1. Get Gear'd Up! Enter to WIN $1000 in gear!

    Please Click Here for full details and to enter. You will need to be registered and logged in to view the details and to participate.

    Thanks and good luck to everyone

Second Amendment Poll

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Don Buckbee, Nov 29, 2007.

  1. Don Buckbee

    Don Buckbee New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    712
    Location:
    Grayling, MI
  2. 300 H&H

    300 H&H Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    1,855
    Location:
    Iowa
    Don,
    great post!! everyone here should do this as soon as they can... the results so far... well I won't give it away. Just point and click and find out what the rest of the voters think. Thanks for bringing this here Don! Best reguards Kirk
  3. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,856
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    Done.

    Its a very impressive total percentage for we individuals !!!!
  4. AL MOUNT

    AL MOUNT Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,321
    Location:
    Cleaning my Thompson in The Foothills of the Ozark
    98% YES.......:D

    2% NO............:(

    I'll bet USA Today hates to see that...........:D
  5. Great post, Don, and my vote has been cast! It will be very interesting indeed to see how the Supreme Court rules on this case.
  6. rosierita

    rosierita Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,217
    Location:
    South Carolina
    okay ummmmm i TRIED to vote but the page wouldnt open for me! are ya'll busy clogging up the lines?! :rolleyes: i wanna vote!:(
  7. Nighthawk

    Nighthawk New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    3,330
    Location:
    South Central Texas
    I voted 98% in our favor
  8. glocknut

    glocknut New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    12,490
    Location:
    THE FORUM MASCOTT...
    You're a woman.... you can't vote?!!!! :D:D:D:D:D:D:D
    Go back to the kitchen and cook something up for us....

    Ducking for cover !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    mike
    gn
  9. dcd_enterprises

    dcd_enterprises New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,311
    Location:
    Wheatland, Iowa
    Are you trying to start a slaughter?!



    Anyway, done.
  10. Carl S

    Carl S New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Bunnell, FL
    Done! And it is still 98% in favor with 0% undecided.
  11. Northalius

    Northalius New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    35
    Location:
    Virginia
    I voted yes, of course.

    The 2nd Amendment starts out with: "A well regulated militia,..."

    So, We The People, need to form militias with orderly fashion, to prevent chaos. Good idea! :)

    Continuing on with the 2nd Amendment: "...being necessary to the security of a free state,"

    Thus showing the 2nd Amendment was talking about upholding each specific States' right to bear arms for the security of their freedom from tyranny; whether private or government, foreign or domestic. And "state" being mentioned in the 2nd Amendment is further proof that the Bill of Rights were originally intended for the States, as well as the federal government; not the federal government alone.

    Continuing on:

    "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

    Clearly proving that the private citizens, the people, are spoken of in the 2nd Amendment! Not any separate government paid for, and ran, military, like the National Guard.

    Clearly showing, also, that they, the founding fathers of this nation, were dead serious about government not infringing upon this great right of the people to keep and bear their guns.

    An armed mass of citizens will clearly make government think twice about attempting to forcefully rule over the people. The 2nd Amendment is great, because if all other Amendments are taken away, people still have the power in their hands to take them back, by force, if needed.

    No freedom of speech? No problem. I can shoot with my mouth shut, thank you very much. ;)

    Whoever ordered the ban of guns in Washington DC, should be jailed for treason against the free people of the United States of America, and treason against the U.S. Constitution, which clearly states that the right to bear arms for the people, shall not be infringed. Not that it might not, but SHALL not. A clear commandment, that was broken by whoever passed this corrupt law in Washington DC. They're criminals, plain and simple.
  12. Bruce FLinch

    Bruce FLinch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,015
    Location:
    Bay Point, Kali..aka Gun Point
    Yep! still 98% !
    USA toaday will prolly hide the results! :D
  13. rosierita

    rosierita Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,217
    Location:
    South Carolina
    :rolleyes: smarta$$!:D

    i still cant vote!:confused:
  14. armedandsafe

    armedandsafe Guest

    Very minor nit to pick, here. That should be State, rather than state. The difference is subtle but vast in meaning. State universally means the larger country (governmental entity,) while state means the smaller, integral parts of that larger State.

    Pops
  15. Crpdeth

    Crpdeth Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2002
    Messages:
    8,290
    Location:
    Location: Location
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
General Discussion A little thought on the second amendment.... Jul 3, 2014
General Discussion Obama and the Second Amendment Jan 13, 2009
General Discussion We lost a great actor and second amendment supporter today Apr 6, 2008
General Discussion Second Amendment Protection Act of 2007 Mar 6, 2007
General Discussion Second Phase ....... Dec 2, 2013

Share This Page