1. Get Gear'd Up! Enter to WIN $1000 in gear!

    Please Click Here for full details and to enter. You will need to be registered and logged in to view the details and to participate.

    Thanks and good luck to everyone

Model 1903 Mannlicher 7x57

Discussion in 'The Ask the Pros & What's It Worth? Forum' started by Bill Blower, Dec 26, 2006.

  1. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    I've got a Model 1903 Mannlicher 7x57 that was given to my son by his father in law and we'd like some information on the age, etc. We understand that most Model 1903s were in 6.5x54 with a full stock. Since this rifle has a half stock and is a 7x57, it is probably a custom rifle or has been rebored. There is a claw mount for a scope, and we're wondering what the chances are of getting the rest of the mount. Any and all information would be much appreciated.

    Attached Files:

  2. Xracer

    Xracer *TFF Admin Staff Mediator*

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2001
    Messages:
    9,141
    Location:
    Minn-eeee-sota, ya, sure, you bet!
    Hi Bill......welcome to TFF.

    Beautiful rifle.....but it might be a Model 1910 and not a 1903. The 1910 was available as a half-stocked rifle (the carbine had a full length stock) and was offered in a number of calibers, including 7x57.
  3. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Xracer
    Thank you.
    That is the kind of information that we are looking for. I have since found out that it was made in 1919. The model number is mostly covered by the front claw mount but the bottom of the numbers look like they are 1903.
    Do you know any way to distinguish model 1903 from 1910, other than the short stock & caliber?
    Thanks again,
    Bill
  4. Xracer

    Xracer *TFF Admin Staff Mediator*

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2001
    Messages:
    9,141
    Location:
    Minn-eeee-sota, ya, sure, you bet!
    Truthfully Bill....no.

    The various carbines (1903, 1905, 1908, & 1910) all had a full length stock. I believe that the rifles (same models) were available in either full or half stocks and both carbines & rifles were available with single or double set triggers.

    The only real difference with each succeeding model was that the newer model was available in different calibers.

    1903 (carbine & rifle) - 6.5x54mm M-S

    1905 (carbine & rifle) - 9x56mm M-S

    1908 (carbine & rifle) - 8x56mm M-S

    1910 (carbine & rifle) - 9x56mm M-S, 7x57mm, 8x57mm

    1924 High Velocity Sporting Rifle - .30-06, 7x64mm, 8x60mm, 9.3x62mm, 10.75x68mm

    I would guess from the 1919 build date & caliber, that yours is a Model 1910.....but I'm not really sure.

    Your's appears to be in really nice shape, and if it's a 1910, the Blue Book value is:

    95% - $900
    90% - $700
  5. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Thans Xracer:

    I'll keep looking around and try to pin down the model. I forgot to mention to start with that it has a 17 3/4" barrel. If I could find another rifle like this for under $1000 I would grab it for myself!

    Bill
  6. stash247

    stash247 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,811
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Bill, look at your chamber markings; This was originally a 6.5mm rifle (The stamp at 1:eek:clock) If now in 7X57, it has been re-bored.
    I'll dig around here and see what I can find, on the subject, but the one thing I am certain of, is that if it was rebored, there will be evidence of re-work, or replacement, to be found on the spool of the magazine; these were unique to any given caliber, and seldom would feed, with another.
    The 6.5 proof mark is at 1 oclock, down on the rh side, lower, is what appears to be a 7X57 proof.
    Please post a pic of those markings, as it will be a big aid in IDing the rifle, accurately!
    Thanks.
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2006
  7. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Stash247
    I can't find any evidence of rework on the spool. It has the same serial number & other than that a "K" in one spot. There is 1848 stamped near the eject button.
    I'm sending more proof pics.
    Bill

    Attached Files:

  8. Mark

    Mark New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    314
    IMO, the spool has been cobbled on. The 6.5X54's I've seen all had immaculate polished spools.
    A picture of the bolt face may help. The 6.5X54 is .450 ish, the 7X57 is .473 ish. The bolt face would have to be opened up for this conversion. There may be witness of the machining.
    Mark
  9. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Mark,
    Thanks for your input. I am sending pics of the bolt face to see if that will help.
    Bill

    Attached Files:

  10. Mark

    Mark New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    314
    Boy, do I feel dumb.

