Help me identify this?

Discussion in 'The Pre-Ban Forum' started by jzdziarski, May 28, 2003.

  1. jzdziarski

    jzdziarski New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    12
    The Lower is Essential Arms. I'm trying to identify the upper, or any other markings that suggest this gun was complete (or a complete kit) prior to the ban. The fact that the rear sight is gray suggests to me that it was also EA, meaning it was manufactured before they went out of business in 93.

    The cast markings also suggest the upper's quite old. Any comments welcome.

    http://www.networkdweebs.com/lower.jpg
    http://www.networkdweebs.com/lower2.jpg
    http://www.gunbroker.com/auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=9169605
  2. LIKTOSHOOT

    LIKTOSHOOT Advanced Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2001
    Messages:
    9,367
    all are Pre-Ban as they went out of business in 1993.
    (DPMS bought them prior to the Ban)
    lower receiver serial numbers begin with EA
    some or all lowers are cast
    light gray coloring
    rumored that Ruger investment casted the lowers for Essential Arms
  3. jzdziarski

    jzdziarski New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Messages:
    12
    Yes but EA didn't sell completed rifles, which is why i'm trying to identify the make and possible manufacture date of the upper. If the upper was also EA, then it was most likely sold as a kit and is pre-ban.
  4. LIKTOSHOOT

    LIKTOSHOOT Advanced Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2001
    Messages:
    9,367
    do not confuse EA/Eagle Arms/Armalite
    they are the ones that sold kits and lowers
    and there has been a problem concerning
    pre/post ban

    yours is preban, as were all

    Essential Arms that is
  5. CountryGunsmith

    CountryGunsmith New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,115
    Location:
    Deep Piney Woods of East Texas
    His concern is whether he can prove the rifle was assembled prior to the ban, and if the upper was built AFTER the ban that would not be possible.

    I'm going to agree with the theory that the upper is pre-94, and that the rifle is legitimate.

    Whether it is worth the $1300 or not, well, that's an individual decision (to me, no).
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Pre-Ban Forum NEW TO AR STYLE RIFLES AND I NEED SOME HELP! Jul 12, 2009
The Pre-Ban Forum MAK 90 Upgrade: Help with the rules Mar 25, 2009
The Pre-Ban Forum need help May 13, 2007
The Pre-Ban Forum please help me decide,I need imput''' Jan 7, 2007
The Pre-Ban Forum Thinking of an AR...Please Help Jul 16, 2006

Share This Page