Legalization of marijuana

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by robman2629, Nov 7, 2012.

  1. robman2629

    robman2629 Active Member

    Sep 8, 2012
    Alright folks, Colorado passed a law to legalize marijuana for recreational use. From my understanding, a state can not pass a law that trumps a federal law. Going through CJ school, we had this debate many a times about how would it be if it were legalized. It seems as though we wouldnt have to worry about drug cartels that mainly distribute marijuana because we would be able to grow our own. However, what would happen with the people in jail for selling, trafficing, or possesion of marijuana? And how about if this does happen, what about the push to legalized more drugs like heroin or crack. Lets here your thoughts, ready...GO!
  2. Eddie N

    Eddie N New Member

    Apr 23, 2009
    New amendment to the state constitution. It's now going to be a right.:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

  3. B27

    B27 New Member

    Sep 23, 2012
    Atlanta, GA
    The feds will make the state an offer they can't refuse.
  4. Maine04657

    Maine04657 New Member

    Sep 13, 2012
    It is not LEGAL because the state voted and says it is. What has happened is states are saying it is ok to IGNORE federal law. The DEA can still go in and arrest all involved and shut down any of these places if they desire to do so. Odd how pot gets people to vote yes but a right like the 2nd that is in out founding documents no state will stand up and fight for...
  5. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Dec 16, 2008
    Not exactly true. Louisians just did. We passed it by 74%. Protection of the 2nd that is
  6. hogger129

    hogger129 Well-Known Member

    Nov 29, 2009
    I think Mary Jane should be legal for medicinal purposes, not recreational use. We have drunks on the roads killing people in record numbers, now we'll have to worry about somebody high as a kite driving down the highway in a car.
  7. al45lc

    al45lc Active Member

    Mar 8, 2010
    colorful colorado
    In fact, according to the CDC, the number of drunk driving incidents nationwide are down considerably, so I'm not sure how you came to your conclusion otherwise.
    I voted for the amendment, the law as is federally makes no sense in a world where alcohol and tobacco are allowed, it's sheer hyprocrisy.
    There is NO evidence that MJ is a gateway drug, that's propaganda by the old school chronies who looked the other way when their fellow hypocrits were caught drinking and driving, and when tobacco companies were allowed to put carcinogens in tobacco.
    MJ is NOT as addictive nor as mind altering as alcohol according to research, and not as carcinogenic as tobacco.
    Treat it like booze, driving and all, and we will see no real increase in lawlessness, a decrease in crime (it would be legal) and an increase in our much needed tax base.
    It's a win-win, if people can put aside their silly bias against it.
    And NO, I don't smoke anything, period. Never have, never will, and I've been tested for it many times for employment and for security.
  8. Nighthawk

    Nighthawk New Member

    Aug 22, 2006
    South Central Texas
    We can't control it anyway. Legalize it and tax it to death like tobacco.
  9. JohnBrainard

    JohnBrainard New Member

    Sep 11, 2009
    Gilbert, AZ
    The problem with legalizing and taxing is it changes who becomes dependent on the substance. Democrats can't afford for smokers to quit smoking because they're addicted to the money the taxes bring in.
  10. Twicepop

    Twicepop Well-Known Member

    Jan 9, 2012
    NW Ohio
    This is probably not going to be a popular opinion, but here goes. In my opinion they should legalize the stuff, the problems come from the laws, not the useage of pot. We as a country declared a "War on Drugs" many years back, have spent billions maybe trillions by now, of dollars fighting this war, and are no closer to winning it than when they started. What they have done is create fortunes for those that are in the drug trade. Risk drives up prices and profits, and those in the selling of drugs have made an incredible ammount of money because of the risks/laws. Look at the fortunes that were made during Prohibition, and this is no different. As long as people want this product someone will take the risk to get it to them. Prohibition didn't work and neither is this.
  11. carver

    carver Moderator Supporting Member

    I agree 100%! There is no "War On Drugs", never has been! You can't fight a war against an idea, nor can you fight a war against an inanimate object such as drugs. In a War there are two sides, inanimate objects can't finght back! The "War" has always been against the people who may, or may not, use drugs. You, and I!
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2012
  12. g1nomad

    g1nomad New Member

    Mar 23, 2012
    I foresee Colorado's tourism revenue to increase?
  13. carver

    carver Moderator Supporting Member

    Now that's funny!
  14. jbmid1

    jbmid1 Well-Known Member

    Feb 3, 2011
    Tucson, AZ
    That was also a clever way to get people to the polls who might not have participated otherwise. This is probably what gave the state to Obama.
  15. 01brian

    01brian New Member

    Dec 7, 2011
    Interesting thought, but we are just plain full of loons anyway. Mostly from the influx of the californians in the late 80's and early 90's.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Medical Marijuana card holders barred from buying guns. Sep 1, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr "All-American Muslim" Stars Busted for Marijuana Possession at Canadian Border Jan 19, 2012