Nancy Pelosi is NUTS!

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Bruce FLinch, Jul 26, 2007.

  1. Bruce FLinch

    Bruce FLinch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Bay Point, Kali..aka Gun Point
    Read the last paragraph even if you skip the rest ~ this lady is a nut case!
    You aren't going to believe this.
    Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall tax all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K's and Mutual Funds! Alas it is true. All to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!





    Boy, are we in trouble... This woman is frightening. Take special note of the last paragraph. Is she really this whacked out?
    Nancy Pelosi condemned the new record highs of the stock market as "just another example of Bush policies helping the rich get richer". "First Bush cut taxes for the rich and the economy has rebounded with new record low unemployment rates, which only means wealthy employers are getting even wealthier at the expense of the underpaid working class".
    She went on to say "Despite the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq our economy is still strong an d government tax revenues are at all time highs What this really means is that business is exploiting the war effort and working Americans, just to put money in their own pockets".
    When questioned about recent stock market highs she responded "Only the rich benefit from these record highs. Working Americans, welfare recipients, the unemployed and minorities are not sharing in these obscene record highs". "There is no question these windfall profits and income created by the Bush administration need to be taxed at 100% rate and those dollars redistributed to the poor and working class". "Profits from the stock market do not reward the hard work of our working class who, by their hard work, are responsible for generating these corporate profits that create stock market profits for the rich. We in congress will need to address this issue to either tax these profits or to control th e stock market to prevent this unearned income t o flow to the rich."
    When asked about the fact that over 80% of all Americans have investments in mutual funds, retirement funds, 401K's, and the stock marke t she replied "That may be true, but probably only 5% account for 90% of all these investment dollars. That's just more "trickle down" economics claiming that if a corporation is successful that everyone from the CEO to the floor sweeper benefit from higher wages and job security which is ridiculous". "How much of this 'trickle down' ever get to the unemployed and minorities in our county? None, and that's the tragedy of these stock market highs."
    "We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower Federal Income Tax tax payers off the roles and increase government income substantially. We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."
    When aske d how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied ; ; "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as "Americans"."


    Bruce Flinch says: "Nancy Pelosi, Kiss my middle-class butt. I went to school, served in the Navy, have worked a job since I was 12 years old. And you want to GIVE away the farm? Kiss my BUTT! "
  2. Nighthawk

    Nighthawk New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    3,330
    Location:
    South Central Texas
    Pelosi is NUTS- this something new - NOT;)
  3. Marlin T

    Marlin T Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,877
    Location:
    New Mexico
    No way, did she really say all that stuff?
    Come on I wouldn’t expect that kind of talk EVEN from a Democrat.
  4. 22WRF

    22WRF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,514
    Location:
    Pea Ridge, FL
    Thats not news :)


    She better check her portfolio this afternoon with the DOW in the tank to the tune of 400+ and down 600+ since last week.
  5. satellite66

    satellite66 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,066
    Location:
    Central NJ
    What do you expect from a do as I say not as I do commy liberal puke gun hater? I can't even imagine voting for a dem as long as their party is lead by the likes of this.
    Only the rich benefit. I guess she has no clue that almost all pension funds are in the stock market.
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2007
  6. glocknut

    glocknut New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    12,490
    Location:
    THE FORUM MASCOTT...
    Revolution anyone?


    No? Ha...thought so.... :rolleyes:

    mike
    gn
  7. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,850
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    and y' all thought I was kidding. This is the plain truth:

    Attached Files:

  8. durk

    durk New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,027
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Sometimes they show their real colors!:mad:
  9. Rommelvon

    Rommelvon New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,452
    Location:
    Goldsboro, NC
    She's crazier than an outhouse rat!!!!
  10. Huck Finn

    Huck Finn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    875
    As I've said before... "Facts are like Kryptonite to republicans".

    Ninety seconds of fact checking revealed scores of conservative blogs spouting this tripe, but for some reason the only "real" news organization that mentioned it was the Seattle Times. It was in an article debunking other urban legends, like," the secret plan to build a superhighway, a giant 10- to 12-lane production, from the Yucatán to the Yukon. This "SuperCorridor" would allow the really big part of the plan to take place: the merging of the governments of Canada, the United States and Mexico. Say goodbye to the dollar, and maybe even the English language.
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003713518_rumor19.html

    Here's what Snopes had to say about the latest Pelosi exposé.
    "Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said the Democrats propose to repeal $4 billion in tax breaks and subsidies from the Energy Policy Act, repeal royalty relief, "saving tax payers $20 billion over the next 25 years," and "repeal $8.6 billion in tax loopholes for energy and large oil companies."
    However, the item reproduced above, quoting Rep. Pelosi as disdaining recent stock market gains and endorsing a 100% on windfall profits gained from stocks (with the proceeds to be "redistributed to the poor and working class") does not correspond to anything she actually said or proposed. It's a parody based on extremes of Democratic stereotypes — expressing scorn for corporate profits, favoring huge tax rates for high-income earners, wanting to confiscate money from the rich to give to "illegal immigrants" and "unemployed minorities" — that was written as a bit of pre-election satire and falsely attributed to a pair of New York Times reporters.
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp

    In the interest of being "fair and balanced" I'd like to put an end to the urban legend that that Geo. Bush never went to Viet Nam. NOTHING could be further from from the truth! Here is a picture of him taken in Viet Nam
    Main stream media claims that it was in fact taken in country (35 years after the war was over), but there are still some blogs out there saying that this is the photo he used in the 60's and 70's to get out of going there while things were still hot over there. DON'T BELIEVE A WORD OF IT!!! My only regret is that I have no way to prove my statement is true.
    Yours, as always,
    Huck

    Attached Files:

  11. glocknut

    glocknut New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    12,490
    Location:
    THE FORUM MASCOTT...
    Huck...i heard Senator biden say the other day on tv that if you love guns you must be wrong in the head.... SO THERE...from the mouth of a democrat...YOU, HUCK FINN...ARE WRONG IN THE HEAD!!!!!!!!!!!

