Pawlenty's Proposal

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by pinecone70, Nov 6, 2009.

  1. pinecone70

    pinecone70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,729
    Location:
    Minnesota Gal!
    ST. PAUL- Governor Tim Pawlenty might have just chosen his swan song.

    "We need to change the way we budget in Minnesota from what we want to spend to what we have brought in the door," Pawlenty said today.

    The Governor proposed a state constitutional amendment that would cap state spending, based solely on revenues it brings in.

    "It is a budget based on what is in the checkbook rather than what we hope might be in the checkbook in the future," Pawlenty said.

    It is called the spending accountability amendment.

    If it had been on the books, on average the state would have spend 900 million dollars less in each two year budget cycle since 1960, according to Pawlenty.

    Obviously, Senate democrats are more than skeptical.

    "At first blush it does seem odd that on his way out the door, with a seven million dollar deficit, he recommends something he never proposed to the legislature," Senate Majority Leader Larry Pogemiller said.

    If the amendment did make it out of the Capitol and on the ballot, history would suggest, it would pass.

    Senate tax committee chairman Tom Bakk points out that since 1980, of the 18 constitutional amendments that went to the ballot, 17 passed.

    "If we are going to put this on the ballot we need to take it seriously because it has a good chance to pass," Bakk said.

    But it's a long way from passing at this point because it's just a proposal and a couple of graphs and charts.

    Brought to us by a Governor, who would like to make a drastic change, before he sets sail.

    (Copyright 2009 by KARE. All Rights Reserved.)
  2. red14

    red14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,962
    Location:
    N FLA
    What is your opinion on this Pinecone? You know more about this, being a resident. What say you?
  3. pinecone70

    pinecone70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,729
    Location:
    Minnesota Gal!
    I'm not sure what to think yet, it was new to me this morning. It will shake things up a bit.
  4. Trouble 45-70

    Trouble 45-70 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,703
    Location:
    NE Ar. W. of Black River
    They don't need that amendment, there are still checks in the check book.
  5. Double D

    Double D Administrator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    11,105
    Location:
    North Florida
    And if the checks run out they will just get more....
  6. Bobitis

    Bobitis Guest

    We had a similar initiative here this week.
    It got laughed off the cliff.:(

    Anyone got any spare change?
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Pawlenty's Political Metaphor Feb 19, 2010
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Gun ban for medical pot users dropped from Illinois proposal Apr 18, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Biden Video - He Admits that His Proposals are Useless at Preventing Crime Feb 13, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr A Modest Proposal Dec 24, 2008

Share This Page