Australian Gun Ban

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by nevadal, Aug 3, 2012.

  1. nevadal

    nevadal New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    130
    Location:
    Nevada
  2. firefighter1635

    firefighter1635 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    2,968
    Location:
    FEMA Region V
    Discusting :bleh:. Jack knows all too well.
  3. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,600
    Location:
    Australia
    yup

    dont forget all the 200,000+ who became criminals thanks to these laws

    good law abiding folks who could not have a govt job after the charges .. folks who's whole livelyhood was destroyed by these anti gunners in their quest for power over all of us but when 4 million folks say enough they did back off some

    it took some of the anti gunners to dissappear , never to be found , but we got em to back off ..

    and now we are fighting back and winning , but its taken 17 years to get this far ..
  4. Thorisin

    Thorisin New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    124
    Location:
    Southern California
    Yeah, I heard the stories from the Aussies when I was in China. Funny thing was that once they found out I was a firearm owner they wanted do talk about guns A LOT.

    Typical question after talking abuot guns "hey, when I come to the US and visit you can we go shooting?"

    They all had a deep interest in firearms. At least the guys I worked with did.
  5. Thorisin

    Thorisin New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    124
    Location:
    Southern California
    Seriously, did this happen?
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2012
  6. skullfr

    skullfr New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    902
    Location:
    Beaumont,Texas
    that has always been the results of such stupidity.
  7. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,600
    Location:
    Australia
    yes , it happened , we think they went for a swim drunk , the lefties call all sorts of theories , but they left wallets and phones etc with their friend in the pub .. sad thing is young folks go to pubs near beaches and go for a swim , night time is when most sharks feed .. ( pre dawn and dusk mostly) but tigers prowl all night , i caught enough night fishing for jewfish ..

    those who dont get took often get caught in our rip's , and drunk ? no chance , they're hard enough to get out of sober and in daylight ..

    get a marine stinger into the equation .. they too are mainly night time predators ..

    yeah its bloody dangerous .. and stupid but hey blame the shooters .. for their stupidity ..
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2012
  8. skullfr

    skullfr New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    902
    Location:
    Beaumont,Texas
    Ive watched enough Nat Geo to know you dont swim in Australia.salt crocks bull shark sting ray.Ill stick with snapping turtles and gators.
  9. Thorisin

    Thorisin New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    124
    Location:
    Southern California
    Oh, I see.

    Thats more of someone trying to manufacture something. I thought that someone dissapeared some of the anti gun nuts.
  10. Thorisin

    Thorisin New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    124
    Location:
    Southern California
    Yeah, the Aussies I worked with told me how nasty "salties" were. Gaurenteed I wouldnt go swiming in OZ :)
  11. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,600
    Location:
    Australia
    they tried to make it look like the islamic dissappearences here .. never flew ..

    three drunk idiots who did not know the basics , its taught in all schools here as kids along with how to swim classes ( thats mandatory here from age 5)

    dont need sharks here either , a school of tailor ( related to your bluefish) will clean someone up real fast , not as bad as piranah but theres maybe a million in a school .. its just as bad
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2012
  12. Jerryboy

    Jerryboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    Virginia
    i just have to ask, Jack: how could you guys turn in your guns like that? there should've been war in the streets! you should've grabbed your guns and headed downtown and lynched the people who passed these laws! why just surrender like that?
  13. time2shoot

    time2shoot Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,033
    Location:
    Brandon SD
    Dude dont go there.
  14. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,600
    Location:
    Australia
    fair question asked politely


    its started long ago , we where founded as a penal colony , convicts

    no guns for us ...

    guards where marines .. british royal marines .. no playing games with them and we stayed that way until gold was found ,

    we had three classes gentry settlers and convicts , and even then only the gentry had guns , settlers where allowed small arms in rifles and shot guns but hand guns under Uk rule have always been contentious ..

    but times passed and we had things sorted

    the average aussie had a shotty or .22 or .303 under the bed crime happened but to other folks elsewhere who where mainly in crime themselves ..

    then we joined the UN holus bolus ...

