Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by WAGCEVP, Jul 13, 2003.


    WAGCEVP New Member

    May 25, 2003


    Letting Teachers Pack Guns Will Make America's Schools Safer

    By John R. Lott Jr.
    John R. Lott Jr., a resident scholar at the American Enterprise
    Institute, is the author of the newly released "The Bias Against Guns"
    (Regnery, 2003).

    July 13, 2003

    Banning guns from schools seems the obvious way to keep children safe.
    Utah, though, is doing the opposite, and is stirring up debate across
    the nation.

    Acting under a new state law, school districts across Utah have started
    drawing up regulations allowing teachers and other public employees to
    carry concealed guns on school property. Opponents are still trying to
    fight the law, and at first glance their concern about firearms in
    schools is understandable. Last Sunday in New Jersey, an attack by armed
    teenagers against three fellow students and randomly chosen townspeople
    was narrowly averted.

    But that's not the whole picture. Consider an analogy: Suppose a
    criminal is stalking you or your family. Would you feel safe putting a
    sign in front of your home saying, "This Home Is a Gun-Free Zone"?
    Law-abiding citizens might be pleased by such a sign, but to criminals
    it would be an invitation.

    In 1985, just eight states had right-to-carry laws — laws that
    automatically grant permits for concealed weapons once applicants pass a
    criminal background check, pay their fees and, when required, complete a
    training class. Today, 35 states do.

    Examining all the multiple-victim public shootings in the United States
    from 1977 to 1999 shows that on average, states that adopt
    right-to-carry laws experience a 60% drop in the rates at which the
    attacks occur, and a 78% drop in the rates at which people are killed or
    injured from such attacks.

    To the extent such attacks still occurred in right-to-carry states, they
    overwhelmingly take place in so-called "gun-free zones." Indeed, the
    attack last week in Meridian, Miss., in which five people were killed
    took place in a Lockheed Martin plant where employees were forbidden to
    have guns.

    The effect of right-to-carry laws is greater on multiple-victim public
    shootings than on other crimes for a simple reason: Increasing the
    probability that someone will be able to protect himself improves
    deterrence. Though it may be statistically unlikely that any single
    person in a crowd is carrying a concealed handgun, the probability that
    at least one person is armed is high.

    Contrary to many people's impressions, before the federal law was
    enacted in 1995 it was possible for teachers and other adults with
    concealed-handgun permits to carry guns on school property in many

    Many of the concerns about accidents and other problems are unwarranted.
    The real problems at schools occurred only after the ban. The rash of
    student shootings at schools began in October 1997 in Pearl, Miss.

    Public reaction against guns is understandable, given the horrific
    events shown on TV. But the more than 2 million times each year that
    Americans use guns defensively are never discussed. In more than 90% of
    those cases, simply brandishing a weapon is sufficient to cause a
    criminal to break off an attack. My research also shows that citizens
    with guns helped stop about a third of the post-1997 public school
    shootings, stepping in before uniformed police could arrive.

    Last year, news broadcasts on the three main TV networks carried about
    190,000 words on gun crime stories. Not one segment featured a civilian
    using a gun to stop a crime. Newspapers are not much better.

    Police are extremely important in deterring crime, but they almost
    always arrive after the crime has been committed. Annual surveys of
    crime victims in the United States by the Justice Department show that
    when confronted by a criminal, people are safest if they have a gun.

    Just as the threat of arrest and prison can deter criminals, so can the
    fact that victims can defend themselves.

    For multiple-victim shootings, the biggest factor determining the amount
    of harm is the length of time between when an attack starts and when
    someone with a gun can stop the attack. The longer the delay, the more
    are harmed.

    Good intentions do not necessarily make good laws. What counts is
    whether the laws ultimately save lives. Unfortunately, too many gun laws
    primarily disarm law-abiding citizens, not criminals.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum South Dakota house passes bill allowing teachers to be armed Jan 30, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Louisiana restaurant draws business with discount for armed diners Oct 1, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Questions on traveling while armed Jul 10, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum why good people should be armed Dec 3, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Why do liberals and their minions want 5 million armed and able criminals added to ou Jan 3, 2013

Share This Page