1. Get Gear'd Up! Enter to WIN $1000 in gear!

    Please Click Here for full details and to enter. You will need to be registered and logged in to view the details and to participate.

    Thanks and good luck to everyone

Colorado Boy Suspended for Nobama t-shirt

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by 45nut, Sep 23, 2008.

  1. 45nut

    45nut Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,470
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/pollP44Question

    5th Grader Suspended For Anti-Obama Shirt
    Last Edited: Tuesday, 23 Sep 2008, 7:51 AM MDT
    Created: Monday, 22 Sep 2008, 9:15 PM MDT
    Aurora fifth-grader suspended for home madetshirt reading "Obama is a terrorist's best friend." 9/22/08
    SideBar

    Related Items
    Videos
    Links
    Comment in Message Boards
    Poll

    An 11-year-old boy was reprimanded for wearing a homemade shirt reading "Obama is a terrorist's best friend" :D to school this week. Do you think it was appropriate for the school to punish the student.


    AURORA (MyFOXColorado.com) - An 11-year-old in Aurora says his first amendment rights are being trampled after he was suspended for wearing a homemade shirt that reads "Obama is a terrorist's best friend." :eek::D

    The fifth grader at Aurora Frontier K-8 School wore it on a day when students were asked to wear red, white and blue to show their patriotism.

    The boy's father Dann Dalton describes himself as a "proud conservative" who has taken part in some controversial anti-abortion protests. Dalton says the school made a major mistake by suspending his son for wearing the shirt.

    "It's the public school system," Dalton says. "Let's be honest, it's full of liberal loons."

    According the the boy's father, the school district told the student, Daxx Dalton, that he had the choice of changing his shirt, turning his shirt inside out or being suspended.

    Daxx chose suspension.

    "They're taking away my right of freedom of speech," he says. "If I have the right to wear this shirt I'm going to use it. And if the only way to use it is get suspended, then I'm going to get suspended."

    Daxx's dad agrees with him and is encouraging his son to stand his ground. "The facts are his rights were violated. Period."

    Aurora Public Schools would not talk about the case but said the district "Respects a student's right to free speech, such as the right to wear specific clothing," but administrators say they review any situation that interrupts the learning environment.

    Paperwork submitted by the school district says Daxx Dalton was not suspended for wearing the shirt, but for willful disobedience and defiance.

    The boy's father says he intends to pursue a lawsuit against the district.
  2. artabr

    artabr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,859
    Location:
    New Iberia, Louisiana
    I hope they win.


    Art
  3. mrkirker

    mrkirker New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    3,067
    I masqueraded as a teacher for a while, so, I'd like to express my .02$, if I may, though it might ruffle a feather or two.

    I feel that a school system has to have the authority to monitor each situation in light of what ramifications might occur from the wearing of provocative clothing. In this instance, the statement on the shirt is plainly inflammatory, and could invite strong comments or actions that would interfere with an educational environment.

    While the first amendment must be respected, the overall enviornment of the facility must be protected. Wearing this shirt during a tightly contested, emotionaly charged election is akin to shouting "Fire" in a crowded theater. Does one have the 'right' to express an opinion? Of course. However, one must have the common sense as to 'when' to express a dissenting opinion. When common sense fails, a commonly recognized greater authority must step in for the common good of those who must share the situation. Free speech, even in the issuance of dissent, must be exercised wisely.

    As stated above, my opinion might have ruffled a feather or two.
    "Snipers to the fore!" :D
  4. artabr

    artabr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,859
    Location:
    New Iberia, Louisiana
    You can bet that if the shirt said anything that was a factual put down of McCain not a peep would have been heard. :mad:


    Art
  5. mrkirker

    mrkirker New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    3,067
    You can bet that if the shirt said anything that was a factual put down of McCain not a peep would have been heard.

    Now arta, we don't know that, do we? The school may have a policy of banning any type of political statement. Ours did.
  6. artabr

    artabr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,859
    Location:
    New Iberia, Louisiana
    I'd be willing to place a bet on it. :D



    Art
  7. 45nut

    45nut Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,470
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Well mrkirker we will never know will we? The public school system just gave McCain another ad if they choose to make use of this. :D

    While I understand the limitations to the First Amendment, I can't equate this to shouting "fire" in a movie theater. Was it just a bit outside the bounds to wear to a liberal government funded public school? I would say yes. Would you think that you would end up in the principles office if you choose to wear this to school? Yes, I think you would.

    On the other hand, if people can burn the American Flag, why can't a 5th grader wear a t-shirt (that fit the parameters of the schools instructions - red, white and blue) that expresses what he feels on a particular subject.