    ( 1962 we became full members them in our business us supposedly in theirs , dont work that way though )

    and the push was on

    when the shooting at port arthur happened the anti wherevreadyb , the Un was ready and they passed laws and statutes in 2 weeks and had drafts ready in 2 days

    impossible here

    but they did it , ( later we find lobbyists and the UN folks had been work on this for years and justy waiting for a port arthur)

    we had no choice

    so when folks did stand up like my mate Rod

    we had protests we had petitions we met with government ministers ( i was away in cambodia when all this happened but we as in shooters)

    and then some folks got shot

    rod ansell was one , a good mate of mine , closer to family than not ..

    a few folks in each state shot , the leaders mainly , then folks got arrested and their wives and kids too as accessories ..

    even professor julius sumner miller ( professor wonderful from disney ) my old pysics prof he refused to hand over his 1911 , they locked him up and after 6 days locked his wife and threatened to lock his daughters up too

    he gave in

    and most do

    they dont come for you with a swat team but 2 guy's in suits who go to your job and speak to your boss who calls you in and they step out say hi and cuff you ... they got my father this way and 200,000 others over 3 months ..

    280,000 aussies where made criminals just by asking if they could keep their family property .. as a starting point for crimes

    they pull you over like a traffic stop as before they take the guns they'll make you all get ID for em licences or registration or something , its later they'll come , you'll be asked to come to the rear of your car , be cuffed then put into the back of a cop car and processed , no-one will know until you get to call home .. no defiant fightback , no last stands ( or a few where made but written off in the media as loonies)

    when the masses see this and realise what happening and that their wives and kids could be criminals ..

    they hand over their guns , take the cash and walk away ( knowing they buried half of em and all their ammo )


    the years before that we call the thinning or the pollite gun control

    that took 450,000 guns alone

    they made you gun licence or gun registration connected to everything else parking fines , speeding fines , overdue library books , non payment saw your gun permits canceled , they got 500,000 folks this way before the gun take back happened

    and i'll bet they'll do the exact same thing there ( in the US of A ) before they make the same move
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2012
  15. Jerryboy

    Jerryboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    Virginia
    wow, Jack, just wow.:eek: i seriously hope they kill me before i see that happen here.:mad::mad:
  16. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,600
    Location:
    Australia
    thats exactly what they are lining up for you there ...

    prediction for the USA in 20 years if obama gets in again and no one opposes this BS ..

    instead of pawn shops everywhere there'll be abortion clinics all over

    guns will be banned but one of the most common black market items , made to order in some cases they'll be freely available to criminals

    the police state that is created to get all paper work on gun and explosive materials the censorship by the authorities of facts , of denials of islamist take overs in whole towns etc

    how do i know ? without the fight back that would be us now .. and you aint that far behind and i dont see you organising ...

    i do see them organising against all you folks though

    now just to remind you all who you are fighting, this from a couple years ago ...



    The Regulatory Czar – Cass Sunstein
    Sunstein was nominated and approved to be Obama’s “Regulatory Czar.” He supports massive gun control and doesn’t believe the 2nd Amendment is an individual right. He has straight out said, “We ought to ban hunting.” While this fruitcake strips Americans of their Constitutional right to own guns, he wants to give rights to animals and has argued that “Animals should be permitted to bring suit…” Naturally, he also supports the “Fairness Doctrine,” the wrongly-named concept which allows the government to regulate the airwaves.


    Climate Czar – Todd Stern

    Stern, a veteran of the Clinton administration, was the U.S. negotiator at the Kyoto conference in 1997 (which called for dramatic climate change regulations based on bogus assumptions.) Had the treaty been implemented, it would have plunged the world into economic chaos.
    Since then, new evidence has revealed that the major climate models used to justify the Global Warming alarm was, in fact, not accurate. One would think Stern would address this, but chances are he won’t. Climate change seems to be more about giving the government control over our lives, than about phony climate crises. Indeed, Stern has made it clear that he thinks international agencies, such as the United Nations, should take the lead on forcing climate change down the throats of national governments. Stern has even gone as far as to propose that world powers form an “E8” group, who would meet yearly and dictate environmental policy to the rest of the world. What about national sovereignty? Clearly, Stern feels that’s an outdated concept.
    Stern is also the nutcase behind the Cap and Trade proposal which, even an analysis by Obama’s own Treasury Department concluded, would cost American taxpayers up to $200 billion dollars—just what we need for today’s economy!


    Science Czar – John Holdren
    In his book, Holdren advocates some of the most bizarre and horrifying policy stances imaginable. In the event of a “over-population crises,” Holdren supports “laws requiring compulsory abortion,” government confiscation of new born babies, the “development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin,” and, incredibly, “adding a sterilant to drinking water or stable foods….” as long a livestock would not be affected (as experimentally implemented in India). Holdren wants the government to dictate family size and advocate a “planetary regime,” run by the United Nations. This real life Dr. Frankenstein will be deciding science policy for the United States of America.


