Obozo gutted welfare reform

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by 45nut, Jul 13, 2012.

  1. 45nut

    45nut Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    3,462
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/partisan-disgrace-obama-admin-quietly-rewrites-welfare-reform-law/

    The National Review's take as well

    In move that went largely “unnoticed” by the mainstream media, the Obama administration on Thursday released an “official policy directive” that essentially rewrites the landmark welfare reform law of 1996, the Washington Examiner’s Byron York reports.

    “The directive,” York explains, “allows the Department of Health and Human Services to waive the work requirement at the heart of welfare reform.”

    An “Information Memorandum” released by the Department of Health and Human Services’ states:

    [The] HHS has authority to waive compliance with this 402 requirement and authorize a state to test approaches and methods other than those set forth in section 407, including definitions of work activities and engagement, specified limitations, verification procedures, and the calculation of participation rates.

    The memo, as the Daily Caller’s Caroline May notes, argues that by waiving the so-called “work requirements,” the feds are encouraging “states to consider new, more effective ways to meet the goals of TANF, particularly helping parents successfully prepare for, find, and retain employment.”

    Of course, the decision is seen by many on the right as a weakening, maybe even a violation, of the 1996 reform law.

    The law, “originally vetoed but later signed into law by President Bill Clinton, is widely viewed as the most successful policy initiative in a generation. Under it, the growth in welfare rolls was reversed and millions of people moved from welfare to work,” York writes.


    “Despite its success, however, many liberals remain opposed to reform. For example, in the years immediately after passage of the law, Barack Obama himself pledged to do all he could to undo it,” he adds.

    Well, it looks like he’s done it.

    The Obama administration’s decision is “the end of welfare reform as we know it,” said Robert Rector, a welfare policy expert at the Heritage Foundation.

    “President Obama just tore up a basic foundation of the welfare contract,” said Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Jordan.

    “Today’s action is also a blatant violation of the law. After immigration, education, marriage, and religious conscience protections, we can now add welfare reform to the list of laws President Obama refuses to follow,” he adds.

    House Speaker John Boehner released a statement criticizing the president.

    “By gutting the work requirements in President Clinton’s signature welfare reform law, President Obama is admitting his economic policies have failed,” Boehner wrote.


    He continues:

    While President Clinton worked with Congress in a bipartisan way on welfare reform and economic opportunity, President Obama has routinely ignored Republican proposals, rejected House-passed jobs bills, and imposed an agenda that’s helped keep the unemployment rate above eight percent for 41 months.

    Welfare reform was an historic, bipartisan success — this move by the Obama administration is a partisan disgrace.

    Meanwhile, as the president’s campaign continues to chase after thoroughly debunked Bain Capital narratives, Mitt Romney has already come out and hit the White House for its welfare rewrite.

    “President Obama now wants to strip the established work requirements from welfare,” Romney said.


    “The success of bipartisan welfare reform, passed under President Clinton, has rested on the obligation of work. The president’s action is completely misdirected. Work is a dignified endeavor, and the linkage of work and welfare is essential to prevent welfare from becoming a way of life,” he added.




    The comments section, naturally, is full of good lines, but, not all are TFF friendly. Go see for yourself.

    Peace
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2012
  2. raven818

    raven818 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    7,058
    Location:
    Jax, Fl.
    I listened to a person talking about this today. Why look for work? He's making it easier and easier to receive birth to death hand-outs. He's got his people creating TV ad's to get more and more folks to sign up for food stamps. If he gets reelected his, now up to 2 trillion dollar, obozo care will be permanent.

    Fifty cents of every dollar we make goes to paying off our national debt. And, the true costs of his socialist agenda has yet to be discovered.

    Bottom line, once a government program is put into place, it is all but impossible to undo it.

    I'm trying very hard to keep a positive attitude regarding Americas future, it's difficult to maintain.
  3. zkovach

    zkovach Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,011
    Location:
    Michigan
    If u choose not to vote this will get worse!!! Please vote accordingly!!!
  4. raven818

    raven818 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    7,058
    Location:
    Jax, Fl.
    Anybody who doesn't vote deserves everything they get.
  5. skullfr

    skullfr New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    Messages:
    902
    Location:
    Beaumont,Texas
    watch the buttmonkey try something sneakyat elections.At least hitler did a better smoke job.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Obozocare Number Sends Folks To Sex Hotline Apr 1, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Where Obozo wants us to be ...and headed that way ! Jan 4, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Being charged for obozocare... Jan 4, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr 3 days, 354 people - Obozocare Oct 31, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Want to see what Obozo care will cost you without signing up? Look at this! Oct 19, 2013

Share This Page