Political Islam 1

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by Marlin T, Aug 8, 2009.

  1. Marlin T

    Marlin T Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,888
    Location:
    New Mexico
    The Study of Political Islam By: Jamie Glazov
    FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, February 05, 2007



    Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI). CSPI’s goal is to teach the doctrine of political Islam through its books and it has produced a series on its focus. Mr. Warner did not write the CSPI series, but he acts as the agent for a group of scholars who are the authors

    FP: Bill Warner, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

    Warner: Thank you Jamie for this opportunity.

    FP: Tell us a bit aboutthe Center for the Study of Political Islam.

    Warner: The Center for the Study of Political Islam is a group of scholars who are devoted to the scientific study of the foundational texts of Islam—Koran, Sira (life of Mohammed) and Hadith (traditions of Mohammed). There are two areas to study in Islam, its doctrine and history, or as CSPI sees it—the theory and its results. We study the history to see the practical or experimental results of the doctrine.

    CSPI seems to be the first group to use statistics to study the doctrine. Previous scientific studies of the Koran are primarily devoted to Arabic language studies.

    Our first principle is that Koran, Sira and Hadith must be taken as a whole. We call them the Islamic Trilogy to emphasize the unity of the texts.

    Our major intellectual breakthrough is to see that dualism is the foundation and key to understanding Islam. Everything about Islam comes in twos starting with its foundational declaration: (1) there is no god but Allah and (2) Mohammed is His prophet. Therefore, Islam is Allah (Koran) and the Sunna (words and deeds of Mohammed found in the Sira and Hadith).

    Endless ink has been wasted on trying to answer the question of what is Islam? Is Islam the religion of peace? Or is the true Islam a radical ideology? Is a moderate Muslim the real Muslim?

    This reminds a scientist of the old arguments about light. Is light a particle or is light a wave? The arguments went back and forth. Quantum mechanics gave us the answer. Light is dualistic; it is both a particle and a wave. It depends upon the circumstances as to which quality manifests. Islam functions in the same manner.

    Our first clue about the dualism is in the Koran, which is actually two books, the Koran of Mecca (early) and the Koran of Medina (later). The insight into the logic of the Koran comes from the large numbers of contradictions in it. On the surface, Islam resolves these contradictions by resorting to “abrogation”. This means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But in fact, since the Koran is considered by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, both verses are sacred and true. The later verse is “better,” but the earlier verse cannot be wrong since Allah is perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are “right.” Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic. The circumstances govern which verse is used.

    For example:

    (Koran of Mecca) 73:10: Listen to what they [unbelievers] say with patience, and leave them with dignity.

    From tolerance we move to the ultimate intolerance, not even the Lord of the Universe can stand the unbelievers:


    (Koran of Medina) 8:12: Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the unbelievers’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”

    All of Western logic is based upon the law of contradiction—if two things contradict, then at least one of them is false. But Islamic logic is dualistic; two things can contradict each other and both are true.

    No dualistic system may be measured by one answer. This is the reason that the arguments about what constitutes the “real” Islam go on and on and are never resolved. A single right answer does not exist.

    Dualistic systems can only be measured by statistics. It is futile to argue one side of the dualism is true. As an analogy, quantum mechanics always gives a statistical answer to all questions.

    For an example of using statistics, look at the question: what is the real jihad, the jihad of inner, spiritual struggle or the jihad of war? Let’s turn to Bukhari (the Hadith) for the answer, as he repeatedly speaks of jihad. In Bukhari 97% of the jihad references are about war and 3% are about the inner struggle. So the statistical answer is that jihad is 97% war and 3% inner struggle. Is jihad war? Yes—97%. Is jihad inner struggle? Yes—3%. So if you are writing an article, you can make a case for either. But in truth, almost every argument about Islam can be answered by: all of the above. Both sides of the duality are right.

    FP: Why, in your view, is there so much ignorance about the history and doctrine of political Islam in the West?

    Warner: First, let’s see how ignorant we are about the history of political Islam. How many Christians can tell you how Turkey or Egypt became Islamic? What happened to the Seven Churches of Asia mentioned in Paul’s letters? Find a Jew who can tell you the Jewish history of dhimmitude (second class citizens who serve Islam). What European knows that white women were the highest priced slaves in Mecca? Everyone knows how many Jews Hitler killed, but find an unbeliever who can tell you how many died in jihad over the last 1400 years.