    Chief Diversity Officer, Federal Communications Commission – Mark Lloyd
    While Obama is playing coy with his plans to shut down conservative talk radio, we know what his real intentions are, due to his appointment of Mark Lloyd. Lloyd’s view of the 1st Amendment is shocking:
    “It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press.
    This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references
    to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination
    of other communications policies. “[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect
    global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance.”
    Like many of Obama’s appointees, Lloyd worked for George Soros, the foreign billionaire who funds anti-America groups. He seems to be enamored with dictators and has even publicly praised Venezuelan Communist dictator Hugo Chavez’s “incredible…democratic revolution.” He also wants to use the Fairness Doctrine to “balance” talk radio and believes there are too many white people in the media. He has written that unless there are “more people of color, gays and other people…we will not change the problem.” One of his solutions to “balance” the media is to fine conservative radio stations up to $250 million and give the proceeds to National Public Radio. Get ready for censorship like America has never seen before.

    Attorney General – Eric Holder
    Like most of Obama’s appointees, Holder is a member of the American Constitution Society, a ACLU-type group dedicated to destroying much the Constitution in order to make it “relevant” to the modern world. And as with many Obama’s appointees, he is obsessed with race, even to the point of refusing to pursue the prosecution of two Black Panther thugs who intimidated white voters at a polling place. The thugs were screaming things at the voters such as, “You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.” If whites had harassing blacks at a polling place, they would still be sitting in a jail within days. Nevertheless, Holder apparently doesn’t mind undermining the democratic process.

    He is currently challenging the rights of states to enact citizen verification procedures previously approved by two federal courts. In other words, Holder wants to make it easier for illegal aliens to vote, which also happens to be ACORN’s goal. This comes as no surprise; Holder has been undermining the rule of law for most of his career. While serving as the #2 official in Clinton’s Justice Department, Holder was the driving force behind the effort to pardon members of the notorious Puerto Rican terrorist group, FALN, a group that engaged in over 130 attacks in the USA, killing six people. By refusing to carry out justice against the Black Panthers and the Hispanic FALN terrorists, he was clearly pandering to these two racial groups for political reasons. So this is what Obama’s Justice Department will be all about: racial pandering first and justice last. Speaking at an ACS convention last November, Holder announced that America would soon be “run by progressives.” At least he’s honest.

    Deputy Attorney General – David OgdenThis appointment must have been a favor for the porn industry; Ogden has probably done more than anyone in America to defend the “rights” of pornographers. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said Ogden “is more than just a lawyer who has had a few unsavory clients. He has devoted a substantial part of his career, case after case, for 20 years, in defense of pornography.” For example, he argued in support of the American Library Association when they went to court to challenge mandatory anti-obscenity internet filters in school libraries. Incredibly, the ALA/Ogden position was that libraries should be free-speech zones in which school children should have the right to access anything they want – even pornography – on school computers.
    This comes as no surprise, when Ogden was an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, he argued on constitutional grounds to strike down the conviction of a defendant who received and possessed child pornography. Ogden believes there is a constitutional right to possess child pornography. The appointment of Ogden is apparently what Obama means when he talks about promoting “family values.”
    Solicitor General – Elena Kagan
    Elena Kagan has also been mentioned by the Obama forces as the next nomination to the Supreme Court. This is ironic considering her complete lack of judicial or appellate experience. She has never even been a judge or argued before the Supreme Court! Kagen has served as the Dean of Harvard Law School, but her job was to fundraise and make the students “comfortable.” As the Boston Globe writes, “Some of her initial acts as dean were small-scale improvements, like offering free coffee in classroom buildings and free tampons in women’s bathrooms.” Isn’t that nice!

