Domestic Terrorism Against President

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by Marlin, Nov 11, 2003.

  1. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,850
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    Here is a very poignant article by Oliver North in today's Washington Times specifically on the subject of supporting the Constitution. It is a MUST READ!

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    The Washington Times

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Political terrorism


    By Oliver North
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    Published November 9, 2003


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Veteran's Day — the national holiday we celebrate this week — used to be called Armistice Day. Until 1954, when President Dwight Eisenhower signed into law a bill proclaiming November 11 a day to honor veterans, Americans recognized the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month as the moment when the guns stopped firing in "The War to End All Wars."

    The 1918 agreement to end the carnage of World War I was anything but an unconditional victory for the Allies over the Central Powers — and it eventually led to a far less than perfect treaty and the creation of the fatally flawed League of Nations. But the November 11 Armistice to end the bloodletting is regarded by most historians as the only workable solution to conclude the killing that had already taken 9 million lives. If events this week in Washington are any indication, it may be time for a less-than-perfect political Armistice Day.

    On the eve of this year's Armistice-Veteran's Day holiday, it became crystal clear that Democrats in the United States Senate have declared war against the president of the United States. A memorandum, apparently written by a Democrat staff member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence was obtained by my Fox News colleague, Sean Hannity. The document details a political plan to use the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence to run a war room operation against President George W. Bush and his administration. The apparent goal: to unseat the president by using the committee as a tool to divide the commander in chief from the troops he leads. "We have carefully reviewed our options," and "the best approach," the memo states, is to urge investigations of the "Office of the Secretary of Defense as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department."

    Back in June, the committee decided to evaluate documented intelligence regarding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. Its review was supposed to examine shortcomings in the U.S. intelligence community — something both Democrats and Republicans agree are plentiful — and to formulate, in a responsible and bipartisan way, recommendations for improvement. Assuming this effort might lead to much-needed enhancements in our ability to collect human intelligence in the midst of a war that has already claimed more than 3,000 American lives, such a review makes sense.

    Nearly all responsible politicians agree that our intelligence community desperately needs better ways of penetrating radical Islamist terror cells. Even those running for office acknowledge we are in a war in which young Americans are dying — a war in which the lack of good intelligence is our greatest liability.

    Therefore, it seems the primary responsibility of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence should be to discern what needs "fixing" within our intelligence community and determine with urgency what resources are needed for those improvements. After all, the lives of young Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq — as well as the safety of U.S. citizens at home hang in the balance.

    But this memorandum reveals that these goals are not even being considered by eight of the 17 members of the Senate's Intelligence Committee.

    The Democrats who sit on one of the most sensitive and important bodies in our government have apparently decided that gathering, assessing and analyzing intelligence is less important than booting this president from office. "Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq," the memo states. In short, they have abandoned their responsibilities to our soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and countrymen and decided instead, to wage war against the president.

    Those who care about winning the real war in which we are now engaged should be outraged at this crass politicization of a committee so closely tied to our national security. One might have expected that the discovery of this memorandum would generate an outcry from members of the so-called mainstream media. Yet, many glossed over the document, as though its existence is simply "more of the same" from Washington. Others apparently dismissed it because it was discovered by a "talk radio host." Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the committee's ranking Democrat, denigrated the memo because it was "prepared by a staffer."

    All this denies the reality of the words in the memorandum. The "we" used in the document proves more than one person was involved in crafting the attack. It is also evident the strategy for "pulling the trigger" on an investigation "early next year" aimed at bringing down the president was amply discussed for some time. It is also apparent that no matter what the ongoing review of Iraq war intelligence produces, those who crafted the document have already decided on the need to "assiduously prepare Democratic 'additional views' to, among other things, castigate the majority [Republicans] for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry."

    Curiously, no investigative reporter has taken note of the sentence referring to the "FBI Niger investigation [which] was done solely at the request of the vice chairman." Until now, we have been led to believe the CIA asked the FBI to investigate who "leaked" the name of one of their clandestine service officers. The authors of the memo seem to know better.

    What else they know about political terrorism in the corridors of power should be the matter of a new FBI investigation. After all, as Georgia Democrat Sen. Zell Miller said of the contents of this memo, "If this is not treasonous, it's the first cousin of treason."

    © 2003 New World Communications, Inc.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Holder - Domestic drone strikes legal Mar 5, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Special Forces Take On Domestic Enemies Promoting Gun Control In Letter Jan 30, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Arizona signs on to domestic firearms law Apr 8, 2010
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Domestic Terrorists Sep 4, 2009
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Foreign interests manipulating our domestic policy? Mar 3, 2009

Share This Page