Is Carrying A Gun A Crime Even With A Carry License?

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by montezumaz, Sep 19, 2012.

  1. montezumaz

    montezumaz Former Guest

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2012
    Messages:
    652
    Location:
    Central AZ (Yavapai County)
    FL Supreme Court To Decide!
    http://www.ammoland.com/2012/09/18/...rime-even-with-a-carry-license/#axzz26y9Ck9py

    In 1987 Florida changed its law to create a statewide licensing system for concealed carry. This did away with the former law that based the licensing of concealed and unconcealed carry with County Commissions. This was the famous “Shall-Issue” law that made Florida the prototype for concealed carry laws nationwide. Today nearly 1-million people have current Concealed Carry Licenses under this law. The problem is that when the law was changed, the legislature didn’t use the general rule of statutory language construction that was used in the previous statute. This gave prosecutors another bite at the apple. The courts started to ignore the legislature’s intent and instead, just looked to the technical structure of the updated concealed carry statutes.
    Now the courts are saying that anytime you carry a firearm you are committing a crime. If you have a concealed carry license, that just gives you an “affirmative defense” to the charges. In order for the police to stop and frisk or arrest you, they must first observe facts supporting a reasonable suspicion that a suspect is engaged in criminal activity or have information suggesting the possession of a firearm is unlawful. Now, under the Mackey decision, any time you exercise your Second Amendment right you are engaged in presumably criminal activity. Therefore, you can be stopped, searched, and even arrested for carrying a firearm and then be made to present the “affirmative defense” to a judge that you have a valid concealed carry license.
    - Florida Carry
  2. WHSmithIV

    WHSmithIV Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    Messages:
    5,462
    Location:
    Moore, Idaho
    Now, that's just plain weird.
  3. Alpo

    Alpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    11,180
    Location:
    NW Florida
    I don't see where they could get that from.

    >790.01 Carrying concealed weapons.—
    (1) Except as provided in subsection (4), a person who carries a concealed weapon or electric weapon or device on or about his or her person commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
    (2) A person who carries a concealed firearm on or about his or her person commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
    (3) This section does not apply to a person licensed to carry a concealed weapon or a concealed firearm pursuant to the provisions of s. 790.06.
    (4) It is not a violation of this section for a person to carry for purposes of lawful self-defense, in a concealed manner:
    (a) A self-defense chemical spray.
    (b) A nonlethal stun gun or dart-firing stun gun or other nonlethal electric weapon or device that is designed solely for defensive purposes.
    (5) This section does not preclude any prosecution for the use of an electric weapon or device, a dart-firing stun gun, or a self-defense chemical spray during the commission of any criminal offense <

    Hmmmm. Section 2 - A person who carries a concealed firearm commits a felony. Section 3 - THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO PEOPLE WITH A LICENSE TO CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON.
  4. stumpjumper

    stumpjumper Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    680
    Location:
    swflorida
    yeah, i looked at that also. could not find a date on this mackey decision. I'll just keep to following the current laws
  5. al45lc

    al45lc New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,124
    Location:
    colorful colorado
    "Engaged in presumably criminal activity"? From a COURT?
    Think about it, that in itself violates your Constitutional right to innocence until proven otherwise.
    Courts aren't supposed to presume, only interpret.
    What Pre-Law idiot came up with this?
    I wouldn't give this a second thought, it wouldn't hold up in any State Supreme Court.
    AND since the State itself did the licensing, that would open it to lawsuits.
    You can bet this will be on the State Courts mind.
  6. therewolf

    therewolf New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Messages:
    439
    Location:
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Sorry, nice try.

    I, for one, will continue to carry.

    I've followed all guidelines, and attempted in

    all respects, to obey the law. The law states I

    can carry. They even made a superseding law to

    eliminate individual town statutes.

    IMHO the intent and written word of the law

    are clear
    .
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum If you noticed a guy carrying a gun Jun 9, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Carrying in Church ... Apr 4, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Encounter with police while carrying Jan 26, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum CARRYING A FIREARM IN AN OPEN-CARRY STATE DOES NOT CREATE REASONABLE SUSPICION Mar 19, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Philly Cops Harass Man Legally Carrying Gun Nov 16, 2012

Share This Page