    Personally, I think his t-shirt is true. I wonder what would have happened if it had been a vanilla pro McCain t-shirt? :eek: :D

    Peace to all, the messiah is on the way (DOWN) :D
  8. mrkirker

    mrkirker New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    3,067
    If, as you stated, one is aware that one's attire will land them in trouble, why in the world would one wear that attire? :confused:

    a) To make a statement? Yes, :rolleyes: here's a fifth-grader, unable to vote (I assume), who has figured out the intricacies of a particular candidate's political makeup, (intricacies that as of yet, have been seldom defined other than to state "Change-change-change!"), and who wishes to make a political statement regarding that candidate's beliefs. Yes, that is SO believable!

    b) Because Daddy needs a mouthpiece? Hmmmm. ;)

    Okay, I too am as guilty as you in making rash assumptions regarding the background of the news item! :D:D:D:)
  9. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,956
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    It's more than obvious, from the father's comments, that he was seeking a lawsuit opportunity. What a dolt. And he's prostituting his son to do it. Shame on him!
  10. satellite66

    satellite66 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,066
    Location:
    Central NJ
    Uniforms would solve this stuff. Take the fashion show and agenda show out of it.
  11. Marlin T

    Marlin T Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,897
    Location:
    New Mexico
    If that was true it would have said so on the paper work. Not some liberal egotistical excuse like they gave.

    Are you one of the typical union liberals? Sounds like it to me :(
  12. satellite66

    satellite66 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,066
    Location:
    Central NJ
  13. Marlin T

    Marlin T Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,897
    Location:
    New Mexico
    I guessed that it was a flag before the site was loaded up.

    Please read my Sig below, this applies to most of the teachers in the US as proven once again by your link Sat66


    EDIT: Kirker, are you going to stand for the school in this case too? Wouldn't suprise me if you did.
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2008
  14. artabr

    artabr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,859
    Location:
    New Iberia, Louisiana
    66's story doesn't surprise me at all. :( :mad:


    Art
  15. mrkirker

    mrkirker New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    3,067
    Marlin T,
    Are you one of the typical union liberals? Sounds like it to me Nope, had to belong to a union once, left it because I HATED having someone tell me how to think, act, and vote. (Our name for our union rep was Scott Free)


    Please read my Sig below, this applies to most of the teachers in the US as proven once again by your link Sat66 So, you've gone 'on record' as being anti-teacher now. What happend, did a teacher scrare you when you were a child? :D That you provided an escape clause word (most) really does not change your intent in penning your comment now, does it?

    Marlin, Marlin, Marlin; Lumping ALL of any group and labeling the mass by the (your) definition that might apply to a few of said group is simply weak, an argument by generalization. Much like lumping ALL those of us who 'carry', value the 2nd, and obey the law, with the FEW miscreants who misuse firearms and appear in various news blurbs on a daily basis. It would seem that you hate it when the media uses that technique on 'us', yet you are guilty of the same short-sighted, mean-spirited, small-man attitude where a 'them' is concerned. :eek:

    . . . in the US as proven once again . . The only thing 'proven' in this instance is "who you are and what you believe" as conveyed by your comments. :rolleyes:

    EDIT: Kirker, are you going to stand for the school in this case too? Wouldn't suprise me if you did. Glad you aren't "suprised", but before puffing up too big, jump off you hind legs and check your spelling of the word "suprised". Ironic, eh? Perhaps you were mumbling under your breath about the unfairness of life when that mean ole nasty TEACHER was going over the spelling list that day! ;):D

    I, and my ex-wife were teachers. After several years of budget cuts, poor support from our school administrators in the matter of classroom discipline, and actually having instances where our physical safety was jeopardized in the CLASSROOM, we decided to seek other areas of employment. (We wern't alone.) That I earn substantially more as a janitor than I did as a teacher says volumes about the condition of our educational system in this country, and the attitude toward those who seek to provide the tools for our young people to succeed in today’s world, an attitude that you seem to reflect through your typed comments. :(

    Please understand that we didn't want to get rich. We wanted to earn enough to start a family, buy a home (with a dog or two), take a couple of weeks off in the summer to hike and camp. Most of all, we wanted to try to return something that the both of us had been given while attending school in a rural, poverty-stricken, pocket of Appalachia. Something that TEACHERS gave us: Hope.

    I am way off thread, and I apologize to our members for the 'rant' portion. I'm relatively new here, and I'm quilty of speaking like one of the Forum Fathers. :eek: Seriously, I hope that the young man can learn that there are situations in which one must diminish his expectations regarding the 1st; and that his dad can learn that there are instances in when the child is best served by NOT supporting each and every action that his child may have taken.
    Good day! :)
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Colorado is SOL Jun 27, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum why did the new Colorado gun laws fail to stop the latest madman? Dec 14, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Judge rules Colorado sheriffs can't sue over state gun laws Nov 28, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Colorado Recall Election Thread Sep 10, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Colorado says "Not So Fast" May 28, 2013

Share This Page