    However, the few legal views she holds are certainly far from the mainstream. She described the “don’t ask, don’t tell” homosexual military policy adopted by President Clinton as “a profound wrong – a moral injustice of the first order,” and favors homosexuals being allowed to openly serve in the military. She argued that it was unconstitutional for Congress to withhold funds from colleges that banned military recruiters and she even took it upon herself to ban military recruiters from Harvard because of their policy regarding homosexuals. Clearly, her lesbianism has clearly created a bias that affects her shallow legal views. Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel – Dawn Johnson
    Johnson is the former legal director for the National Abortion Rights Action League, a group on the extreme left of the abortion debate. They oppose any restrictions on abortion for any reason, at any time of pregnancy—even late term abortions. She has also worked for the ACLU. Johnson has argued that abortion is all about “sexual freedom.” That’s right: have sex with whoever you want and whenever you want and if you get pregnant, get an abortion. This same mentality has led to skyrocketing sexual disease rates, unwanted pregnancies, and untold sorrow. In a brief filed while working with NARAL,Johnson cited a source that said forcing women to bear children was “disturbingly suggestive of involuntary servitude, prohibited by the 13th Amendment, in that forced pregnancy requires a woman to provide continuous physical service to the fetus in order to further the state’s asserted interest.” In other words, being pregnant is comparable to being a slave.

    Secretary, Department of Education – Arne Duncan
    Obama appointed Duncan due to his alleged success as CEO of Chicago’s public schools. However, in 2007, only 10% of black 4thgraders in Chicago reached the proficiency level in reading and for black 8th graders, only 9% reached reading proficiency. In math, only 8% of black students reached proficiency in 4th grade and just 6% reached proficiency in 8th grade. This was the disappointing outcome, despite spending $13-$14,000 per student and is among the highest of any major city.Even worse, a majority of Chicago public school students drop out or fail to graduate with their class. Needless to say, the Duncan era was a disaster. He did, however, pursue an aggressive agenda to promote the homosexual lifestyle in the schools. So Chicago kids can’t read or write, but they all know how to engage in homosexual sex. If anyone tells you Duncan is an “education reformer,” tell them you’re the tooth fairy.

    Assistant Deputy Secretary, Department of Education – Kevin Jennings
    Jennings is the founder of the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a group dedicated to promoting the homosexual agenda to school children as young as five. They’re sick people and even promote books that feature adult-child sex in a favorable way. Regardless, Obama must have been impressed with Jennings, as he appointed him to carry out his perverted mission nationwide in his new role as head of the Department’s “Office of Safe & Drug Free Schools.”
    The reality is that homosexuality is not safe; it takes years off the average lifespan of males. But for Obama, is not really about safety; it’s about keeping the homosexual community happy—after all, they helped elect him. Jennings has been in the press lately due to revelations that he gave encouraging advice to a boy who privately confessed to him he was having sex with an older man. And what was Jennings’s advice? Buy a condom. Parents, start monitoring what your schools are teaching your children. It’s going to get ugly. Foreign Policy

    United States Ambassador to United Nations – Susan Rice
    Even though she served on the National Security Council under President Clinton, Rice seems to have slept through the last two decades. She is fanatically pro-UN and wants the United States to work closely with the United Nations in order to carry out all kinds of humanitarian and military actions, seeming unaware that the UN has never been supportive of US interests. They don’t stop wars; they don’t sanction terrorist regimes, and their internal corruption is so pervasive they can’t even carry out humanitarian missions. But rather than hold the UN responsible for its obvious failings over the years, Rice blamed Bush for being “unilateral” and for “stiff-arming our partners.” She even sits on the board of the UN Fund for UNICEF, an agency which has been repeatedly caught giving aid to terrorists, and during the Cold War, assisting communist insurgents.
    More seriously, she is overly cautious in regard to fighting terrorism. The former Ambassador to Sudan implicated Rice as the person who bungled the opportunity to take out Osama bin Laden when Sudanese officials offered him to the USA on a silver platter during the Clinton years.
    She rejected their offer. There’s a good chance 9/11 could have been avoided if Rice had accepted the Sudanese offer. Apparently, even though she worked for the NSC, she didn’t regard Al-Qaeda as a threat. No wonder we were hit on 9/11. And now she’s our UN Ambassador? I wonder whose interests she will serve…probably the UNs.

    Counsel, State Department – Harold Koh
    The man Obama has named as the State Department’s legal advisor is Harold Koh. Koh believes America should defer to the International Court of Justice to determine legal precedents; a totally unconstitutional endeavor. He is a member of the “trans-nationalism” school of legal thought that believes all distinctions between American Constitutional law and international law should vanish. Incredibly, he even believes Muslim law –Sharia law– should be applied to some disputes in US courts. Clearly, his views are in contradiction to the Constitution he swore to uphold, but no matter, he is now in charge of all legal issues for the U.S. State Department.






