1. Get Gear'd Up! Enter to WIN $1000 in gear!

    Please Click Here for full details and to enter. You will need to be registered and logged in to view the details and to participate.

    Thanks and good luck to everyone

Load data for HSM frustration

Discussion in 'The Ammo & Reloading Forum' started by rocklinskier, Jan 3, 2011.

  1. rocklinskier

    rocklinskier New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    Bought some HSM 125g plated FN to load for plinking with my 357 and for 38spcl for my Pop.

    Frustration mounts, I can't find ANY load data that makes any kind of sense.

    The only info I can find says 'find similar load data to a lead bullet'

    Can't seem to find any 38 Spcl lead 125 loads. Did find jacketed info, but how do you know if the bullet is at all similar. Also, those listed COAL's would put the cannelure completely out of the mouth of the case....so not so similar.

    Tried to contact HSM, the only link I can find is The Hunting Shack. Thinking that maybe HSM stands for Hunting Shack Munitions or some such similar name, I called them. (montana address)

    The guy there says they don't make the bullets. I asked if he could give me any resources for the load info.....he just regurgitated the "use lead data of similar bullet" speech. he recomended going to the powder man. site for data. Did that, guess what. No 125 lead bullet listed for alliant (plan to use bullseye or unique)

    If it's that impossible to get any load data, I'm thinking this will be the one and only box of bullets I buy from this company.
  2. retired grunt

    retired grunt New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    416
    Location:
    Northern NY
  3. rocklinskier

    rocklinskier New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    Yes, I saw that info on their webpage, but what is the similar bullet?

    Speer list no lead bullet
    Lyman list no lead bullet

    Alliant list speers jacketed bullets.

    All of the above have different COAL's for their 155 jacketed....so once again, where does one start? I can't find any 'similar bullet'

    When I talked to The Hunting Shack...they said "absolutely do not use jacketed bullet info" and refered me to Alliants website, which of course only list data for jacketed bullet in that caliper and weight.

    It's like talking to the government
  4. retired grunt

    retired grunt New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    416
    Location:
    Northern NY
    Cast Bullets
    Consult a loading manual and select a comparable lead bullet in weight and style and use that load data for cast bullets.
    If you don’t have access to load data for lead bullets, reduce the load for a similar jacketed bullet by 10%.

    Taken from the page I linked to
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2011
  5. retired grunt

    retired grunt New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    416
    Location:
    Northern NY
  6. LDBennett

    LDBennett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,700
    Location:
    Hesperia, CA
    rocklinskier:

    The Lyman Reloading Handbook 49th Edition lists cast bullet loads for 120 grain (close enough!) bullets with Bullseye and Unique for both 38 Special and 357 MAG.

    If you are shooting and reloading for cast bullet regularly you NEED this reloading manual. If you don't have at least three of four reloading manuals then your data base for reloading is seriously impaired.

    As for the Cartridge OAL specs, the web page for the bullet says to use the LEE crimper and explains why and how. Did you miss that? The LEE crimp does not have to fall in a canalure according to the bullet manufacturer.

    If the canalure falls in the wrong place I still try to use it with a regular crimp die as long as the COAL is not shorter than recommended and the ammo fits the gun it is to be used in. If the bullets were intended for 38SPL or 357MAG the cannalure provided should work. If it will not work I'd change brands of bullet or perhaps try the LEE crimp die as they suggested. There are several choices of plated bullet, two of which are Rainier and Berrys Bullets.

    LDBennett
  7. rocklinskier

    rocklinskier New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    RG,

    The same mantra keeps going round and round....use data from a comparible bullet.

    The chart you refered me too, yes, it does have data for 125g bullet, but no COAL, no description of said bullet. It could be a Lyman cast, it coulb be a RCBS cast, or any other array of bullets that have little to no comparable feature to my bullet.

    I have decided a COAL determined by the canalure on the bullet, but at that given length, there is no corresponding data that I have found for that. And without a chrony, there is no way to know what I am getting assuming that the gun doesn't go Ka-Boom

    Apparently no one here has tried these particular bullets or have any data to share, so I may even just cut my loses at chuck the stupid things. $25 (box of 250) of bullets is not worth damage to me or my gun.

    As for HSM....never again. To me, this is like buying a set of truck tires, getting them mounted, and then the info on the sidewall says "Load ranges and inflation pressures can be found on comparible tires from other manufacturers" Dont think so. Especially if those tires could cause you bodily injury.

    Major manufacturers print load data. Rainier, Laser cast, etc. are glad to give you start loads, and even detailed data for their bullets. HSM doesn't even want to give you the most basic info or any customer support.

    Now perhaps I'm being hard nosed here, but to me, a company should be who makes reloading components, should not be this difficult to get information from. Customer service rating '0' from this consumer.

    If there were a website, phone #, or anyone who would admit to working for HSM, I would contact them with my dis-satifaction. Bottom line, I have already wasted more time trying to find a simple starting point than the bullets are worth. I think I will make fishing weights out of them and move on!
  8. LDBennett

    LDBennett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,700
    Location:
    Hesperia, CA
    Just use the data in the Lyman manual. This is not rocket science. The data there will work just fine. It does include COAL lengths, both recommended and maximum. Just stay between them and you are fine.

    LDBennett
  9. rocklinskier

    rocklinskier New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    The lymann book shows a 150 g that is much different design than the 155 HSM. Lyman list COAL as 1.090 the HSM COAL (as determined by the canelure) is 1.420

    Lymans 125 J (which The Hunting Shak guy say "DO NO USE")shows COAL as 1.125....again, drastically diff than 1.420. So how can one say that it is comparible. If the COAL was even CLOSE, I would feel it could be a starting point, but with a difference of .300, that seems scetchy.
  10. LDBennett

    LDBennett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,700
    Location:
    Hesperia, CA
    rocklinskier:

    I sure don't know what data you are looking at but there is no data in MY Lyman manual that shows any bullet for 38SPL that is 1.090 COAL???? That is 9mm specs or ????? The length should be for 38 Special around approximately 1.5 inches! and for 357 MAG around approximately 1.6 inches. What in the world are you looking at?

