Senate to Ban Private Gun Sales

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by RunningOnMT, May 8, 2009.

  1. RunningOnMT

    RunningOnMT New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,720
    Location:
    Akron, Ohio
    Anti-Gun Senate to Ban Private Gun Sales

    Sens. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ), Jack Reed (D-RI) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) have joined Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and victims and family members of the Virginia Tech tragedy, to introduce legislation to eliminate the private transfers of firearms and close the nation's "gun show loophole."

    YOU ARE IRRATIONAL IF YOU SUPPORT PRIVATE GUN SALES
    "There is no rational reason to oppose closing the loophole. The reason it's still not closed is simple: the continuing power of the special interest gun lobby in Washington" Sen. Lautenberg said ignoring the Constitution.
    Click Here to Reject All Gun Bans and Fax All 99 Senators

    Lautenberg went on to add still more to the "90% Obama Mexican Gun Lie":
    "Thirty percent of the guns that go to Mexico are bought at gun shows." With NO supporting evidence Lautenberg continued, "We don't know whether they're bought from unlicensed dealers, but logic would say let's have some idea who it is that bought those guns and what their intentions might be."
    Lautenberg and the Gun Grabbers in the Senate are also lying about the Virginia Tech gunman who had a background check at a legal gun store to justify themselves. There were abundant warning signs that he posed a serious threat to the campus. Yet he was running loose because the gun check system failed.

    NO SUCH THING AS 'GUN SHOW LOOPHOLE'

    Independence Institute researcher David Kopel has written about the "gun show loophole," concluding that it is a myth: Says Kopel:
    "Despite what some media commentators have claimed, If a dealer sells a gun from a storefront, from a room in his home or from a table at a gun show, the rules are exactly the same: he can get authorization from the FBI for the sale only after the FBI runs its "instant" background check"
    CRIME GUNS DO NOT COME FROM GUN SHOWS

    The Bureau of Justice Statistics report entitled "Firearms Use by Offenders" found that less than one percent - 0.7%, to be exact - of guns used in crimes originated at gun shows.

    NICS: DEFACTO GUN REGISTRATION

    New York (D) Sens. Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand proposed computerized background checks be retained creating a de facto gun registration system and Lautenberg's Bill proposes private transactions be added to this registration system.

    LAUTENBERG'S MOTIVES

    Motives for eliminating gun shows are twofold:

    First, gun shows are a powerful tool in defeating gun control legislation.

    Second, eradicate the gun show and gun culture altogether.

    All that seems to be on the minds of the Anti-Gun Senators and at the offices of gun control extremists is figuring out how to exploit tragedy to erode and eventually destroy the right, and the means, of self-defense.

    Click Here to Reject All Gun Bans and Fax All 99 Senators

    Now the Anti-Gun Coalitions are trying to use tragic events to destroy gun shows and the right of all Americans to keep and bear arms to protect themselves under the law. They are attacking and hiding behind an Anti-Terrorist Agenda while getting political and financial support from:

    George Soros a Hungarian-born billionaire bank rolling efforts with his check book and spending more that $100 million to destroy the Constitution.

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein (CA) admitted that "guns would be banned and confiscated" if she could have her way.

    The United Nations actively pushes globalism seeking to disarm all Americans.

    We must Stop the Anti-Gun Coalition and get ready for the biggest gun control fight of the year from coast to coast. We can not do that without your support.

    Stand up against this attack! Stand up for the right to not only defend yourself, but to defend your family, your children, your friends, and your classmates!

    Click Here to Reject All Gun Bans and Fax All 99 Senators

    Like all other threats against our freedoms, we must rise and defeat this bill, slap it down hard.

    The legislation is cosponsored by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Charles Schumer (D-NY), John Kerry (D-MA), Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Carl Levin (D-MI), Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ).

    In order to stop Schumer, Kerry and Kennedy and there fellow gun-grabbers-we need to let the Congress know with thousands of faxes telling them to leave guns alone.

    Americans like you who understand what our Founding Fathers envisioned for our nation...and who are willing to fight to defend our Constitution and for what it stands.

    So please, help the Citizens Committee and me defeat those who wish to gut and trash the United States Constitution.

    Help me flood the U.S. Senate with a sea of FAXES big enough to drown each and every Senator willing to vote away the Second Amendment.

    Please, send your Donation and FAX TODAY!

    Click Here to Reject All Gun Bans and Fax All 99 Senators

    Keep calling your Senators today, toll free numbers include 1-877-851-6437 and 1-866-220-0044, or call toll 1-202-225-3121 AND REGISTER YOU'RE OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to take guns away!

    CALL PRESIDENT Obama, 202-456-1111 and 202-456-1414 expressing your disdain and ABSOLUTE REJECTION of all GUN BANS.

    DO NOT BE SILENCED - MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!

    NOTE: We need TENS OF THOUSANDS of faxes and PHONE CALLS and EMAILS delivered to ALL Senators right away!

    For our projects to be successful, we must count on the voluntary financial support from individuals like you who care.

    Your contribution of $20 or $25 is urgently needed today.

    Your donation for just $10 will help so much. If you can afford to send $50 or $100 or more it would truly be a godsend.

    Remember, protecting our freedom is not inexpensive.

    But then, it's impossible to put a price tag on freedom.

    CLICK HERE to DONATE NOW.
    The rights you save may be your own!


    Together, we can preserve the Constitutional rights our Founding Fathers intended our people to have forever.

    For more information about CCRKBA click here.

    Please let me know your decision right away. Thank you.