    [carpet bombing mode off...]

    mike
    gn
  12. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,850
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    Remember our congeniality, folks.....
  13. henry0reilly

    henry0reilly Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    553
    Location:
    Indiana
    Nancy Pelosi is NUTS! - Yep, she sure is

    What they need our help with is sending their sorry asses back where they came from. The money saved would go a long long way to raising the standard of living for everyone here legally.
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2007
  14. Tom Militano

    Tom Militano New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,255
    Location:
    Jacksonville, AL
    I couldn't agree more!!
  15. glocknut

    glocknut New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    12,490
    Location:
    THE FORUM MASCOTT...
    Re: Nancy Pelosi is NUTS! - Yep, she sure is

    Ditto !!!!!!!

    mike
    gn
  16. White Hawk

    White Hawk New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    457
    Of course the quote is bogus. No self-loving "progressive" politican would ever call an illegal immigrant an illegal immigrant. They are either "undocumented workers" or "undocumented Americans" (That was Reid, if you'd like to try proving that a myth, Huck.). No liberal activist politician worth their Gulfstream would ever use the word "illegal" in describing the hordes of "undocumented" DUI killers that have flooded our streets in the last ten years. Nor would they dare use such a demeaning or offensive word to describe "unodcumented" rapists (including child rapists) who came over with the drunk friends. Why, they'd sooner use the words "perjury" and "Bill Clinton" in the same sentence! So I didn't need Snopes to tell me she didn't say that.

    But Pelosi is still nuts.
  17. Huck Finn

    Huck Finn Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    875
    Mike, I won't disagree that I might be wrong in the head, no argument there:D . But as to the Biden quote I believe that Biden said about Jared Townsend (only, NOT all gun owners)was "If that's his baby, he needs help" You have to admit that the guy asking the question made ALL gun owners look like a bunch of Bubbas or gang bangers, But Biden didn't say "that if you love guns you must be wrong in the head" , he was merely referring to the fool who decided to represent all gun owners in such a negative light. I'm really surprised that more anger isn't being directed at the fool who presented such an important question in such an assanine manner. My first reaction when i saw the video was what a *&%#@ jerk this guy is! One more thing, how did he buy that AR under the gun ban as he stated? Did he just admit to felony possession of a firearm that would automatically prohibit him from owning any weapon???

    But anyway, it's good to be back and hearing from all of you.
    Take care,
    Huck (the liberal, commie,elitist Democrat, unfundamentalist environmentalist,
    kook) Finn
  18. satellite66

    satellite66 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,066
    Location:
    Central NJ
    Huck how far will you bend over to support any dem? Biden was out of line and anyone who owns a gun should be offended and concerned that this is what the modern dem party thinks of our rights and the constitution.
  19. njretcop

    njretcop New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,538
    Location:
    NJ
    I don't think that Biden's brain surgery worked........:rolleyes:
  20. White Hawk

    White Hawk New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    457
    Huck, the debate was hosted by CNN. Did you really believe they would to chose a question presented by someone who represented gun owners in a good light?!? You give your fellow liberals way to much credit. (I'd usually make the comparison to a moderate Muslim who deliberately turns a blind eye to the fascist/terrorist practitioners of Islam, but I'll try to be nice.) Go back over the debate mentally. Can you remember any conservative questions that were represented in a good light? Maybe the anger should be directed at the moderator (CNN) for only picking conservative questions from people who looked like hicks or nutjobs.

    Now like most people, I didn't watch the debate. I had better things to do than watch a pack of self-serving liars out-surrender each other in Iraq (especially when some of them are currently senators who don't have the stones to just cut the funding). So I didn't see the question posed by Mr. Townsend. What was it that he did which gun owners in a bad light? Was it because he referred to his gun as his "baby"? If you applied Biden's logic (that the gun owner actually *gasp* liked his gun, instead of owning it reluctantly), that would disqualify all gun enthusiasts from owning guns, including almost everyone here. Heck, what if I referred to my Jaguar as my "baby". Would Biden think I'm wrong in the head too? Or was it because Mr. Townsend bought the gun under a bad ban?

    To help clarify, Biden then said: "I think he just made an admission against self-interest. I don't know that he is mentally qualified to own that gun." Why? Because he likes owning the gun. Applied universally, only the (government's) police and security teams hired to protect such elitists as Biden and other gun-hating liberals would be able to own a gun.

    Why you can't see past the words, down to the actions and agendas of these people is beyond me. How do you do it? Deliberate blindness?

    satelie66 asked how far you would "bend over to support any dem". I can't remember, did you chastise the rest of us over our comments when (Muslim) Keith Ellison was elected? Did you make the usual comparisons to when (Catholic) JFK was running for president? I only bring that up because Ellison recently likened Bush to Hitler.

    Personally, I think all modern liberal (sorry- I meant progressive) politicians must be nuts. Nuts to think nobody can see through them. Actually, they do realize some people can, and they realize that some of them have radio shows. Which is why they're trying to bring back the Fairness Doctrine.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
General Discussion Nancy Pelosi says we are nazis.... Aug 6, 2009
General Discussion Nancy Pelosi... May 14, 2009
General Discussion Nancy Pelosi is lying!!!! May 7, 2009
General Discussion Nancy is going to Syria! Apr 3, 2007
General Discussion NANCY'S MRI(GHD's daughter) was NORMAL!!! Jul 29, 2004

Share This Page