    If you are bound and determined to throw away your box of bullets then be my guest. But you are not using data I see in the Lyman manual.

    It makes little difference what the the bullet shape is for these cast bullet loads. What is important is that you do not make the remaining cavity where the powder resides any smaller than the data suggests or too long so that the cartridge will not fit the gun. It may take a little math but it is doable.

    LDBennett
  11. rocklinskier

    rocklinskier New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    Oops,...my apologies, your right, I let the page flip (grabbed the book in a hurry)....there is a 120gr rn (again, very diff looking than my plated FN) but it does show a 1.45...at least thats in the ball park from my 1.410-1.420. .030 length difference. The bullet base shown is VERY different...is there any way to know the cavity calculation without having the bullet from the book? That lyman bullet #356242 is a double groove, lead cast. Mine is a cylindrical,smooth base with only a canalure groove in the plating. Actually looks very much like the jacketed HPJ on pate 353 (hornady JHP#35710) , but again, diff. data, not at all coresponding to the "lead" load, and having been warned to not use that data......

    It just seems like a lot of trial, error, and unknowns to just get to a starting place. I think I will buy a box of Laser cast (who is more than willing to provide info) and move on. Time it take to test unknown starts, set up/borrow a chrony, etc. just to get a base to build on....not worth it.

    Thanks for pointing out the oops though...I am a little :eek:
  12. mikld

    mikld Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2009
    Messages:
    910
    Location:
    Oregon
    For revolver loads forget OAL for now. Crimp in the crimp groove or cannalure. Just follow listed load data and manufacturer's directions and don't overthink the process. :rolleyes:
  13. LDBennett

    LDBennett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,700
    Location:
    Hesperia, CA
    rocklinskier:

    You can scale the picture in the Lyman Manual to determine the size of the cavity behind the bullet. OR.......

    These bullet were made for 357 and 38 SPL (I assume if the packaging is so marked). If you load at the starting load for both 38 and 357 and crimp into the canalure and if you get into the range between the suggested COAL and the Max COAL for the cartridge (as shown on the drawing on the first pages of each section) you will probably be fine. If you are worried then load up a couple of each and fire them to check for excessive pressures.

    If you stay away from full loads most pistol cartridges are pretty tolerant of bullet type (cast bullets we are talking about here). Just don't seat the bullet too deeply. Bullets made for a specific cartridge usually have the canalure exactly where it needs to be.

    As far as using straight cast bullet without the plating, you may see leading in the barrel. If you keep the load level to under 1000 FPS you MAY not get any leading. If you load plated bullet to less than 1000 FPS you will NOT see any bore leading, in my experience.

    Sorry to get so brutal with you but your responses were pretty agitated. We are here to help but you have to do your part to earn that help. That means read the manuals and have several manuals so that you can attempt to figure out the answer before coming to us. Reloading is not a natural thing. You have to educate yourself as it is new to everyone in the beginning. Do it wrong and you and your gun risk being hurt. I think you may be on the right path now. Good luck and feel free to ask questions after you have studied the subject as much as you can. Believe it or not ALL the answers are in the manuals but it takes several to get the full picture.

    LDBennett
  14. howlnmad

    howlnmad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    5,066
    Location:
    Harriman, Tn
    And if after all that you're still uncomfortable with them, Drop me a PM, I'll buy them from you.

    howlnmad
  15. rocklinskier

    rocklinskier New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    LD,

    I did not take anything you said as "brutal". My apparent agitation was and is with the manufacturer of said component, not with anyone on this board.

    And of course, my mis-quote of the COAL from the wrong page this A.M. made me look stupid, but I did acknowledge that mistake.

    As far as not putting effort into the cause, I've spent hours combing thru the three manuals I have. (speer, lyman, hornady + data from Oregon Trail) I suppose that even though it's not rocket science, three sources may not be enough to build on. Since all three list fairly different data for the caliper, makes it even more confusing.

    My frustration is that HSM is not willing to even be contacted for the most simple of questions. Just not a good experience for me.

    all the reading preaches over and over again the dangers of not using proper data etc. hence my hesitation to just throw a load based on data that was just soley related to the same weight bullet, but with not much more to go on.

    What I am seeing here from those of you who have reloaded far longer than I, is that the data is not so critical to the bullet shape, length, design, etc. as long as the weight is similar. (yes, that is not perhaps verbatim, but you get the drift) I think the quote was "it's not rocket science".

    I will take your advise, and give it a try with the min loads listed in the Lyman book. But i will not be buying any more HSM lead. It's just so much easier with any of the other bullets I have purchased for my other weapons to find and formulate a reasonable and comfortable starting point. As I mentioned, Laser cast (oregon trail) and rainier are more than happy to provide basic info for getting started with their cast products, and i am much more comfortable with that.

    Much thanks to those of you who made the effort(s) to help. I apologize if my comments were taken as disrespectful. Not meant that way.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Ammo & Reloading Forum Barnes 170 grain LRX bullet load data Wednesday at 11:46 AM
The Ammo & Reloading Forum reload data work up sheets Wednesday at 11:35 AM
The Ammo & Reloading Forum Magtech schp 38s/.357 reloading data needed Oct 3, 2014
The Ammo & Reloading Forum 6.5x55 and 264 win mag load data Sep 24, 2014
The Ammo & Reloading Forum RG4895 Reloading data -- another Question Sep 20, 2014

Share This Page