    Sincerely,

    Alan Gottlieb
    Chairman
    Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

    If you prefer to donate by check, please mail to:
    The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
    12500 NE Tenth Place
    Dept Code 2365
    Bellevue, Washington 98004

    https://secure.conservativedonations.com/ccrkba_fax_he/?a=2365
    Last edited: May 8, 2009
  2. pickenup

    pickenup Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2002
    Messages:
    6,858
    Location:
    Colorado Rocky Mountains
    But....but....BUT....the big "O" said he was going to leave gun laws alone.....
  3. Marlin T

    Marlin T Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    7,877
    Location:
    New Mexico
    Thanks for the article Running.

    He sure did say that, but the devil is in the details Pickenup. He didn’t say that he would veto such a bill if it was on his desk therefore effectively supporting such a bill.

    I bet those people at Handgun Control Inc ® or whatever it is called today are mad because they haven’t pasted any gun control measures yet.

    But back to SB 843, a newspaper, or even this site could fall under this definition. This could be a great way to shut down web sites that are not politically correct.

    (36) GUN SHOW- The term `gun show' means any event--

    `(A) at which 50 or more firearms are offered or exhibited for sale, transfer, or exchange, if 1 or more of the firearms has been shipped or transported in, or otherwise affects, interstate or foreign commerce; and

    `(B) at which--

    ‘’(i) not fewer than 20 percent of the exhibitors are firearm exhibitors;
    ‘’(ii) there are not fewer than 10 firearm exhibitors; or
    ‘’(iii) 50 or more firearms are offered for sale, transfer, or exchange.
  4. kerk

    kerk New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    118
    Always remember, they can law you down to 'one' .22 cal, single shot rifle, and limit you to '1' bullet, and still claim they are not violating the 2A.

    And now that I think about it, they don't even have to let you have a bullet. 2A doesn't say anything about ammo.

    Like MT's post said, you need to let your senators (especially the moderates, blue dogs, and the Rino's) know your opinion and that you tire of their endless, ongoing attempts to slowly disarm the American public under the guise of public safety.

    I wouldn't even bother with the co-sponsors, their minds are made up.

    Just as important, is our continued effort to educate young people on the importance of the 2A. I think we often over emphasize the value of SD against the bad guys, when the purpose of the 2A was for SD against tyranny.

    It's all we can do until 2010, when we vote them out.
  5. glocknut

    glocknut New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    12,490
    Location:
    THE FORUM MASCOTT...
    Yeah, the big "O" will leave us with a big "O" when he's done with us.... :eek::eek::rolleyes::rolleyes:

    mike
    gn
  6. wpage

    wpage Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,486
    Dont understand why Lautenberg D senator from NJ and Feinstien D senator Ca would care there are no gun shows in thier republics anyway...
  7. Jim K

    Jim K New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,397
    Don't let your guard down, but that bill is going nowhere. It's main purpose is to get money from the anti-gun gang to line the pockets of a couple of corrupt Senators.

    Still, we need to publicize those efforts, because it gives the lie to the Democrats' claims that they are not anti-gun.

    Jim
  8. hogger129

    hogger129 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    4,151
    Yeah just like he promised us hope and change, or how he wasn't going to support special interest groups and then turns around and has ACORN, and all the other things he promised to do and never did. I still want to see his birth certificate.
  9. hogger129

    hogger129 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    4,151
    Their lives suck so they have to do everything they can to make sure that everyone else's suck too. They are like the rest of the Democrats. They think they know what is best for everyone.
  10. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    17,600
    Location:
    Australia
    Bo Bo IS leaveing the gun laws alone , He has specialists to do that for him
  11. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    8,123
    Location:
    Louisiana
    I know its just a matter of time till they mount up an assult on guns. Look at health care and toyota. When they come i guarentee they are going to play for keeps. It will be a fight like no other.
  12. CampingJosh

    CampingJosh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,443
    Location:
    Indiana
    This "gun show loophole" thing isn't a Congressional issue, which is why nothing has happened. Interstate transactions by unlicensed individuals is already illegal; Congress has no authority over intrastate transactions (whether the members of Congress will admit it or not).
  13. Suicide*Ride

    Suicide*Ride New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,341
    Location:
    Golden, Colorado

    I agree Cyclone..... & I'm looking forward to the fight. ;)

    I can't afford to run for POTUS & figure there's no other way to be directly involved w/ righting the wrongs in our society. IMHO, it will start w/ a ban on all firearms & will progress into more..... MUCH MORE. :( :mad:

    SR
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2010
  14. bcj1755

    bcj1755 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    4,357
    Location:
    A wretched hive of scum and villiany
    Why don't they just ban criminals? Oh wait, that would be as effective as a gun ban:rolleyes:
  15. lockednloaded45

    lockednloaded45 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    54
    Location:
    southcentral MO

    LMAO, thats a good one )
  16. user

    user Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,016
    Location:
    Northern piedmont of Va. and Middle of Nowhere, We
    The United States lacks the legal power or authority to regulate intrastate transfers of personal property. All issues regarding the ownership, possession and use of firearms within a state can be regulated only by that state. U.S.Const.Amendment 10.
  17. graehaven

    graehaven Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,955
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    It's actually the PUNISHMENT of criminals that would be the most effective - but they won't do that either - because it's NOT about stopping crime - it IS about removing our fundamental right to defend ourselves.

    Money and power, that's what it's all about.
  18. Trouble 45-70

    Trouble 45-70 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,703
    Location:
    NE Ar. W. of Black River
    It is called subjugation.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum NJ Senate Committee Passes .22 Rifle Ban, Magazine Ban By 3 to 2 Vote May 7, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Idaho : Bill to punish gun-seizing cops passes with full senate support Feb 20, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Illinois Senate Panel OKs Ban On High-Capacity Ammo Clips May 21, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Senate Gun Bill May 9, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum After Senate setback, Obama quietly moving forward with gun regulation Apr 23, 2013

Share This Page