Hello: its been a while since I posted on this forum, but I'm interested in purchasing a snubnose revolver. I'm a federal police officer, and while I can't carry it as a backup, I'd like to purchase one for concealed carry. I already own a glock & wanted something different (i.e. small wheelgun). Based on my initial research, I was thinking of one of the following:
I am fairly ignorant to a lot of the nuances of revolvers & availability of different types of ammunition. I have heard that .32 magnum isn't a common round & that the S&W 432 is discontinued, which may take that from the running. How about the others? Thanks so much!
I would go 640 because of the enclosed hammer. Its personal, but as a back up I would value the enclosed hammer. Less to tangle in my pocket. I wouldn't let the DA only bother me because it would be for short range only. Long ago I carried what I think was a 42. Excellent as a pocket gun.
sound advice the 640 is a great choice. stay away from the 32 magnum why choose a 32 when on the same frame you can have a 38 or 357 magnum also as good as the light weight alloy guns feel they do not absorb the recoil as well as a heavier gun would. while you listed all smith and wesson models ( i'll save my anti-smith rant for another thread) there are other options the ruger sp101 or check out a taurus lots of models to choose from and every bit as good as a smith and wesson in my opinion
Even though the 640 is DA only, it is easy to stage. Staging is worse than useless at close range but if you want/need to take a longer shot it's nice to know if the cylinders break evenly or not.
How about the S&W 442? I like the lightweight frame, blued finish & especially the price. Seems to be a decent gun for the money. Has anyone fired one of these or had experience with the 442? By the way, thanks so much for all the help so far!
The 442 is a great gun, though I don't have any extensive personal experience with it.
I own a 637 Airweight, great gun. Had the choice of this, the 642 with an enclosed hammer, or the 638 (?) with a shrouded hammer. I went with the 637 because I like the looks of a traditional revolver. Plus, the super light and precise trigger pull in SA is great at the range!
If you're carrying it in a pocket, one of the enclosed hammer versions might be the way to go. I usually carry mine in a holster and snags don't really seem to be an issue.
Plus, they don't look half bad either.
Thanks for helping to keep our country safe.
.
.
.
640! It's reduced 'tangle-factor' would really carry weight in an emergency situation. However, since you're a 'fed', you might want to consider asking some of your fellows for their insight. After all, their comments are probably from a point of reference that is similar to yours.
I carry the #642 with Crimson Trace laser grip. This is a perfect pocket carry, everyday, anytime. I have gotten to be a dam good shot with it too so for a smaller frame like myself @ 160pounds its perfect.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
The Firearms Forum
2.2M posts
71K members
Since 2003
A forum community dedicated to all firearm owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, hunting, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!