North American Union?!

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by berto64, Jun 23, 2006.

  1. berto64

    berto64 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2001
    Messages:
    7,491
    Location:
    Owyhee County, Idaho
    What do you folks think?


    Immigration
    North American Union to Replace USA?

    by Jerome R. Corsi
    Posted May 19, 2006

    http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965


    President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

    Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

    President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

    The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

    At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

    What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

    In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

    To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

    The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

    The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

    The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

    Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

    Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

    Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.
    __________________
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2006
  2. Bernie109

    Bernie109 Former Guest

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    274
    Location:
    Central CA
    Back in 94, Pat Roberson wrote a book titled "The New World Order".
    In a nutshell, he accuses the Dems & GOP of only pretending to be opponents but are actually working together with the goal of a one world order. He goes even farther to accuse the Bush Family and Dick Cheny of being high ranking officials in the CFR and of being believers in the one world agenda. Sounds like Pat was right back then. Ironically, he is now firmly in the Bush camp and is ignoring every warning he made in his book.
  3. southernshooter

    southernshooter New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,956
    Location:
    Deep South Mississippi
    That don't surprise me BERTO
  4. Leander H. McNelley

    Leander H. McNelley New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    Texas
    It is amazing the Sheeple are more concerned with a flag burning amendment, than each and every other amendment of the Constitution being made void by the North American Partnership.
  5. HiPowerKid

    HiPowerKid New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Messages:
    202
    Location:
    NW FL
    As Randy Savage used to say "O-O-o-o-o Yeaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!"

    Well the North American Union is another stepping stone to the Free Trade Area of the Americas which was due to be voted on this past January. For information on FTAA (which is basically a group of regional governments from Alaska and Canada down to the tip of South America) go to http://www.stoptheftaa.org/default.html. If FTAA is passed, you can just about kiss American sovereignty goodbye. Our sovereignty is already slipping out of our grasp if the sheeple don't awake and scream NO.

    If you think illegal immigration is bad now, wait till the North American Union and the FTAA are legitimized and fully in place. Remember, President Bush stated that he wanted "any willing employee to be matched up with any willing employer." And he was talking about anybody from any continent going wherever to work for any willing employer. You thinking about trudging down to South America anytime soon? Think how many want to come here unabated and further depress wages.

    However, enough concerned citizens put up enough resistance to it for Congress to delay the vote. Instead, Congress had to settle for C.A.F.T.A. (Central America Free Trade Agreement), which groups all those countries together, EXCEPT FOR CUBA. When all of these regional governments are organized, it will bemuch easier to control a group of regional governments rather than a bunch of individual countries.

    I hope more freedom-loving Americans will get on the bandwagon, get active in politics, even if it is distasteful and get these clowns in Washington and in our local areas to wake up and listen to the electorate and quit lining their pockets and the pockets of the United Nations with our tax dollars.

    Did you hear about Indiana selling their highways to a foreign country and putting a toll booth on it? Texas is doing the same thing in their state with Spain. Google that crap and find out how quickly we're not only selling America, BUT GIVING IT AWAY!!!!!!!!!::mad: :mad:
  6. billt

    billt Former Guest

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    Glendale, Arizona
    This will wind up to be a lot of nothing just like NAFTA was. I remember the 1992 elections with Perot and all his pie charts and bull$h!t claiming if NAFTA was passed we would hear this "giant sucking sound", as all the jobs went south. It turned out that all that sucked was Perot himself. The fact is after over 10 years with NAFTA in place for every 5 companies that have moved to Mexico, 3 have either moved back or gone broke. Mexico isn't all that it was cracked up to be. What are you going to do with a bunch of stupid, uneducated people who don't speak english, and don't show up for work half of the time? Companies who are producing products there are having constant, never ending quality and absentee issues. This "North American Union" will fare no better. They have been carrying on about this "New World Order" for almost 2 decades with nothing worth a damn happening. It will never materialize either. If anything look for us to be less involved with unionizing with foreign lands. Most hate our guts, which is just fine. The United Nations is losing more and more creditability every single day with it's mishandling of everything they touch. Kofi Annan is about the most corrupt, worthless Secretary General that useless organization has ever had. All this talk about "unionizing" with other stinkhole countries is just that, worthless talk. Bill T.
  7. Leander H. McNelley

    Leander H. McNelley New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    Texas
    BillT.