    National Security Council – Samantha Power
    Power is an anti-Israel pseudo intellectual, a strange position given that Israel is our top ally in the Middle East. She holds the view that until Israel allows Palestine to set up a separate state, all the other problems in the Middle East will remain. This, of course, ignores the 1,300 year old war of conquest waged by Islam against the West, most of it occurring long before the modern day Israel/Palestine conflict. She also holds to the conspiratorial view that everything America does in the Middle East – like the Iraq war – is due to Israeli influence.Finally, she pooh-poohs the idea that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, a thoroughly discredited view in light of recent events. While she opposed sending troops to Iraq – she called it an “occupation”—she favored sending US troops to Israel to forcibly impose a Palestinian state. Power’s writing grossly exaggerates “war crimes” committed by Israel and never condemns terrorist activity by the Palestinians. The last thing we need in the midst of war between the West and Islamic terrorism is a nut on the NSC giving the President advice favoring our enemies.

    Advisor, Under-Secretary of Defense for Policy – Rosa BrooksThis genius wrote that Al-Qaeda was just an “obscure group” until America began the war on terrorism, ignoring all the documentation that Al-Qaeda was making plans for rapid growth long before 9/11. Apparently, it’s America’s fault that terrorist groups exist today! She called President Bush “our torturer in chief” and compared Bush’s anti-terrorist policies to Hitler’s policies. Clearly, she ignored the fact that Bush’s policies were responsible for stopping over 17 different terrorist plots against the United States. She also called the successful surge in Iraq a “feckless plan” and seems completely blind to the successes we have had in the war on terrorism. But we shouldn’t be surprised; she used to work for a foundation funded by the foreign America-hater George Soros. It’s hard to believe Brooks is now deciding defense policy.


    White House Staff
    Senior Advisor and Assistant to the President for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs – Valerie Jarrett
    Jarrett is involved with vetting all the extremists Obama has appointed and thus, has to be an extremist as well. For example, she was aware that former Green Czar Van Jones (who withdrew) had a long history of involvement in Communist Party causes, but still said she was “delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House.” She had to have known, because she married into a family with a pedigree of Communist Party involvement. Her father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, worked closely with Obama mentor and Communist Party leader Frank Marshall Davis in a number of Communist Party front groups during the Cold War years. Valerie married Vernon’s son in 1983 and later became chief of staff for Mayor Richard Daley, where she was a key player in perhaps America’s most corrupt big city political machine. Obama does not go forward with anything without her counsel.

    Political advisor – David AxelrodFor those who think Axelrod is just a good campaign consultant, you couldn’t be more wrong. Axelrod has a long history of working for obscure socialist candidates and Obama was no different, politically, from his other clients. In fact, promoting socialist causes was a family tradition. His mother wrote for a New York City tabloid called PM Magazine, which often promoted the Communist Party line. Indeed, author IF Stone, later revealed to be working for the KGB, was PM’s DC correspondent. Much of the tabloid’s funding came from Marshall Field, a hard left millionaire who also funded Saul Alinsky’s training school. Axelrod has spent his entire life promoting extremist candidates, but no one bothered to look into his background. Today, he advises Obama on all things political.



    Director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change – Carol Browner
    Browner previously served as head of the EPA during the Clinton regime where she advocated incredibly stupid environmental regulations that destroyed entire industries. At a time when America is losing jobs in record numbers, she is precisely the right person for the Obama job-killing machine. Browner is a socialist and was picked by Socialist International to be one of 14 leaders of a group it created called the Commission for a Sustainable World Society. SI believes in massive wealth redistribution from the West to the Third World, choosing to ignore the evidence that Third World countries are poor due to their socialist policies.
    Moreover, SI constantly attacks the free market in general and the United States in particular. The fact that Obama has chosen both Browner and Todd Stern (Climate Czar) does not bode well for the American economy. The recent disclosure that the climate models used by Browner and Stern to justify draconian new regulations – such as Cap and Trade – are based on inaccurate data, has not fazed the Obama administration one bit. For Obama, environmentalism is a tool for increasing government control and nothing else.

