Nifong Disbarred

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Pistolenschutze, Jun 17, 2007.

  1. It would seem that, sometimes at least, justice does prevail. A travesty of justice and a blatant abuse of prosecutorial power was committed by Nifong in this case, the kind of personal abuse of authority one would expect to have seen not in the United States, but in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia. It is good to see a wrong righted and the true guilty parties punished. Yet, I must ask: What might have happened had the falsely accused in this case not come from wealthy families with the wherewithall to defend themselves against the "system," but instead from average families unable to afford the cost of highly qualified attorneys and investigators? That thought frightens me.

    FOX NEWS

    Mike Nifong Disbarred Over Ethics Violations in Duke Lacrosse Case

    Sunday, June 17, 2007
    RALEIGH, N.C. —

    District Attorney Mike Nifong was disbarred Saturday for his "selfish" rape prosecution of three Duke University lacrosse players — a politically motivated act, his judges said, that he inexplicably allowed to fester for months after it was clear the defendants were innocent.

    "This matter has been a fiasco. There's no doubt about it," said F. Lane Williamson, the chairman of the three-member disciplinary committee that stripped the veteran prosecutor of his state law license.

    Even Nifong and his attorneys supported the decision, though the veteran prosecutor refused to admit to the end that no crime occurred at a March 2006 lacrosse team party.

    • Click Here to View the Ethics Complaint Against Nifong

    The committee said Nifong manipulated the investigation to boost his chances of winning his first election for Durham County district attorney. In doing so, he committed "a clear case of intentional prosecutorial misconduct" that involved "dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation."

    Williamson specifically cited Nifong's comments in the early days of the case, which included a confident proclamation at a candidate forum that he wouldn't allow Durham to become known for "a bunch of lacrosse players from Duke raping a black girl." He also called the lacrosse team "a bunch of hooligans" at one point.

    Appointed district attorney in 2005, Nifong was in a tight race for the office when a stripper told police she was raped at the party.

    "At the time he was facing a primary, and yes, he was politically naive," Williamson said. "But we can draw no other conclusion that those initial statements he made were to further his political ambitions."

    During the ethics trial, Nifong acknowledged he knew there was no DNA evidence connecting Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty to the 28-year-old accuser when he indicted them on charges of rape, sexual offense and kidnapping. Nifong later charged Dave Evans with the same crimes. But months later, state prosecutors concluded the three players were "innocent" — a fact Williamson hammered home on Saturday.

    "We acknowledge the actual innocence of the defendants, and there's nothing here that has done anything but support that assertion," Williamson said.

    Williamson said it appeared that throughout his investigation, Nifong was looking for any evidence to link a lacrosse player to the accuser's story in order to support his initial comments that he was sure an attack occurred.

    "He's already out there," Williamson said. "He's way out there by then. He looks foolish if he does not go forward."

    One of the most serious ethics violations Nifong was found to have committed involved his failure to turn over DNA test results that identified genetic material from several men — but no members of the lacrosse team — in the accuser's underwear and body.

    In court documents and hearings in May, June and September, Nifong told two different judges that he had no more evidence that could be considered helpful to the defense. Nifong said he didn't realize the defense hadn't been given all the DNA test results until December — a suggestion Williamson found laughable.

    "He knew. He admits he knew," Williamson said during Nifong attorney Dudley Witt's closing argument. "How could he not know if he had read it? How could he not know?"

    Witt admitted his client made "multiple, egregious mistakes." He insisted none were made intentionally, but struggled to offer another explanation.

    "It didn't click," Witt said as he tried to explain away one of Nifong's errors. "His mind is just his mind. That's the way it works. It just didn't click."

    Along with accusing Nifong of withholding the DNA evidence and making misleading and inflammatory comments about the three athletes, the North Carolina State Bar said he lied to both the court and bar investigators. The committee found Nifong broke the state's rules of professional conduct more than two dozen times.

    "I would say there are no winners in this scenario," said Kevin Finnerty, Collin's father. "With that said, I think there's closure. I think it's appropriate and I think it's justice.

    "I think he brought it on himself."

    The players' defense attorneys have pledged to seek criminal contempt charges next week in Durham from a judge who has already reminded Nifong he has the authority to impose punishment. They suggested the calls for a federal civil rights investigation were not out of line.

    "I don't think any of us are done with Mr. Nifong yet," said Jim Cooney, Seligmann's attorney.

    Nifong declined to comment Saturday while quietly slipping out of the courthouse through a side door, but his attorney had announced earlier — after the committee concluded he broke the rules — that Nifong considered disbarment an appropriate punishment. Nifong had already pledged to resign his $110,000-a-year job as district attorney, and he will not appeal.

    "He hopes this helps restore some of the confidence in the criminal justice system of North Carolina," said his attorney David Freedman. "On one hand, it's very devastating. On the other hand, he's been going through this process for a long time, so you always have some semblance of relief when the process is over with regardless of the outcome."

    That was perhaps never more apparent than Friday, when Williamson asked Nifong directly if he still believed the accuser was attacked. After pausing for several seconds, Nifong said that while he could not say whether she was sexually assaulted, "something happened to make everybody leave that scene very quickly."

    The comment enraged the players' defense attorneys, and sent the mother of one player into the hallway outside the courtroom in tears. Williamson took special care Saturday to note that even though Nifong had apologized to the players and volunteered to give up his law license, he remains unable to agree that no lacrosse player committed a crime.

    "In the face of a declaration of innocence by the attorney general of North Carolina, it appears the defendant still believes the facts to be one way and the world now knows that is not the case," Williamson said.
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 17, 2007
  2. buffalo jump

    buffalo jump New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2004
    Messages:
    495
    Location:
    pensacola, fl. , escambia county
    GREAT...............
  3. tom vito

    tom vito New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Messages:
    69
    We would have paid to keep them in jail for 20 years, and then pay a settlement because they learned enough about law, while being imprisoned that they would be set free.
  4. Bruce FLinch

    Bruce FLinch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Bay Point, Kali..aka Gun Point
    I think Nifong & that lying stripper ought to share a cell. :mad:
  5. clmanges

    clmanges New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    203
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    YESSS!!!
    But as to the question . . . without lots of expensive legal help, anyone else would have been screwed.
    We may yet have the pleasure of seeing Nifong go to jail, where he'd find out what a real rape case is all about.
  6. 300 H&H

    300 H&H Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,855
    Location:
    Iowa
    Pitolen, How about a judge that sued a cleaner of his pants for 54 million $ because he was not "satified" how scary of a thought is that? I for one think he should be disbarred as well for beating up on what I think was an honorable sign saying "satisfaction guarnteed". Problem is the all powerful judge was not and will not be satisfied, so how did he ever become a judge???? Kirk
  7. I certainly don't disagree with your assessment, Kirk. I heard about that case, and the so-called "judge" who filed such an absurd lawsuit is likely to find himself a laughingstock before it's all over. I hope the hardworking people he sued turn around and sue him for filing a frivious lawsuit.
  8. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,857
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    I think its pitiful that the judge who received the case didn't dismiss it by bench order and fine counsel that filed it. I would have back in my day!!!!
  9. What's so hard to understand for me, Marlin, is why an individual, trained in the law, would file such an egregious rediculous lawsuit in the first place. He must know full well that even were he to get a local judge to side with him (the good ol' boys syndrome), he would lose on appeal.

Share This Page