Gun Control, Treaty Style

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by steve4102, Jan 6, 2010.

  1. Big ugly

    Big ugly New Member

    Feb 27, 2009
    Knoxville Tennessee
    Yeah well Obama already signed us up for the treaty here in the USSof A
     

  2. steve4102

    steve4102 Former Guest

    Jan 27, 2006
    Minnesota
    I know, And he claims that he does not need the US Senate to ratify it. Declares that it has already been ratified during the Bush Administration, he is only amending it to keep up with the times. According to him and his Socialist congress, amendments to an existing treaty are not subject to Senate ratification. No big deal anyway. The Socialist party with a 60 vote majority would ratify it anyway, in a heart beat.
     
  3. zkovach

    zkovach Well-Known Member

    Oct 7, 2009
    Michigan
    i believe if that happened it would be the straw that broke the camels back.
     
  4. He needs 67 votes in the Senate to pass a treaty. But even some Democrats wouldn't touch anything having to do with gun control with a 10 ft pole.

    I knew, I KNEW, Barry would eventually try to sign some POS UN treaty and then claim that he doesn't need the Senate to ratify it. I KNEW he would try it eventually:mad::mad::mad:
     
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Gun control? Really? Thursday at 5:32 AM
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Alan Watt: How Television & Sports Are Used to Control The Masses Oct 13, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Media and climate change-Taxation and control Aug 22, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr "Common Sense” Gun Control Lies Exposed Aug 18, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr People(Gun)Controls Newest Poster Boys Jun 15, 2016