Less Gun Control = Less Crime

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by 199er, Jun 29, 2010.

  1. 199er

    199er New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Messages:
    627
    Location:
    Columbia SC
    What effect will this court decision have on law abiding citizens and criminals????........................








    17.gif

    12.gif

    22.gif

    31.gif
  2. lentz

    lentz Former Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    606
    Location:
    Arkansas
    *****5 stars!!
  3. 199er

    199er New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Messages:
    627
    Location:
    Columbia SC
    Thanks Lentz. Here's three more that are cute and true..............




    21.gif

    5.gif

    Fairr1.jpg
  4. BrentMizell

    BrentMizell New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1
    While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.


    OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT
    AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE WAR

    On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a
    Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States

    On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.

    Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!
    THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.
    As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here

    Click on the link below for further acknowledgement…..
    http://www.reuters.com/article/politics ... Q920091015


    Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed. This is a very serious matter! Silence will lead us to Socialism!!!
  5. lentz

    lentz Former Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    606
    Location:
    Arkansas
    That link you gave won't produce.What other evidence do you have?
  6. Rocketman1

    Rocketman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,302
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Do you know what this sentance means?

    It means that after the talks, when the treaty would come up for a vote, it gives every nation veto powert. That means that if just one nation disagrees with the words in the treaty, then it will not pass.

    The administration’s agreement to talk about writing a United Nations treaty to regulate arms exports and imports is a far cry from banning possession of firearms. All international treaties require the approval of two-thirds of the Senate before they are considered ratified and in effect.

    The fact is that a provision in the resolution’s preamble – included at the request of the U.S. – explicitly recognizes the right of nations to regulate gun sales and ownership within their borders, including through their constitutions.

    This treaty is nothing new. It goes way back to at least Clinton. It was voted for in the past and the US used veto power to shut down the treaty. Hillary would not agree to talks unless every nation had veto power. Also, two weeks before the General Assembly voted on the measure, Secretary of State Clinton stated a key condition of U.S. approval and made sure the caveat made it into the resolution: The 2012 conference must make its decisions by "consensus," she said. In practical terms, that means every country has veto power on the negotiated agreement, and it won’t go into effect without the approval of all. In short, no treaty will take effect if the U.S. does not agree. And again, the uS would not agree to even having the talks about the treaty, unless every nation had veto power.
  7. Rocketman1

    Rocketman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,302
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Thanks 199er, that made my day! I give it 10 Starts.
  8. jim summers

    jim summers Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,191
    Location:
    I reside in southern Indiana, you can almost step
    Thanks Rocketman i feel better now, i would hate to think that i might lose my Red Ryder BB gun.
  9. Rocketman1

    Rocketman1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,302
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
    Well... You never know, but I think not.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum HARVARD STUDY: NO CORRELATION BETWEEN GUN CONTROL AND LESS VIOLENT CRIME Aug 29, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum A lesson in ''Gun Control'' from down under Apr 17, 2003
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum One Shot .... With A .22 No Less ! Sep 3, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum A Short History Lesson! Jul 4, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum More Guns ( STILL ) Equal Less Crime .... Oct 2, 2011

Share This Page