    I thought the bolt face was recessed like a Mauser. Not really much help here.
    Mark
  11. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Mark:

    Nice try anyway, and that explains why I could'nt find a place on the bolt face to measure!

    Maybe those new proof mark pics I sent will help solve the mystery.

    Bill.
  12. stash247

    stash247 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,811
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Bill, blow in Mark's ear: Mausers have a flat bolt face, too!
    If a grand would solve all these problems, I'd love to offer this old rifle a new home!
    More to the point, regardless of the model, you have a finely crafted rifle, well worth whatever maintainance it requires, that will do nothing but appreciate, in value! Hanging the bolt handle in the middle was a goofy thing to do, back then, I am told, but seems to have eliminated all the binding that other rifles encountered, back then. The rotary spool magazine was unique to the Mannlicher Schoenauer, and Savage, in the M-99.
    Takedown, requiring nothing but a loaded round, for a tool, also, unique, to the rifle.
    I truly hope that your son in law chooses never to sell this rifle, as it is irreplacable, but, should he choose otherwise, I have a place for it, and cash.
  13. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    stash247
    It's my son that has the gun, and he knows how lucky he is. He also has a son who is interested in hunting so this beauty will be in the family for a long , long time!
    I gather that the pics of the proofs didn't prove anything.
    Anyway I learned from this, and thank you all very, very much for your efforts.
    I will be keeping my eyes open for one for myself!

    Bill
  14. ibtrukn

    ibtrukn New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    4,335
    Location:
    central N.J.
    BB, VERY nice old Steyr, if it was kal22 I wood REELY want it. as far as those claw mounts, in my somewot limited (ok non xistent) xperiance, those scopes were setup for eaach individual rifle, the "hole" spacing can differ, sumtimes by a bunch. a pal of mine just fitted a Zeiss w/claw to a nokout cape gun by hogging the mounts a little bit. luckily the lateral spacing was almost xactly the same. just hadto take off a bit of inside metal to make the fit. but he was fortunate (also a classA #1 gunsmith). Look around out there it just like wimen, the chase is 1/2 the fun:cool:


    ps:my book indicates mod 1910 has double set trigger & 2 leaf rear site. does yours? if not prally (mebbe) a reworked 1903, still a prize ( and U no howta take a good pic.!
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2007
  15. Bill Blower

    Bill Blower New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    ibtrukn:
    OK good stuff. I guess that's one problem with detach scopes, they get separated from the gun!

    This gun has the double trigs and two leaf sight, but I took a closer look at the little bit of Mod# that you can still see that isn't covered by the scope mount (check new pic) and to the right of the scope alignment mark the numbers are round on the bottom as in 903, 905, etc. so it is pre 1910. Did they make these early models even after the M 1910 came out? If not then my manuf. date of 1919 would be wrong.

    Can someone with an early model check their bolt face and see if the extractor has the same amout of meat on it? Mine wouldn't be changed very much, because (by checking the sizes of the 6.5 and 7mm in Barnes "cartridges of the world") there would only have to be about .012 taken off on each side, .023 altogether.

    Bill

    Attached Files:

Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Ask the Pros & What's It Worth? Forum Colt Model 1903 .32 ACP U.S. Property - a gift from Eisenhower? Jun 27, 2014
The Ask the Pros & What's It Worth? Forum S&W .32 CTG Model 1903?? Oct 8, 2013
The Ask the Pros & What's It Worth? Forum Model 1903 Remington Oct 13, 2012
The Ask the Pros & What's It Worth? Forum Colt Model 1903 Pocket Hammer .38 ACP - Rimless Smokeless May 10, 2012
The Ask the Pros & What's It Worth? Forum springfield model 1903 Mar 15, 2012

Share This Page