Five Reasons So Many Grassroots Conservatives Don't Like Mitt Romney

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by RunningOnMT, Feb 1, 2012.

  1. RunningOnMT

    RunningOnMT New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,720
    Location:
    Akron, Ohio
    Five Reasons So Many Grassroots Conservatives Don't Like Mitt Romney

    John Hawkins

    John Hawkins is a professional blogger who runs Right Wing News
    Jan 31, 2012

    It's a mystery to some people why so many Tea Partiers and grassroots conservatives can’t stand Mitt Romney. What is it about him that turns them off so much that at one time or another, they've preferred Donald Trump, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich to him nationally despite the fact that he has every advantage in the race? Would Mitt Romney be better than Barack Obama? Sure, but there are some very good reasons that so many grassroots conservatives still find him to be a thoroughly unlikable candidate.

    1) He's not a conservative. There have been a lot of conservatives who've talked a good game during the primaries and then have let us down in D.C., but if Mitt Romney becomes the nominee and gets elected, some people seem to be hoping that he'll be the first Republican moderate to go to D.C. and turn into a fire-breathing conservative. Based on his record, if Mitt Romney is nominated, he will be the least conservative candidate since Nixon.

    Moreover, keep in mind that in 1994, when Mitt Romney was 47 years old, he was telling people that, "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush" and the Contract with America was "not a good idea." Eight years later in 2002, when he was 55 years old, Mitt Romney was saying, "I think people recognize that I'm not a partisan Republican, that I'm someone who is moderate, and that my views are progressive.” Oh, joy! So he was a progressive, like Hillary Clinton! After four years of governing as a barely right of center moderate and coming up with Romneycare, a piece of signature legislation that any liberal Democrat would be proud of, Mitt Romney supposedly became a conservative -- precisely at the same moment he started running for President. What a stunning coincidence!

    One of the great ironies of the campaign is that Newt Gingrich has been quite properly dinged for being a good Republican soldier and endorsing Dede Scozzafava over the Conservative Party's Doug Hoffman and now, a lot of the "good Republican soldiers" are endorsing a male version of Scozzafava for President over Newt.

    2) He doesn't believe in anything politically other than Mitt Romney. What conservative cause has Mitt Romney ever fought like hell for in his career? There are none. What has Mitt Romney ever done for conservatives in his career? Nothing of significance...oh wait, I forgot; when he was asked about it in the Florida debate, he noted that he started a family and a business, which is nice, but probably puts him on par with about half of the people reading this column.

    In the last decade alone, Mitt has been against an amendment to stop gay marriage and for an amendment to stop gay marriage, for cap and trade and against cap and trade, against Bush's tax cuts and for Bush's tax cuts, for abortion and against abortion, for gun control and against gun control....it goes on and on. Like Arlen Specter, Romney would feel just as comfortable running as a Democrat or Republican and like Barack Obama, all of Mitt's promises come with an expiration date. It's almost impossible to know where Romney will be on any issue in six months, including Obamacare, much less where he'd be after he got elected and settled down inside the Beltway. How do you get fired up about a guy like that? How do you believe in him the way conservatives believe in guys like Jim DeMint?

    Mitt Romney is a repeat of the same show conservatives have seen over and over again and we all know the ending if the candidate gets elected. These plastic men, these political Stretch Armstrongs get inside the Beltway Bubble, the media starts working on them, the establishment starts whispering in their ear and next thing you know, they're explaining how important comprehensive immigration reform is to the conservative cause or why we need another Bridge to Nowhere.

    When you're a grassroots conservative who has been mocked, ridiculed and attacked for believing in conservatism, capitalism, and the Constitution, sold out again and again by people in your own party, and told your nation is on the verge of a debt-driven crisis that could bankrupt us, the last thing you want is to be treated like you're stupid by a phony Massachusetts moderate who tells you he believes the same things you do when you damn well know he doesn't mean a word of it.

    3) Mitt Romney has benefitted from a tremendous media double standard. Other than Herman Cain, who at least is a conservative who has worked tirelessly for the Tea Party, Mitt Romney is the single least qualified man running for office in the Republican field. Yes, Mitt's business experience is a plus, but it didn't help him in Massachusetts, where he was an awful, unpopular governor whose signature program, Romneycare, has been a miserable failure. Romney has gotten where he is because he's rich, the establishment is behind him, and much of the conservative media has been greasing the skids for him.

    The double standards have been extraordinary and grating. The other candidates had to bring up Bain Capital because much of the conservative media wouldn't touch the very issue that Ted Kennedy used to beat Mitt Romney's brains in back in 1994. Even today, when you try to point out that Mitt's "100,000" jobs created number is pure vapor, that he made a lot of money off of deals where the taxpayers and the FDIC had to pick up the tab, or that it looks awful for Mitt to make millions on deals where businesses went under and hundreds of middle class workers lost their jobs, you're answered with cries of "capitalism" and "free enterprise!" Good luck with that strategy in the general election if, God help us all, Mitt gets that far.