    We are just as ignorant about the doctrine of Islam. An FBI agent gets two hours of training on Islam and most of that is how not to offend the imam. We are fighting in Iraq. Who utilizes the political, military doctrine of Islam to plan strategy? Who can find a single rabbi or minister who has read the Koran, Sira and Hadith? What governor, senator, congressmen or military leader displays a knowledge of the political doctrine of Islam? Try to find a course available in a college about Islamic political doctrine and ethics. Graduates are schooled in Islamic art, architecture, poetry, Sufism, and a glorious history that ignores the suffering of the innocent unbelievers. Graduates read comments about the Koran and Hadith, but do not read the actual doctrine.

    FP: So why this ignorance?

    Warner: Let’sstart at the beginning. When Islam burst out of Arabia into a decaying Byzantine world, the unbelievers recorded it as an Arabic invasion. Similarly, the invasion of Eastern Europe was by Turks; the invasion of Spain was by Moors. Our scholars were incapable of even naming the invaders.

    Mohammed killed every single intellectual or artist who opposed him. It was fear that drove the vast majority of the media not to reprint the Mohammed cartoons, not some imagined sensitivity. Fear is a fabulous basis for ignorance, but that is not enough to explain it all. What accounts for the almost psychotic aversion to knowledge about Islam? Beyond fear is the realization that political Islam is profoundly foreign to us.

    Let’s examine the ethical basis of our civilization. All of our politics and ethics are based upon a unitary ethic that is best formulated in the Golden Rule:

    Treat others as you would be treated.

    The basis of this rule is the recognition that at one level, we are all the same. We are not all equal. Any game of sports will show that we do not have equal abilities. But everyone wants to be treated as a human being. In particular, we all want to be equal under the law and be treated as social equals. On the basis of the Golden Rule—the equality of human beings—we have created democracy, ended slavery and treat women and men as political equals. So the Golden Rule is a unitary ethic. All people are to be treated the same. All religions have some version of the Golden Rule except Islam.

    FP: So how is Islam different in this context?

    Warner: The term “human being” has no meaning inside of Islam. There is no such thing as humanity, only the duality of the believer and unbeliever. Look at the ethical statements found in the Hadith. A Muslim should not lie, cheat, kill or steal from other Muslims. But a Muslim may lie, deceive or kill an unbeliever if it advances Islam.

    There is no such thing as a universal statement of ethics in Islam. Muslims are to be treated one way and unbelievers another way. The closest Islam comes to a universal statement of ethics is that the entire world must submit to Islam. After Mohammed became a prophet, he never treated an unbeliever the same as a Muslim. Islam denies the truth of the Golden Rule.

    By the way, this dualistic ethic is the basis for jihad. The ethical system sets up the unbeliever as less than human and therefore, it is easy to kill, harm or deceive the unbeliever.

    Now mind you, unbelievers have frequently failed at applying the Golden Rule, but we can be judged and condemned on its basis. We do fall short, but it is our ideal.

    There have been other dualistic cultures. The KKK comes to mind. But the KKK is a simplistic dualism. The KKK member hates all black people at all times; there is only one choice. This is very straightforward and easy to see.

    The dualism of Islam is more deceitful and offers two choices on how to treat the unbeliever. The unbeliever can be treated nicely, in the same way a farmer treats his cattle well. So Islam can be “nice”, but in no case is the unbeliever a “brother” or a friend. In fact, there are some 14 verses of the Koran that are emphatic—a Muslim is never a friend to the unbeliever. A Muslim may be “friendly,” but he is never an actual friend. And the degree to which a Muslim is actually a true friend is the degree to which he is not a Muslim, but a hypocrite.

    FP: You mentioned earlier how logic is another point of profound difference. Can you touch on that?

    Warner: To reiterate, all of science is based upon the law of contradiction. If two things contradict each other, then at least one of them has to be false. But inside of Islamic logic, two contradictory statements can both be true. Islam uses dualistic logic and we use unitary scientific logic.

