My son might be safer in Irag

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by armedandsafe, Nov 1, 2003.

  1. armedandsafe

    armedandsafe Guest

    Media Spins News of Iraq GI Death Toll
    By Alan Caruba © 2003
    It's no secret that most of the mainstream US media was against the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq and, even during the brief combat phase, was already calling it a "quagmire." Since the declaration that major combat had ended in May, every single casualty has been reported. The implied message is that we should get out of Iraq, that our mission there is foolhardy and wasteful of our soldier's lives.
    On Saturday, October 18, when the Newark, NJ Star-Ledger, the largest circulation daily in the State, led page one with the headline "Postwar Iraq GI death toll passes 100", I was reminded that, on the previous day, the Essex County edition had a story that reported "So far this year, 65 people have been slain in Newark, sometimes in spurts as in the one beginning Oct 3 when four people were killed and eight injured by gunshots or stab wounds during a 32-hour period."

    Does it seem to you that, statistically, your life is at greater risk in Newark, NJ than downtown Baghdad or Basra? Now Essex is just one of twenty-one New Jersey counties and you can be pretty sure that, in my State alone, more people have been shot, stabbed and beaten to death than the entire US military currently engaged in some serious fighting in Iraq. And that's just from January of this year.

    But let's not restrict ourselves to New Jersey. As your local newspaper or television news reports each US combat loss in Iraq, a nation the size of California, back in May when the major combat phase was over, the police in Phoenix, Arizona, were puzzling over why the homicide rate there was up 67% over the previous year. By May, 105 citizens had met violent deaths.

    By August, New Orleans had chalked up 150 homicides and that isn't even counting the rest of Louisiana. Only 146 US soldiers had died in the brief period of combat that led to the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. If the current rate of corpses keeps piling up in the Crescent City, law enforcement authorities there think it will be on track to become the nation's murder capitol for the first time since way back in 1964.

    While the news media keep reminding us that we are, indeed, suffering losses in Iraq due to cowardly and murderous former supporters of Saddam Hussein, plus all kinds of al Qaeda riff-raff, with who-knows-how-many Iranian provocateurs, the murder rate in Philadelphia, by early August, was up 23% with---are you ready for this---198 killed. At that pace, by the end of 2003, the city will experience 337 murders. Across the nation in Oakland, California, that city was marking its 76 murders as of late August.

    And in Washington, DC, our nation's capital and workplace of so many Democrat politicians eager to denounce the President, by June the District had reclaimed its status as the murder capital of the United States. According to FBI statistics, the city had a higher homicide rate than any other city in the nation with more than 500,000 residents.

    Yes, dear reader, statistically you have a better chance of being shot to death in Washington, DC than in Baghdad. So, the next time your local daily or nightly TV news trumpets the number of US battle casualties in Iraq, you should probably give some thought to wearing a bulletproof vest if you plan to visit the Lincoln Memorial.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Alan Caruba is the author of a new book, "Warning Signs", and a commentator whose weekly column is posted on the Internet site of The National Anxiety Center.
    Copyright, Alan Caruba, 2003

    The Sierra Times maintains its operation only by our sponsors and our readers. As always, any contribution is desperately needed and always accepted. Thank you.

    Visa, Master Card, and Paypal Contributions accepted




    Copyright 2003 The Sierra Times




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Permission to reprint/republish granted, as long as you include the name of our site, the author, and our URL. www.SierraTimes.com All Sierra Times news reports, and all editorials are © 2003 SierraTimes.com (unless otherwise noted)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SierraTimes.com™ A Subsidiary of J.J. Johnson Enterprises, Inc.




    http://www.sierratimes.com/alcaruba.htm
  2. redhawk44

    redhawk44 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    36
    How many people live in Newark NJ?

    We have about 130,000 American troops in Iraq. How does that compare with the Newark population?
  3. armedandsafe

    armedandsafe Guest

    You are skewing the statistics by looking at it that way. The rate statistics for Newark would be taken on a total population basis, not just those living in vulnerable areas or with vulnerable occupations. The point being made here is that the media is making a larger "OMG" out of casualities than is warranted, given that they don't give the same, or similar coverage to the daily carnage wrought on civilians disarmed by inane gun laws.

    Pops
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum The High and Might Be. . . . Her Honor, Barbie Boxer. . . . Jun 20, 2009
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum might need help in California Aug 17, 2008
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum DC might get a little freedom back,,, Nov 13, 2004
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Assault Weapons Ban might be coming back! Jun 2, 2004
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum PBS might choke on this one May 6, 2003

Share This Page