Obama Healthcare & Being Anti-Gun

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by hogger129, Feb 25, 2010.

  1. hogger129

    hogger129 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    4,151
    I am just wondering what exactly in Obama's proposed health care legislation is anti-gun? I really just want to know for myself. I do not want his legislation to pass even if it's just "free" health care - because it would just be another burden on the taxpayer - but I especially don't want it to pass if it is anti-gun in any way. I want to tell other people about it too. Could somebody be more specific and point it out to me? Thanks.
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2010
  2. Eddie N

    Eddie N New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,192
    Location:
    Colorado
    It's classified super-super secret. Not even he knows.:rolleyes:
  3. wpage

    wpage Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,482
    They should option this to offer it to people who have no insurance.
  4. bcj1755

    bcj1755 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,357
    Location:
    A wretched hive of scum and villiany
    It's not the fact that it's openly anti-gun, per se. Its' the fact that some of the wording can be twisted around by the gov't to restrict people's ownership of firearms. Such as the stipulation that everyone MUST have gov't approved insurance under penalty of fine levied by the IRS (i.e., a tax) or prison, but that the gov't run medicare-type program can be denied to someone who lives a "dangerous lifestyle." And who decides what a "dangerous" lifestyle is? Kathrine Seblius, that's who. And remember, she's very anti-gun. There's also the part that would allow ANY gov't agency to go trolling through your medical records at any time and without your permission. That includes ATF. Nevada Harry even admitted that there was the possibility for trampling on people's 2nd Amendment rights in the Senate bill, so he had some "firearms protection" lines added as a sop to try and get support for it. But the main thing is that this bill will give the feds invasive control over the very minutae of our lives, and once they have that kind of control, they WILL want more.

    Just say NO to AdolfCare.
  5. red14

    red14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,960
    Location:
    N FLA
    ""the main thing is that this bill will give the feds invasive control over the very minutae of our lives, and once they have that kind of control, they WILL want more.

    some of the wording can be twisted around by the gov't to restrict people's ownership of firearms""

    These two sentences sum up your fears. It is all about CONTROL!
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Will obama catch on ? Feb 28, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Cornyn-Graham to introduce law codifying Obama directive Jan 9, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Obama Will Sign UN Gun Treaty While Congress Is On Vacation Aug 14, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Obama prepping to ban importation of Ammo, mags,accessories Apr 25, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum After Senate setback, Obama quietly moving forward with gun regulation Apr 23, 2013

Share This Page