    Since Islam has a dualistic logic and dualistic ethics, it is completely foreign to us. Muslims think differently from us and feel differently from us. So our aversion is based upon fear and a rejection of Islamic ethics and logic. This aversion causes us to avoid learning about Islam so we are ignorant and stay ignorant.

    Another part of the aversion is the realization that there is no compromise with dualistic ethics. There is no halfway place between unitary ethics and dualistic ethics. If you are in a business deal with someone who is a liar and a cheat, there is no way to avoid getting cheated. No matter how nice you are to a con man, he will take advantage of you. There is no compromise with dualistic ethics. In short, Islamic politics, ethics and logic cannot be part of our civilization. Islam does not assimilate, it dominates. There is never any “getting along” with Islam. Its demands never cease and the demands must be met on Islam’s terms: submission.

    The last reason for our aversion to the history of political Islam is our shame. Islam put over a million Europeans into slavery. Since Muslims can’t be enslaved, it was a white Christian who was the Turkish sultan’s sex slave. These are things that we do not want to face.

    Jews don’t want to acknowledge the history of political Islam, because they were dhimmis, second class citizens or semi-slaves, just like the Christians. Jews like to recall how they were advisors and physicians to powerful Muslims, but no matter what the Jew did or what position he held, he was still a dhimmi. There is no compromise between being equal and being a dhimmi

    Why should a Hindu want to recall the shame of slavery and the destruction of their temples and cities? After Hindu craftsmen built the Taj Mahal, the Muslim ruler had their right hands cut off so that they could not build anything as beautiful for anyone else. The practice of suttee, the widow throwing herself on the husband’s funeral pyre, came about as a response to the rape and brutality of the Islamic jihad as it sweep over ancient Hindustan.

    Blacks don’t want to face the fact that it was a Muslim who rounded up their ancestors in Africa to wholesale to the white slave trader. The Arab is the true master of the African. Blacks can’t accept the common bond they share with whites: that both Europeans and Africans were slaves under Islam. Blacks like to imagine Islam is their counterweight to white power, not that Islam has ruled them for 1400 years.

    Dualistic logic. Dualistic ethics. Fear. Shame. There is no compromise. These are the reasons we don’t want to know about Islam’s political history, doctrine or ethics.

    FP So is there such a thing as non-political Islam?


    Warner: Non-political Islam is religious Islam. Religious Islam is what a Muslim does to avoid Hell and go to Paradise. These are the Five Pillars—prayer, charity to Muslims, pilgrimage to Mecca, fasting and declaring Mohammed to be the final prophet.

    But the Trilogy is clear about the doctrine. At least 75% of the Sira (life of Mohammed) is about jihad. About 67% of the Koran written in Mecca is about the unbelievers, or politics. Of the Koran of Medina, 51% is devoted to the unbelievers. About 20% of Bukhari’s Hadith is about jihad and politics. Religion is the smallest part of Islamic foundational texts.

    Political Islam’s most famous duality is the division of the world into believers, dar al Islam, and unbelievers, dar al harb. The largest part of the Trilogy relates to treatment of the unbelievers, kafirs. Even Hell is political. There are 146 references to Hell in the Koran. Only 6% of those in Hell are there for moral failings—murder, theft, etc. The other 94% of the reasons for being in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Mohammed, a political crime. Hence, Islamic Hell is a political prison for those who speak against Islam.

    Mohammed preached his religion for 13 years and garnered only 150 followers. But when he turned to politics and war, in 10 years time he became the first ruler of Arabia by averaging an event of violence every 7 weeks for 9 years. His success did not come as a religious leader, but as a political leader.

    In short, political Islam defines how the unbelievers are to be dealt with and treated.

    FP: Can you touch briefly on the history of political Islam?


    Warner: The history of political Islam starts with Mohammed’s immigration to Medina. From that point on, Islam’s appeal to the world has always had the dualistic option of joining a glorious religion or being the subject of political pressure and violence. After the immigration to Medina, Islam became violent when persuasion failed. Jihad entered the world.

    After Mohammed’s death, Abu Bakr, the second caliph, settled the theological arguments of those who wished to leave Islam with the political action of death by the sword. The jihad of Umar (the second caliph, a pope-king) exploded into the world of the unbelievers. Jihad destroyed a Christian Middle East and a Christian North Africa. Soon it was the fate of the Persian Zoroastrian and the Hindu to be the victims of jihad. The history of political Islam is the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt, Turkey and North Africa. Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam, North Africa was the southern part of Europe (part of the Roman Empire). Around 60 million Christians were slaughtered during the jihadic conquest.

