with Romney as opposed to Cain or Perry?

    Bottom line, when the lame stream media reports one particular Conservative is a he-man woman hater, do you believe them? Heck no.
  7. Juker

    Juker New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,872
    Location:
    Land of Lincoln
    I remember that Ryan debacle well - it was just bizarre. He dropped out, and the GOP shipped in Alan Keyes. Big mistake - Keyes is one of the best minds on the planet, and they wasted him in this race. Then we got Odrama, whom we had never heard of prior to that.
  8. Marlin T

    Marlin T Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,888
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Sounds like something straight from Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky

  9. gcalloway

    gcalloway New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    88
    Location:
    Atlanta
    I love Ann, she speaks what is on her mind. I personnally do not like any politician. It has been years since I voted for someone I wanted to win instead of againist someone I wanted to lose. It matters not who the Republicans eventily rund againast Obama I will vote for them, but then i would vote for a rusty tomato can againist Obama.
  10. Claudius Valarium

    Claudius Valarium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    470
    Location:
    So. Central TX, AKA the Middle of Flyover Country
    This is straight out of the progressive playbook. They will never win on the merits of the argument. It doesn't make sense to the critical thinker and the progressive will never convince him / her otherwise. So, attack the character traits they will, yes.
  11. Claudius Valarium

    Claudius Valarium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    470
    Location:
    So. Central TX, AKA the Middle of Flyover Country
    If the shoe fits . . .
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Ann Coulter Apr 18, 2012
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Ann Coulter was right..... Oct 9, 2009
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Ann Coulter on Sarah Palin Jul 10, 2009
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Ann Coulter on Sotomayor Jul 2, 2009
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Ann Coulter upsets Howie and the DNC Mar 3, 2007

Share This Page