Ruger LCP vs. Kahr P380

Discussion in 'Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers' started by Bubblehead, Jul 7, 2010.

  1. Bubblehead

    Bubblehead New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    480
    Location:
    Pioneer, CA
    I'm looking for a compact carry pistol and both the Ruger LCP and Kahr P380 meet my "size" requirements. The Kahr is almost twice the price of the Ruger and I've had no experience with either one.

    Can anyone help me understand the merits of each and why the Kahr might be worth the extra cost?

    I'm looking for something small. My other carry pistols are a compact 45 and a Glock 23.

    Thank you,

    John
  2. rglbegl

    rglbegl New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    531
    Location:
    Dana point CA
    I LOVE my Kahr.
    But for the price difference, I would go for the Ruger.

    The Kahr will be more accurate, it has a better barrel and better sights.
    The Kahr will be higher quality, with more attention to detail.
    I even think the Kahr has a better trigger.
    But the Ruger is a very solid, and very reliable weapon.

    Now if it were between a Ruger LCP and the Kahr PM9 . . .. no comparison. Kahr hands down.
    But every time there is a 380 discussion, someone will suggest the Kel-Tec.
    So lets see how many people jump in here to talk about a weapon that is illegal in California
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2010
  3. Bill DeShivs

    Bill DeShivs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,777
    Of the two choices, I would choose Keltec!
  4. Bubblehead

    Bubblehead New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    480
    Location:
    Pioneer, CA
    Bill, why Keltec. It wasn't even one of my choices. John
  5. rglbegl

    rglbegl New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    531
    Location:
    Dana point CA
    Kel-tec = Illegal in California.
    LCP = Illegal in California.


    Looks like it is the Kahr for you
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2010
  6. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
  7. rglbegl

    rglbegl New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    531
    Location:
    Dana point CA
    Let me say this again


    Kel-tec is ILLEGAL in California

    We are being of no help to this person by suggesting something that is not possible.
  8. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Dude, relax, I was typing my response when yours came in. I didn't see it. No need to yell about it.

    I'm sorry for your loss in that leftist state. Can you enlighten us as to why those are illegal there?

    thanks.
  9. rglbegl

    rglbegl New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    531
    Location:
    Dana point CA
    They have no external safety, nor do they pass the drop test.
    So Kel-Tec wont even attempt to make their guns legal here. (expensive process)
    Which sucks because I want that new 30 shot .22mag pistol.

    The LCP has similiar problems.
    But somehow the Kahr, with no external safety, is legal to own. (grandfathered in?)
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2010
  10. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Found on another forum - they are not legal due to a number of reasons: weren't submitted for safety tests, etc....whatever.

    the legal list of allowed hand guns in CA are here:

    http://certguns.doj.ca.gov/
  11. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Ahhhh. right. thanks.

    Thank God they have no external safety.
  12. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Yeah, I won't be able to touch that .22 with the 30 rd mag either, here in NY. Anything over 10 rds, not allowed. nice. :mad:
  13. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Rochester, NY

    Attached Files:

  14. Bubblehead

    Bubblehead New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Messages:
    480
    Location:
    Pioneer, CA
    The LCP is legal in California for Law Enforcement Officers. It is also legal for a "civilian" to purchase through the private party transfer process. I haven't checked into the Kel-Tec but I believe the same law applies. Here is the section of the California Firearms Law:

    The requirements for handguns to pass safety and functionality tests and to be listed in the Department of Justice’s official list of handguns certified as safe for sale in California do not apply to transactions involving the following:
    • Private party transfers of handguns occurring through a firearms dealer. (Penal Code § 12132(a).)

    So all I have to do is find an LEO who wants to sell their LCP or Kel-Tec and I'm in business.
  15. rglbegl

    rglbegl New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    531
    Location:
    Dana point CA
    Read the law again.
    You can only buy a gun that is grandfathered in from a private individual.
    Even if someone buys one in another state, and moves to Cali, they are not allowed to sell it to you. (unless you are a LEO)
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2010
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers Ruger Model LCR 9S Nov 10, 2014
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers ruger 9e vs s&w sd9ve Nov 10, 2014
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers Ruger SR40 or Glock G27 - Oct 1, 2014
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers 23 Different Rugers Sep 28, 2014
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers Pics of new Ruger MC Aug 26, 2014

Share This Page