    Half of the glorious Hindu civilization was annihilated and 80 million Hindus killed.

    The first Western Buddhists were the Greeks descended from Alexander the Great’s army in what is now Afghanistan. Jihad destroyed all of Buddhism along the silk route. About 10 million Buddhists died. The conquest of Buddhism is the practical result of pacifism.

    Zoarasterianism was eliminated from Persia.

    The Jews became permanent dhimmis throughout Islam.

    In Africa over 120 million Christians and animists have died over the last 1400 years of jihad.

    Approximately 270 million nonbelievers died over the last 1400 years for the glory of political Islam. These are the Tears of Jihad which are not taught in any school.


    FP: How have our intellectuals responded to Islam?


    Warner: The basis of all the unbeliever’s thought has collapsed in the face of Islamic political thought, ethics and logic. We have already mentioned how our first intellectuals could not even name the invaders as Muslims. We have no method of analysis of Islam. We can’t agree on what Islam is and have no knowledge about our suffering as the victims of a 1400-year jihad.

    Look at how Christians, Jews, blacks, intellectuals and artists have dealt with Islamic doctrine and history. In every case their primary ideas fail.

    Christians believe that “love conquers all.” Well, love does not conquer Islam. Christians have a difficult time seeing Islam as a political doctrine, not a religion. The sectarian nature of Christian thought means that the average non-Orthodox Christian has no knowledge or sympathy about the Orthodox Christian’s suffering.

    Jews have a theology that posits a unique relationship between Jews and the creator-god of the universe. But Islam sees the Jews as apes who corrupted the Old Testament. Jews see no connection between Islam’s political doctrine and Israel.

    Black intellectuals have based their ideas on the slave/victim status and how wrong it was for white Christians to make them slaves. Islam has never acknowledged any of the pain and suffering it has caused in Africa with its 1400-year-old slave trade. But blacks make no attempt to get an apology from Muslims and are silent in the presence of Islam. Why? Is it because Arabs are their masters?

    Multiculturalism is bankrupt against Islam’s demand for every civilization to submit. The culture of tolerance collapses in the face of the sacred intolerance of dualistic ethics. Intellectuals respond by ignoring the failure.

    Our intellectuals and artists have been abused for 1400 years. Indeed, the psychology of our intellectuals is exactly like the psychology of the abused wife, the sexually abused child or rape victim. Look at the parallels between the response of abuse victims and our intellectuals. See how violence has caused denial.

    The victims deny that the abuse took place: Our media never reports the majority of jihad around the world. Our intellectuals don’t talk about how all of the violence is connected to a political doctrine.

    The abuser uses fear to control the victim: What was the reason that newspapers would not publish the Mohammed cartoon? Salman Rushdie still has a death sentence for his novel. What “cutting edge” artist creates any artistic statement about Islam? Fear rules our intellectuals and artists.

    The victims find ways to blame themselves: We are to blame for the attacks on September 11, 2001. If we try harder Muslims will act nicer. We have to accommodate their needs.

    The victim is humiliated: White people will not talk about how their ancestors were enslaved by Islam. No one wants to claim the victims of jihad. Why won’t we claim the suffering of our ancestors? Why don’t we cry about the loss of cultures and peoples? We are too ashamed to care.

    The victim feels helpless: “What are we going to do?” “We can’t kill 1.3 billion people.” No one has any understanding or optimism. No one has an idea of what to try. The only plan is to “be nicer.”

    The victim turns the anger inward: What is the most divisive issue in today’s politics? Iraq. And what is Iraq really about? Political Islam. The Web has a video about how the CIA and Bush planned and executed September 11. Cultural self-loathing is the watchword of our intellectuals and artists.

    We hate ourselves because we are mentally molested and abused. Our intellectuals and artists have responded to the abuse of jihad just as a sexually abused child or a rape victim would respond. We are quite intellectually ill and are failing at our job of clear thinking. We can’t look at our denial.

