MORE NRA BETRAYAL

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by Marlin, Sep 6, 2007.

  1. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    This is self-explanatory!!!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    ALERT FROM JEWS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FIREARMS OWNERSHIP
    America's Aggressive Civil Rights Organization

    September 6, 2007

    JPFO ALERT: NRA Director Says Five Rounds is Enough

    That JPFO and the NRA have different views on "gun control"
    is no secret; you can read our position -- and view
    supporting evidence -- at
    http://www.jpfo.org/alert20061211.htm . You can also read
    an article on the NRA's recent alignment with gun-
    prohibitionist Carolyn McCarthy at
    http://www.jpfo.org/smith-nra.htm .

    And now, NRA Director Joaquin Jackson has publically stated
    that magazine capacities should be limited to five rounds
    and that "assault weapons [sic] should be limited to military
    or police." That's right -- a director of the supposedly
    pro-gun NRA wants to take YOUR semi-automatic rifles away.

    Don't believe us? Think it's just a rumor? View the evidence
    for yourself at
    http://www.klru.org/texasmonthlytalks/archives/movies/jackson5_44k.mov
    (we also have it mirrored on the JPFO site at
    http://www.jpfo.org/joaquin.mov ).

    Already the NRA apologists are coming out of the woodwork.
    Anyone who points out the hypocrisy of Jackson's position are
    denounced as "wackos", "black helicopter paranoids," and "just
    trying to make a buck."

    It's time to "Humiliate and Repudiate" Joaquin Jackson and
    the NRA. Go to http://www.jpfo.org/handbill-joaquin.jpg to
    see our latest handbill. Print it out and distribute it to
    those who still believe the NRA is working in the interest
    of gun owners. They are not.

    If you value the truth more than betrayal and want an
    aggressive defense of your natural and Second Amendment
    rights, visit http://www.jpfo.org/member.htm to learn how
    you can join JPFO. We encourage you to use our "gun control"
    destroying books and videos ( http://shop.jpfo.org ) and get
    on board with us today.

    - The Liberty Crew

    PS Don't forget that you can view all our "Humiliate and
    Repudiate" handbills at http://www.jpfo.org/freebies.htm

    ============================================================
    Visit our alert archive at www.jpfo.org/alerts.htm
    ============================================================

    JPFO mirror site: http://www.jpfo.net

    ============================================================
     
  2. You know, Marlin, I've wondered for quite a long while if the anti-gunners have somehow managed surreptitiously to infiltrate the NRA. In the past, the NRA has been highly influential in the defeat of leftist candidates, as Clinton found out in 1996. Could it be that the anti-gunners are now trying a different, more subtle tactic? Personally, I would have dropped my membership in NRA a long time ago were it not a requirement for membership in the range where I shoot.
     

  3. pickenup

    pickenup Active Member

    Kinda shows which side they are on, doesn't it? :mad:
     
  4. Looks like yet another reason why I'm a member of GOA (Gunowners of America). GOA is like JPFO no compromise!
     
  5. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    May 26, 2007
    Rochester, NY
    While GOA may be a worthwhile organization, their website leaves much to be desired. The site looks like the "rookie amateur hour." Very poor presentation and organization.

    I'm sorry, but, if I'm to be even tempted to join an organization, it's got to at least LOOK like it has its act together.

    I'd expect it to look like that if memberships were free, but they charge, and it should look professional. It's relatively inexpensive to have a professionally done site built these days.

    I don't mean to offend, but the comments are offered as my opinion only (someone who does graphic design and video production professionally).
     
  6. Millwright

    Millwright Well-Known Member

    Jun 30, 2005
    Hmmmm....I'd suggest looking at all of what Jackson said, not the expurgated interview reported........and posted across the web at lightspeed it would seem. >MW
     
  7. berto64

    berto64 Active Member

    I've read his retraction and it reminds me of a cat trying to cover his leavings but there's not enough litter in the box to hide it all.

    JMHO and I have never thought much of Jackson as a person.
     
  8. Tom Militano

    Tom Militano New Member

    Feb 26, 2007
    Jacksonville, AL
    I've been a Life Member of the NRA since 1970 and I'm about ready to send them my card back.
     
  9. Chad10mm

    Chad10mm New Member

    16
    Sep 8, 2007
    Citrus Cnty, FL
    When I first posted here recently I made the comment about it being nice to not get bashed for supporting GOA. The above quote was exactly the attitude at a popular firearms forum I'd been involved in for some time and it basically ran me off.

    Aside from that my fear is that NRAs position on this and hr2640 is going to do incredible damage in regards to the fence-sitters and uninformed non-firearm owners who tend to throw their support in the direction of whoever makes the most noise.
     
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum One more question about the Electoral college Nov 10, 2016
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum More drivel from a Hollywood knucklehead Mar 23, 2016
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Obama speech tonight. More gun control? Dec 6, 2015
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Another mass killer - more federal gun control coming? Jun 18, 2015
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Had My Required Yearly Physical, Yep Guns Were On The Questioner, No More Jul 29, 2014