Historical Accuracy of Brass Frame Revolvers

Discussion in 'Black Powder Shooting / Muzzleloaders / Handguns' started by acme66, Jan 10, 2008.

  1. acme66

    acme66 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5
    I am interested in the historical accuracy of using .44 brass frame Navy revolvers for CW reenactment. Some I have spoken too feel the 'iron' shortage that forced the introduction of brass components is overblown and the weapons would be sparse and undesirable in the field due to reliability issues. Others maintain that it would be hard to find anything but the brass frame. Do you have an opinion or could you offer advice as to where I can look to answer my questions? I apologize if this is a repeat, a search did not turn up the answers I seek.

    Many thanks in advance,

    Ken Nelson
  2. Oneida Steve

    Oneida Steve Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,085
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    I agree that the "iron shortage" is overblown. I think few (if any) Colt-style revolvers with brass frames were used in the Confederacy.

    When brass-framed reproductions first showed up in the 1960's it was due (IMO) to the penny-pinching cheapness of the manufacturers and not to any historical mandate.
  3. Little Rooster

    Little Rooster New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Messages:
    564
    Location:
    Old Dominion
    First I believe if you look Colt didn't make a .44 cal NAVY. It would have been .36. Seems the Italian gunmakers thought there was enough of us warthawgs who would like the bigger caliber. It's been 20 years since I have owned a brass frame, I believe most feel the frame streches because of the softer alloy. Have read reports of guys who have shot the brass frames extensively, without problems also.
  4. jjmitchell60

    jjmitchell60 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,542
    Location:
    Raised in Buzzard Roost near Frog Town in hillls o
    Brass frame revolvers were around during teh Civilo War du to one main reason, well 2 reasons. they were mainly in the CSA due to shortage of iron due to the Union Blockades and the fact the South was able to make brass frame revolvers easier than iron since most of the smelting facilities were in the industrialized North. Granted the South used a LOT of British revolvers as well as French LeMats but still bras frame revolvers were around, many made from melted down brass cannons of all things.

    As to shooting them, IF greased properly, they shoot rather well but will wear out after a few thousand rounds being brass is softer than Iron. There are some originl southern brass frame revolvers and single shot hand guns in museums, Perryville battle field in KY has one in their museum. It is made more like a Star rather than a Colt. Also there are refrences to many 31 caliber brass frame revolvers being issued to behind the lines authorities in the CSA.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
Black Powder Shooting / Muzzleloaders / Handguns When observations become historical fact Mar 26, 2011
Black Powder Shooting / Muzzleloaders / Handguns Are you having accuracy problems with your Omega Z5? try this Nov 26, 2013
Black Powder Shooting / Muzzleloaders / Handguns Problem with accuracy when using less than 150 grains Aug 5, 2012
Black Powder Shooting / Muzzleloaders / Handguns Remington Model 1858 accuracy testing. May 9, 2012
Black Powder Shooting / Muzzleloaders / Handguns 1861 Springfield accuracy question Jul 11, 2010

Share This Page