    Furthermore, remember when Newt Gingrich was ahead of Mitt in Iowa, running a positive campaign, and was told "Politics ain't beanbag" after Mitt creamed him with millions in negative ads? Then remember when those same people squealed with outrage when Mitt got exactly what he had been dishing out after New Hampshire? We were told Newt was campaigning like a liberal when he hit Mitt on Bain Capital, but when Mitt ran dishonest ads featuring Tom Brokaw crowing about a now discredited ethics investigation, the same people were silent. After the last debate, it was amazing to hear talking heads telling everyone how wonderful Mitt did after Rick Santorum gutted him like a Christmas turkey on Obamacare and Romney was booed by the audience after he was caught lying about not having seen an ad that he personally endorsed.

    Let's be honest and name some names: Jen Rubin, Charles Krauthammer, George Will, National Review, Fox News and the Drudge Report among others have been shilling for Mitt Romney and attacking his adversaries during this primary the way the New York Times will for Barack Obama in the general election. That doesn't make them RINOS, liberals, part of the establishment or bad people. Reasonable people can reach different conclusions about which candidate to support. But that being said, these people should realize that as far as a lot of other conservatives are concerned, they are betting their reputations on Mitt Romney. What they are in effect saying in so many words is, "Vote for Mitt Romney and we promise you that not only will he get elected, he'll govern conservatively." Given his record, that's liquidating your house and putting it on a spin of the roulette wheel.

    4) Mitt Romney is cozying up to the establishment, not the Tea Party. Never have so many self-interested, politically-gutless establishment space fillers gathered in one place as on the endorsement list for Mitt Romney. If Bob Dole, John McCain, Susan Molinari, Lisa Murkowski, Jim Talent, Joe Scarborough, Mel Martinez, Jim Gerlach, Judd Gregg, Jon Huntsman, John Sununu and Norm Coleman are all lining up behind a candidate in a contested GOP primary, it's an almost ironclad guarantee that candidate is not going to be worth a bucket of warm spit once he gets into office. If you want to know why you're seeing so many Tea Partiers lining up behind Newt Gingrich, who despite his flaws has done more for the conservative cause than any other living politician, it's because they see the politicians backing Mitt Romney and they're well aware that they're not friends of grassroots conservatives.

    It's absolutely unbelievable that after the grassroots helped the GOP have its best year in half a century that we may end up with a human "SCREW YOU!" to the Tea Party like Mitt Romney as the nominee. Here we have a moderate establishment-endorsed candidate who supported TARP, is open to more bailouts, came up with the mother of Obamacare, and he has no bold plans to tackle the deficit -- and this is the guy Tea Partiers are supposed to support after fighting to beat Republicans like that in primaries during the 2010 election cycle? Why don't we just drag Robert Bennett out of retirement to run at the top of the ticket?

    5) Mitt just isn't likable enough to be a good politician. Mitt Romney comes across like a sort of bizarro-world combination between John Kerry, Richie Rich, Charlie Crist, and Data from Star Trek. This is what makes the first part of this Saturday Night Live skit so funny -- Mitt really does come across as that weirdly out of touch with hu-man emotion sometimes.

    He's also an extremely nasty campaigner -- a little like Barney Frank, without the modicum of vicious charm that endears him to liberals. Want to know why this campaign has been so divisive? That's easy: Mitt Romney embraced win-at-all-costs character assassination and negative advertising as the primary tactic of his campaign and the other candidates had to respond to it. Since he's proven too unlikable to be pulled up very much, Mitt's strategy has been to pull the other candidates down, even if it leads to a mud fight that lessens anyone's chances of winning in a general election.

    Additionally, as Mike Huckabee has noted, "[Romney] looks like the guy who fires you, not the guy who hires you" -- and by the way, he does. This, along with the incredibly effective Bain ads that helped sink Mitt in South Carolina are why he's had to release pictures of himself awkwardly doing laundry -- because his campaign believes it allows normal human beings to be able to relate to him better. Is that a good sign? That our "super electable" GOP candidate feels compelled to release pictures of himself standing in front of a washing machine to reassure people that he's more like them? Of course, it won't work because Mitt Romney may be the first politician I've ever seen who has the ability to NEVER appear to be completely sincere about anything. Combine that with his campaign's smug "Megan McCainesque" sense of entitlement and Mitt Romney would be going into the 2012 campaign with a likability deficit even compared to Barack Obama, who has nauseated the entire country with his radicalism, incompetence, and Barney the Dinosaur style sloganeering. What it all comes down to is that when people see a pampered, prissy, fake, spiteful son of a governor who's being served the GOP nomination on a silver platter because he kissed the right establishment behinds, benefitted from an enormous media double standard, and has more money than everyone else, well, let's just say that's exactly the sort of person who inspired someone to come up with the word schadenfreude.
  2. rosierita

    rosierita New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,218
    Location:
    South Carolina
    do you have a link for this?

    i CANNOT STAND mitt romney. if he ends up being the nominee, i hope that someone truly conservative decides to run as an independent.

    mittens may be better than obama by a hair, but that's not good enough. i'm not sure i can stomach voting for him for that reason. :barf:
  3. RunningOnMT

    RunningOnMT New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,720
    Location:
    Akron, Ohio
    Yes Rosierita :). Sorry I forgot to put that in there.

    http://cowboybyte.com/3781/five-reasons-so-many-grassroots-conservatives-dont-like-mitt-romney/

    And I agree with you. As we've all said before "anybody but Obama", but in my opinion we are really scraping the bottom of the Barrel with Mitt. I don't like Newt too much either, but I do think he's a bit more conservative than Romney.