    It already has. If you go to the Federal Government Web Site, www.spp.gov you will find a great deal of information about "trilateral network of law enforcement to guard the officers and judges" of this North American Partnership, for a reason.

    The Trans Texas Corridor, which was initiated by George Bush when he was Governor of Texas in 1998, by bypassing the Congress to appoint a "Texas Border Commerce Coordinator", (who is the Texas Secretary of State) will link up in Kansas City's "Smart Port" and then carry on further across America into Canada.

    The web site has signed documents between all three countries entitled "Memorandums of Understandings" and "Framework" documents signed by the Ambassadors of all three Nations, complete with each Nations flag affixed above the signatures. You also have Dept. of Commerce Heads, and the Dept. of Transportation Agency heads of each Nation, with their signatures on these related documents.

    Already the Texas Comptrollor is sending out "ID" numbers for services, to be assigned to existing Texas businesses, generated by this Unconstitutional Agency, and your "ID" number will link up to the shipping "corridor".

    Mexican trucks will be allowed to travel from Mexico, with a microchip "Trusted Traveller" programed into the truck, thus no search at the border by U.S. Customs. The truck will be allowed to enter the Trans Texas Corridor, and travel all the way to Kansas City Mo. previous to it ever being searched. At that point, it will be searched by MEXICAN personnel in Kansas City, since the port will be MEXICAN SOIL, much like an Embassy.

    There is way more to this than you think. The U.S. Constitution requires a majority Senate approval previous to a treaty being "made" by a President.
    The Bush Administration has "made" a treaty without a single vote, much less majority vote in the Senate.

    So keep in mind, there is more to this than everyone knows.
  8. billt

    billt Former Guest

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Location:
    Glendale, Arizona
    About the last thing Bush, or any other President, Republican or Democrat is going to do at this point in time, is to cut down on border security. That wouldn't be like shooting themselves in the foot, it would be like shooting themselves in the head! I believe all this stuff is out there on the internet. The bulk of it is the work of a lot of the Kool-Aid drinkers and other far left liberal whack jobs that think we should be in bed with everybody. It won't cut it with the bulk of the American people who are about ready to blow over this illeagle immigration deal. Doing anything of this sort with anyone south of the border will amount to us giving and them receiving. Americans have had enough of that kind of silly crap. We always wind up taking it up the a$$ every time. Isolationism is starting to sound pretty good right about now. Screw these "people"! Bill T.
  9. Leander H. McNelley

    Leander H. McNelley New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    45
    Location:
    Texas
    I understand BillT, that people are fed up. That is the intent of the entire "Globalism" issue.

    You get enough left wing communists in the Democrat leadership, wanting to strip every actual Constitutional Right we have, so every time a halfway conservative person hears "Democrat" they hear "Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, John Kerry gun grab socialism, and then you put in enough Right-Wing Police State nut balls who want to deliver a warrant with a Tank crashing through your front door, or who just can't wait to go to some Hurricane site, all the way from California to New Orleans, just to confiscate guns from seventy year old ladies in their own home, and pretty soon, you have a voter turn out of around three percent of the country.

    Then throw in some child molestors in the Congress, and some idiotic cover up of it, and then the three percent voting population will vote for Democrat majority, then they will go in for a while and pass some stupid assed law like granting NEA money to artists to do some hateful action and call it art, and pass stupid, useless laws like the Brady Bill, and then the three percent of voters will come out in four years, and vote in the right wing extremists nut balls again.

    Finally, when only about zero percent turn out to vote, that will give them the leeway to expand such things as the North American Partnership into a European Union type of thing.

    And we allow it. Consider Iraq. Fifty percent of the populace came out to vote, and we get three. We go to the polls, in safety, they get killed on the way to, and from the polls, but they turned out in numbers of fifty percent.

    If we wind up with a One World Government/North American Union/EU type situation here, it will be due to the Republican, and Democrat parties both allowing their leadership, to pretend the Constitution does not even exist.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum North American Partnership Agreement Sep 29, 2006
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Gore to North Korea for Reporter Negotiations? Jun 9, 2009
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Take a look at 'Operation Northwoods'. Nov 20, 2004
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum A letter from Ollie North to John Kerry! Sep 14, 2004
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum School Is Teaching That Americans Don’t Have the Right to Bear Arms Apr 9, 2013