GOA ACTION NOTICE

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Marlin, Sep 12, 2007.

  1. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,854
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    Veterans Disarmament Bill Could Come Before The Senate At Any Time
    -- GOA provides Senators with several pro-gun amendments

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org


    "Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of
    Boston!" -- Patrick Henry, in his "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death"
    speech of March 23, 1775

    Wednesday, September 12, 2007


    The Senate could bring up the Veterans Disarmament Bill at any time,
    as a result of its passage in the Judiciary Committee a few weeks
    ago. The bill -- introduced by F-rated Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and
    Sen. Patrick Leahy -- is ready to come to the floor.

    Gun Owners of America delivered draft amendments to every Senate
    office yesterday, providing important changes that must be made to
    the bill. Among others, the most important amendment would make it
    clear that veterans suffering from PTSD are NOT prohibited persons,
    and thus, are not to be denied the ability to purchase a firearm
    simply because of emotional problems resulting from their service to
    this country.

    The Military Order of the Purple Heart is opposed to the
    McCarthy-Leahy bill, having stated on June 18 of this year, that "For
    the first time the legislation, if enacted, would statutorily impose
    a lifetime gun ban on battle-scarred veterans."

    Military veterans are justifiably concerned that this bill will
    legitimize the very thing that President Clinton did over seven years
    ago, when his administration added 83,000 names of veterans --
    suffering from maladies such as PTSD -- into the NICS background
    check system.

    Proponents of the bill argue that this bill gives veterans a
    mechanism for getting their names off of the prohibited person list.
    That's like giving a mugger access to your home, but then stating you
    can hire a lawyer and pay THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS of dollars to
    eventually (maybe) get your stolen items back.

    If the proponents are right -- that this bill will actually help gun
    owners -- then surely they won't object to friendly amendments that
    are designed to make it unmistakably clear that military veterans or
    grownups who suffered with ADHD as children will never be denied the
    ability to purchase a firearm, simply because they once had a
    "determination" from an anti-gun shrink that said there was the
    MINISCULE possibility that they could pose a danger to themselves or
    others.

    You can be sure that if the McCarthy-Leahy bill passes, it will just
    be a first step. Consider some of the bigoted statements made by
    celebrities and politicians which not only show their contempt for
    gun owners but their pompous thinking which leads them to believe
    that we are all crazy for wanting to own a gun:

    * "I don't know that he's mentally qualified to own that gun." --
    Democrat Presidential candidate Joe Biden, insulting a YouTube viewer
    during a debate after the man referred to his semi-auto as his "baby"
    (July 25, 2007).

    * "Isn't it possible that we all have that bit of insanity in us?
    That's why I'm for gun control.... I don't really believe that a
    human being who feels [things] should have the option [that is,
    access to a gun] at their fingertips." -- Actress Jodie Foster,
    quoted in a Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence press release
    (August 20, 2007).

    And then there're the studies which will be, no doubt, used by
    liberal anti-gunners to strip away the gun rights from more and more
    law-abiding citizens, using the pretext that a shrink's diagnosis
    proves these people shouldn't own guns:

    * "A quarter of the Afghanistan and Iraq war veterans treated with US
    government-funded health care have been diagnosed with a mental
    disorder, according to a study published Monday." -- AFP news (March
    12, 2007)

    * "The number of American children and adolescents treated for
    bipolar disorder increased 40-fold from 1994 to 2003, researchers
    report today in the most comprehensive study of the controversial
    diagnosis. Experts say the number has almost certainly risen further
    since 2003." -- New York Times (September 4, 2007)

    Even before the studies started rolling in, gun haters were already
    working the legal loopholes as best they could. When the Veterans
    Administration got caught adding veterans' names into the NICS system
    during the Clinton presidency, they defended their actions by saying
    it was "required by law" -- a statement which was just flat out
    false.

    But it's notable to hear what a spokesman for the VA said in an
    interview with WoldNetDaily (June 27, 2000). He said the most common
    way of finding a veteran "incompetent" is when he or she receives a
    formal rating of incompetency from a VA panel of medical
    representatives or from "a duly authorized VA medical center,
    government agency, or even a PRIVATE PHYSICIAN." (Emphasis added.)