    I will vote for either Ron Paul or Rick Santorum in the primary; that is if either is still in the race, but I'll hold my nose and vote for whomever the nominee is in the general election.
  4. flintlock

    flintlock Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,061
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    As much as I don't care for Mitt Romney, I will vote for him if he is the alternative to Obama. I don't think that a third party run will do much besides putting the current occupant back in the White House. And this doesn't mean I think that there is no one qualified to make a third party run, I'm just no feeling that it will be effective this election.

    I'm also wondering how the Tea Party is coming out in favor of Newt. The man is the ultimate political insider. Politics are never dull arfe they?
  5. Airdale

    Airdale Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Messages:
    886
    Location:
    N.W. Arkansas
    :yeahthat:
  6. The Duke

    The Duke New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    812
    Location:
    NW Louisiana
    :yeahthat:
    Once again, the political insiders have "fixed' it just like they want...We have no choice as the alternative to not voting for the 'lesser of two evils' would be too disasterous...The puppet masters are the election game professionals and know precicesly how to stack the deck behind the scenes and out of sight.....If it were almost anyone other than the Oboze sitting on his white house throne, Id vote for anyone the Tea Party or conservative qualified to run...Mitt Romney would make it very easy for me to go Third Party...In essence, doing that for this election I would be helping re-elect the worst president in history...I have NO clear choice...

    Look at Regan...He won election with two of the largest landslide victories ever as an outright conservative... That scared the the wits out of the power boys....Americans have voted and gave a clear mandate that is totally against the bone of the New World Order bunch.....So they 'fixed' it where it wont happen again..Tea Party was a bump in the road for them, but they will neuter them as a third party by making the concequences just too damning for most people to risk their vote...

    I believe they have done it expertly by polarizing America...The Demicans have the liberals, Unions, Blacks, Welfare/Entitlement crowd in their block pocket...So Republicrats going to get the conservative vote by default, no matter how LIBERAL and RINO their annointed one is......They know that voting for the Kool-smoking Barry Hussain is simply not going to happen..So its win-win for them and lose-lose for America...

    No matter which one wins the election, the outcome will be the same for the boys in the back room who do the ruling.....More big government, more waste, more deficit spending, collapse the economy and the dollar, more gun laws, more entitlements, more taxes, more power for them, until America ceases to be a free country that 'elects' their leaders..This is sickning BS!!!!!...The stench is overpowering and I suppose I will have to hold my nose yet again on election day..Romney is right in there with the rest of them...But who else is there?

    I read somewhere that the world can be divided into only two classes of people...1) The Rulers 2) Those who are Ruled.

    At one time government feared the voter and was ruled by the people and their voting power..Now its the other way around.:mad:
  7. graehaven

    graehaven Active Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,946
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    If Mitt wins, we are screwed. In Newt wins, we are screwed. If Santorum wins, we are semi-screwed.

    There is only ONE conservative, constitutional, balanced individual left. That is who I'm voting for. IF all the gun owners would too, we'd avoid the country going in the toilet.
  8. RunningOnMT

    RunningOnMT New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,720
    Location:
    Akron, Ohio
    +1
  9. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,854
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    The GOP by following the "Establishment" line is signing it's own death warrant. Romney is no better than most Democrats, a TRUE RINO. It would be nice to get rid of what we now have but Romney represents no REAL choice. :(

    The proof in the pudding can be seen by looking at the Massachusetts he left behind.....
  10. rosierita

    rosierita New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,218
    Location:
    South Carolina
    i ended up voting to newt in our primary. i cannot get behind ron paul's foreign policy, its too scary to me.

    at least w/ newt, he has a mostly conservative record & the things i disagreed w/ like his global warming hoax support, he's since denounced.

    newt supports the 2nd amendment & has a very high anti-abortion record. those are my 2 main "sticking points".

    some of newt's problem is the establishment & their revisionist rewriting of history.

    thanks for the link ROMT, i'm going to share it w/ some friends at another board.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Five reasons why I believe Rick Perry wil be President in 2013 Aug 15, 2011
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Five More Words Added To The 2nd Amendment ...... Apr 13, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr NYPD cracks down on long guns that hold more than five rounds Dec 5, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Five Hard Realities for Gun-Control Proponents Apr 8, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Thirty Five Articles of Impeachment against Obama Oct 26, 2012