    FP: So summarize for us why it is so crucial for us to learn the doctrine of political Islam.


    Warner: Political Islam has annihilated every culture it has invaded or immigrated to. The total time for annihilation takes centuries, but once Islam is ascendant it never fails. The host culture disappears and becomes extinct.

    We must learn the doctrine of political Islam to survive. The doctrine is very clear that all forms of force and persuasion may and must be used to conquer us. Islam is a self-declared enemy of all unbelievers. The brilliant Chinese philosopher of war, Sun Tsu, had the dictum—know the enemy. We must know the doctrine of our enemy or be annihilated.

    Or put another way: if we do not learn the doctrine of political Islam, our civilization will be annihilated just as Egypt’s Coptic civilization was annihilated.

    Since unbelievers must know the doctrine of political Islam to survive, CSPI has written all of its books in simple English. Our books are scholarly, but easy to read. As an example, anyone who can read a newspaper can pick up A Simple Koran and read and understand it. It is not “dumbed down” and contains every single word of the original.

    Not only is the language simple, but logic has been used to sort and categorize. Context and chronology have been restored. The result is a Koran that is an epic story ending in triumph over all enemies of Allah. All of our books and philosophy may be found at our center's website.

    Islam declares that we are the enemies of Allah. If we do not learn the political doctrine of Islam we will end up just like the first victims of Islam—the tolerant, polytheist Arabs of Saudi Arabia who became the Wahabbis (a very strict branch of Islam) of today, the most intolerant culture on the face of the earth.

    FP: Bill Warner, thank you for joining us today.

    Warner: Jamie, thank you for your kindness and efforts.

    Click Here to support Frontpagemag.com.
    http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=297
  2. Rocket J Squirl

    Rocket J Squirl New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    418
    I say, Islam be damned, come on down to our hood

    Free trips to see Allah, and a very fast ticket to 72 virgins
  3. carver

    carver Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    16,306
    Location:
    DAV, Deep in the Pineywoods of East Texas, just we
    And yet again, I ask, How many here have even read the Quran? It is not the people, but the religion, that will destroy us in the end. If you are not a beliver, then you must convert, or die! No exceptions! This is not a religion of peace! It is a religion of war, politics, and control of all Nations, and peoples! And, it is knocking at our door.
  4. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,179
    Location:
    Louisiana
    I read half of this last night and got tired. I really don't care why they are like they are. screw um. If you don't have enough sense to question what your following and see its crazy then screw you. Put it to you this way when you look at stories in the bible like, "those of you who are free of sin cast the first stone" you will see that God wants you to use your brain. I believe the stupid ones get left behind. Screw um.
  5. Mr. Nameless

    Mr. Nameless New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,264
    Location:
    Coast of N.C.
    Thanks, now I don't have to type it.
  6. Trouble 45-70

    Trouble 45-70 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,703
    Location:
    NE Ar. W. of Black River
    Thanks Marlin T., that article explains so much. Best explanation of this murderous problem I have seen. By clicking on the site there is a sidebar on a 'Symposium on Islamic Terror and Sexual Mutilation'. It explained a lot about the unreported viciousness of the Mumbai massacre. I found Gutmanns discourse of the American penchant for combining ruthless in war with mercy leading to unexpectedly good outcomes. I had never thought of the US in this way but he is right. Some of the rest of the article was quite brutal but radical Islam is a brutal subject. Front Page Magazine is an unexpectedly informative read. I join Marlin T. in recommending it's articles.
  7. wpage

    wpage Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,482
    Good post. Interesting was the part where part of the psych is how to turn their evil like 9-11-01 into Bush/Mil did it. You could read the Koran for info insights. However the Bible is a better source for understanding clashing with the East.
  8. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,592
    Location:
    Australia
    the scariest part is the realisation that WE ( western nations) are encouraging them

    take a look at Hizb ut-Tahrir US

    the US arm of one of the most voilent sects of islam
    and estimated to be funded currently by the US taxpayer to 60% of its operational budget.