    General Counsel and Senior Policy Advisor, Office of Management & Budget – Preeta Bansal
    Bansal is very close to Obama; she acts behind the scenes advising him regarding the selection of federal judges. She is on the far left side of the judicial spectrum and is a leader of the misnamed American Constitutional Society, a group that believes in a “living Constitution” and works to “debunk” the “original intent” concept. Indeed, ACS’s view that the Constitution should constantly change undermines the very purpose for having a constitution. Needless to say, the ACS is obsessed with criminal rights, illegal alien rights, terrorist rights, and other phony rights. ACS is America’s main networking group for far-left attorneys and is where Bansal is recruiting many of Obama’s judicial nominees.
    Bansal is also a member of the “critical race theory (CRT)” school of legal thought that boils all legal concepts down to racist conspiracies and that racism permeates all aspects of American society. Indeed, she even co-authored a paper claiming that republicanism is based upon racist consensus. In other words, she believes the entire concept of representative democracy is based upon racist assumptions. Indeed, CRT advocates even believe the founding of America was primarily due to racial motivations.
    Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals called CRT supporters the “lunatic core” of “radical legal egalitarianism.” Bansal is a lunatic and her appointment will ensure that Obama’s judicial appointments will be far more about “diversity” than they will be about competence.


    Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, Executive office of the President — Cecilia Munoz
    Munoz is a hard-core open borders advocate who served recently as the Vice President for the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), where she supervised all legislative activities. La Raza is the nation’s foremost supporter of “rights” for illegal aliens and the granting of amnesty to the millions of illegals here in America. She does not care that illegal aliens are costing America billions of dollars; she believes they should enjoy the same rights as citizens. Not surprisingly, she served on the U.S. Programs board of the
    Open Society Institute, a George Soros-funded group. You can expect Munoz to quietly push for a massive transfer of benefits and welfare to illegal aliens and for legislation granting amnesty to all those here illegally.

    Director, Domestic Policy Council – Melody Barnes
    Barnes is a certified wacko. She was previously Vice President of the far-left Center for American Progress and also served as Chief Counsel for Senator Ted Kennedy on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Her view on abortion is so extreme, she served on the boards of both Emily’s List and the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. She favors unrestricted abortions for any reason at any time of pregnancy.
    Incredibly, some naïve pro-life leaders supported Obama, believing he was pro-life because he supposedly wanted to find ways to reduce abortions. Barnes has put that myth to rest. In a meeting with key pro-family leaders, Barnes made it clear that “It is not our goal to reduce the number of abortions.” As reported, the room went silent.
    Barnes glorifies abortion as being a “concept of liberty that includes women as equal.” She has written that “reproductive rights are human rights.” My guess is that the baby being aborted doesn’t quite feel the same way. Needless to say, there will NOT be any pro-life measures supported by this administration. The Nation magazine praised Barnes as a “dyed-in-the-wool progressive,” a nice term for a socialist. She is also a former staff member for the American Constitutional Society, the far-left legal group mentioned elsewhere.


    these are the people obozo has given CZAR status too

    they answer to no-one but obozo

    as one commentator stated

    this is the best collection of people ever gathered to tear the constitution apart

    Stalin would be killing himself for not having these people


    Bo Langdon

    former head of the Communist Party of Great Britain Dec 2012


    as correctly guessed by a dedicated commo himmself ..

    the plan of these people is to strip the US of its constitution and replace it with the UN and welfare for all

    for the short time you can afford it .. once broke you'll fall into the global economy as just a account

    and be fed back through what they deem your worth ..

    Победа социализма в глобальной !!!!
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2012
  17. Thorisin

    Thorisin New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    124
    Location:
    Southern California
    Heller provided that gun owership in this country is an individual right.

    The senators already defeated a teraty pertaining to gun control.

    It would never float in this country.

    Even after Aurora the opinions of gun control didnt change. I live in one of the most restrictive states in the union as far as gun control and I can still get a gun when I need.
  18. Thorisin

    Thorisin New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    124
    Location:
    Southern California
    I do agree with your analysis of Obomas czars though.

    Way too many gun grabbers in the bunch
  19. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,600
    Location:
    Australia
    they only just beginning, after heller who do you have ??
  20. Thorisin

    Thorisin New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Messages:
    124
    Location:
    Southern California
    Heller is the law of the land now.

    But we also have a whole slew of congressmen who are pro guns. Its why there hasnt been any serious talk about added gun control.

    Gun control was much more feasible 20 years ago where the majority wanted it. The needle has swung the other way now.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
General Discussion Australian granny shoots rapists Sep 6, 2012
General Discussion US workers to fill Australian skill shortage Apr 1, 2012
General Discussion Australian SF's in the Ghan (Helmet Cam Vid) May 9, 2011
General Discussion Australian drunk survives attempt to ride crocodile Jul 13, 2010
General Discussion Australian vegetables poisoned as police probe sabotage Jul 11, 2010

Share This Page