fed heads

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by sewerman, Mar 12, 2010.

  1. sewerman

    sewerman New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    231
    Location:
    hurricane ally florida
    maybe some of the czars in washington need to read about state rights before pushing to over turn the new state laws governing firearms:

    4. Particular to the United States, the U.S. Constitution was voluntarily formed as a compact by existing sovereign states with existing state constitutions. See FP 39. Despite the deceptive proposition that the States were created by Congress, the States existed prior to and independent of any Congress, as confirmed by the Treaty of Paris in 1783 (which, by the way, was not overturned by any subsequent legal action of the states). “The State governments, by their original constitutions, are invested with complete sovereignty.” Alexander Hamilton, FP 31. And, “Each State, in ratifying the constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act.” James Madison, FP 39.

    Today, there is a fraudulent notion in America which places the U.S. Constitution above the importance and relevance of the state constitutions and state sovereignty, despite the fact that we were told (in efforts to get us to ratify the U.S. Constitution) that “the State governments would clearly retain all rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, exclusively delegated to the United States.” Alexander Hamilton, FP 32. The authoritative advocates of the U.S. Constitution confirm that even with the U.S. Constitution ratified or with the U.S. Constitution dissolved, the states would have their own constitutions to protect freedom and secure the blessings of liberty within that state.

    It was even proposed during the 1780s that instead of one confederacy being created through the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, several confederacies be ratified instead. See FP 2. So, it cannot be accurately stated that the U.S. Constitution was the sole form of convenience of the states. The U.S. Constitution was in fact an “experiment” of union, which admittedly may not work. James Madison, FP 14. Many notable American patriots, of course, (prophetically and correctly) believed the U.S. Constitution would in time, by constitutional construction, become destructive to the natural rights and sovereignty of the people of the states. Even pro-U.S. Constitution advocates warned us of the tyrannical tendency of central governments and implored the State governments to “afford complete security against invasions of the public liberty by the national authority.” Alexander Hamilton, FP 28.

    Therefore, it must be acknowledged that the U.S. Constitution no more creates freedom than any other government creates freedom; and that the U.S. Constitution was simply a union of states for very limited purposes, all of which were and can be handled by the states themselves without the existence of the U.S. Constitution or federal governmen.

    there's smoke on the horizen?,... either someone's a cookin or
    them folks got their Ire up!

    sewerman
  2. dge479

    dge479 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    618
    Location:
    Haskell NJ
    All the czars need to go. There is no need for them to be there at all.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Heads up Mississippi Jan 15, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Heads Up Nevada: Semi-Automatic Rifle Classification: 8/28 Aug 27, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Heads up Texans! Sep 28, 2011
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Heads Up new Yorkers May 8, 2010
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum A Heads Up for 3/10/09 Mar 9, 2009

Share This Page