COURT RULES VICTIM CAN SUE GUN MAKER...

Discussion in 'VMBB Fire For Effect' started by rooter, Oct 9, 2012.

  1. rooter

    rooter *VMBB Senior Chief Of Staff*

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2001
    Messages:
    10,672
    Location:
    Marty Robbins old hometown, Glendale Arizona--a su
    BUFFALO, N.Y. -- A former high school athlete who was shot in 2003 may sue the companies that made and distributed the handgun used in the crime under an appellate court ruling that gun control advocates say will keep irresponsible gun makers and sellers from taking advantage of a federal law shielding them from lawsuits.

    The ruling by the Appellate Division of the state Supreme Court reversed a lower court's 2011 dismissal of victim Daniel Williams' complaint, which accused Ohio gun maker Hi-Point and distributor MKS Supply Inc. of Ohio of intentionally supplying handguns to irresponsible dealers because they profited from sales to the criminal gun market.

    The appellate panel said the Buffalo man's lawsuit should have been allowed to move forward because Williams' claims fall within exceptions contained in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, a 2005 federal law shielding gun makers from lawsuits over criminal use of their products.

    It is the first case in which a court has held that a gun manufacturer may be held liable under the PLCAA, according to the Washington-based Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which brought the appeal.

    "If a gun company knows or has reason to know that a dealer or distributor that is selling the guns is doing so irresponsibly and in some cases, illegally, they need to do something about it," Brady Center attorney Jonathan Lowy said Monday. "They can't just continue to blindly supply them, knowing they're going to be arming criminals and just pocket the money and look the other way."

    Williams was 16 when he was shot by a gang member in a case of mistaken identity as he played basketball outside his home. The bullet to his stomach ended his hopes of a Division I college basketball career.

    Attorneys for Williams argued the gun had ended up on the streets of Buffalo and in the hands of convicted shooter Cornell Caldwell through gun trafficker James Bostic, who'd bought some 200 guns from a federal licensed firearms dealer in Ohio by using a straw purchaser who would sign the paperwork.

    Williams' attorneys claimed the Ohio dealer, Charles Brown, knew or should have known that Bostic was buying the handguns to resell on the streets because he paid cash, chose Hi-Point 9 mm guns favored by criminals and bought them in bulk. Hi-Point and MKS should have known that Brown, who has since become president of MKS, was distributing the guns they supplied to him to criminals, Williams said.

    Hi-Point attorney Scott Allan disagreed with the appellate court ruling, issued Friday, saying Supreme Court Justice Frederick Marshall had gotten it right last year when he dismissed the suit under the PLCAA. The law was intended to allow for dismissal of such cases early on, he said.

    The case now moves to the discovery phase, where witnesses are interviewed.

    "We're confident that discovery will show that there were not violations of any statute by (Hi-Point) in its sale of the pistol to MKS," Allan said. He said Hi-Point, whose corporate name is Beemiller Inc., has and will continue to sell handguns only to federal licensees and that MKS is a licensed whole distributor.

    Attorneys for MKS and Brown did not immediately return calls for comment Monday.


    Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/artic...-sue-gun-maker-court-rules.html#ixzz28nPByplD
  2. howlnmad

    howlnmad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,576
    Location:
    Harriman, Tn
    That is such a load of crap. If anyone other than the shooter is sued, it should be MKS and the BATF&E.
  3. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,955
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Yeah, looks like that NICS system is workin like a charm, huh?
  4. flintlock

    flintlock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,097
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    A 200 gun straw purchase? Someone should check for Holder's fingerprints.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
VMBB Fire For Effect COURT JUDGES OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY... Jul 14, 2012
VMBB Fire For Effect RULES OF ENGAGEMENT???? Dec 16, 2013
VMBB Fire For Effect PERHAPS FAULTY 'RULES OF ENGAGEMENT'? Sep 17, 2012
VMBB Fire For Effect SEPARATE, BUT EQUAL...NEW RULES?? Aug 13, 2012
VMBB Fire For Effect BEST TO RE-THINK THOSE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT!!!! May 3, 2012

Share This Page