    Madeleine Gruen of The NYPD CI ( criminal intelligence division )

    has a great document on this that was rejected by the state of NY as it may cause "upset feelings" in the islamic community

    it was also rejected by the DHS for the same reasons and that it may be interpreted as "racial profiling"

    here is her documented study for the hudson institute on how these mutts operate

    oh by the way the Australian arm of these mutts had its boss 2IC and a few cohorts locked up for plotting a attack on our biggest military base here,

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 12, 2010
  9. Jim K

    Jim K New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,397
    I am not sure I agree about "political Islam." Islam does not really recognize politics or states or governments as we know them. There is only Islam and carrying out the will of God. Nation-states can be established in Islamic areas to carry out limited secular functions. "It is not a function of Islam to issue license plates," was the way a Moslem put it to me. But the state always is subordinate to the religion and must always be in harmony with it.

    I am a Catholic, and have studied the history of Catholicism through the Middle Ages. While the Church was never as rigid as Islam, the Medieval Church and modern Islam have a lot in common. One major difference is that Islam has no Pope. There is no single person who can effect change for Islam as many Popes did for the Church. And so far, there has been no Reformation to shake the foundations of Islam and cause a rethinking of its goals and ideas. In fact, it seems to be tending more toward rigidity and inwardness as time goes on. (And the Reformation was not a peaceful transition; it was the cause of bloody wars, oppression and violence, in which Protestants showed themselves just as willing and eager to kill "unbelievers" as any Spanish Inquisitor or Moslem Jihadist.)

    The Catholic Church left much of its medievalism behind; Islam is still in the sixth century, and we can expect a lot more problems before that changes.

    Jim
  10. Hurryin' Hoosier

    Hurryin' Hoosier New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    126
    Location:
    Columbus, Indiana
    So many targets. So little time.
  11. ampaterry

    ampaterry *TFF Admin Staff Chaplain* Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,214
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Channel 5 in Nashville just did a two part investigative report on the local Islamville (Muslims of the Americas) located just a few miles from my home here in West Tennessee.
    They talked about the film that is circulating about these Muslim camps here in the US.
    They talked about how the film depicts them as terrorist training camps.

    Then they 'exposed' all of those claims as false when they flew over the camp and saw nothing criminal going on.
    They also rode out there with the local sheriff, who assured them that he had never had a call on these people.
    They were allowed to drive into the compound, provided they did not talk to any of the Muslims that live there.

    White-wash, 100%.

    They did not even mention the FACT that the entrance to this place is guarded by two armed guards up at the highway that block EVERYONE from getting in - they do not even allow mail or any other delivery inside their area.
    I know this.
    I went there and saw it.
  12. red14

    red14 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,947
    Location:
    N FLA
    Mail them a letter. Isn't it against federal law to impede the mail? Wouldn't they have to allow a letter to arrive under penalty of federal law?
  13. Marlin T

    Marlin T Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,888
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Terry this sounds like it is a place that is modeled from some towns in Bosnia.
    I wonder if the place your talking about has it's own zip code/post office yet?

    This article has everything including the political aspects along with the links to America.

    http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=27321&t=The True Aims Of Bosnia's 'Operation Light'

    It's rather long, but filled with good information. I hope everybody reads it.

    Speaking of reading, thanks for the PDF Jack.
  14. ampaterry

    ampaterry *TFF Admin Staff Chaplain* Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,214
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    Marlin, you are right - this DOES sound like that!

    Red, they are there by mutual agreement -
    All of their mailboxes are out at the end of the county road which they have closed off to the public. A friend had a propane delivery to make out there, but the guard stopped him at the entrance.
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2010
  15. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,592
    Location:
    Australia
    I know what type of letter i'd be sending ..

    Marlin , Thank the NYPD for having clever cops

    pity no-one took them seriously eh

    jihad rap ? sheesh . fund raiseing for jihad using US residents as the funding source? and TAXES!!!

    i thought anything that aided or encouraged the enemy was a bust

    but with how its going lately i'm surprised there aint a federal tax to support jihad against you all

    i suppose that will be next
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Islam on the march taking on the main political parties in OZ Nov 16, 2010
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Dove Hunting Done Right NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT Jun 30, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Gun Store Famous for Political Signs Faces Backlash From Their Bank That Could Shut Them Down Jun 21, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Coalition of U.S. Muslim Brotherhood Groups Forms Voting Bloc/MB Political Party Apr 22, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Political Quiz Feb 3, 2014

Share This Page