    That's what HR 2640 is all about. McCarthy and Leahy (and others
    like Sen. Chuck Schumer) are forging the legal chains that will be
    used to keep hundreds of thousands -- if not millions -- of decent,
    law-abiding Americans from owning guns... not because of what a court
    rules, but because of what ONE INDIVIDUAL says.

    Over two hundred years ago, Patrick Henry warned about the "chains"
    that were being forged to enslave them. If he were here today, would
    he not warn us again?

    Thankfully, there are many of you who are sounding the alarm. State
    groups from all over the nation are pumping out alerts to supplement
    what GOA is doing at the national level. Just yesterday, the New
    Hampshire Firearms Coalition (NHFC) called its members to action,
    stating that HR 2640 is a Trojan Horse, which sounds justified on the
    outside with promises of keeping "mental defectives" from having
    firearms. But when one takes a closer look at the details of the
    bill, the group said, it reveals "a huge expansion in those who will
    become a prohibited person; an expansion that could potentially
    include most Americans."

    In addition to pointing out how many shrinks could prohibit average
    Americans from owning guns, NHFC points out that many pediatricians
    could make similar anti-gun "determinations" (using the language of
    the bill) to disarm their patients -- since after all, these docs
    believe that "any household with firearms is 'dangerous,' even if
    they are properly stored."

    Good point.

    ACTION:

    1. Stay informed. GOA has a mammoth section on our website which
    both gives the specifics of the Veterans Disarmament Act and answers
    the claims made by supporters of the bill. Please go to
    http://www.gunowners.org/netb.htm to get more information, including
    the proposed GOA amendments that were delivered to each Senator on
    Tuesday.

    2. Alert others. Forward this alert to pro-gun friends and family
    and ask them to take action as well.

    3. Take action. Please contact your Senators, even if you have
    already done so. You can use the pre-written message below and send
    it as an e-mail by visiting the GOA Legislative Action Center at
    http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm (where phone and fax numbers
    are also available).

    ----- Pre-written letter -----

    Dear Senator:

    I oppose the Veterans Disarmament Act, which is being pushed by Rep.
    Carolyn McCarthy (HR 2640) and Sen. Patrick Leahy. This bill will
    expand the 1993 Brady Law and disarm hundreds of thousands of combat
    veterans, among others.

    I understand that Gun Owners of America distributed several
    amendments yesterday to every senatorial office to address the
    mistaken arguments that supporters of the bill have. I also
    understand that proponents of this bill are claiming it will actually
    help gun owners.

    They argue that this bill gives veterans a mechanism for getting
    their names off of the prohibited person list. That's like giving a
    mugger access to your home, but then stating you can hire a lawyer
    and pay thousands upon thousands of dollars to eventually (maybe) get
    your stolen items back.

    Well, if the proponents are right -- that this bill will actually
    help gun owners -- then surely they won't object to friendly
    amendments that are designed to make it unmistakably clear that
    military veterans or grownups who suffered with ADHD as children will
    never be denied the ability to purchase a firearm, simply because
    they once had a "determination" from an anti-gun shrink that said
    there was the MINISCULE possibility that they could pose a danger to
    themselves or others. That is what the GOA amendments are designed
    to do.

    I still believe that the Brady Law has done more to register gun
    owners and deny guns from of law-abiding Americans than to keep guns
    out of criminals' hands. But adopting these amendments will at least
    prevent an anti-gun administration from doing what the Clintons did
    in 2000 when the Veterans Administration added the names of some
    83,000 veterans into the NICS system.

    Sincerely,


    ****************************
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
General Discussion GOA Notice - Immediate Action Needed May 19, 2009
General Discussion GOA Action Notice - Land Bill Vote Wednesday Mar 24, 2009
General Discussion GOA ACTION NOTICE - Needs UNANIMOUS Action Mar 16, 2009
General Discussion GOA ACTION Notice - MORE LOSS of GUN RIGHTS Feb 11, 2009
General Discussion Another GOA Action Notice Feb 10, 2009

Share This Page