so your the first nation in history to lose a ambassadore and no war ?

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by jack404, Sep 12, 2012.

  1. WHSmithIV

    WHSmithIV Well-Known Member

    May 3, 2012
    Moore, Idaho
    I don't think it will be Armageddon Jack, it will be nasty and bad for sure. Islam will lose though. Even the Chinese will take a side against Islam.
  2. WHSmithIV

    WHSmithIV Well-Known Member

    May 3, 2012
    Moore, Idaho
    Jack, the obozo goons will never do such a thing - you know it, I know it and all these brainwashed liberals would scream against it. The killing of 3 or 4 Americans doesn't phase these idiots - even if it is an Ambassador. But, when the attack happens here like 9/11 did the entire country gets outraged and it's nuke 'em, nuke 'em, nuke 'em.

    Look what happened in the 70's with the Iran take over of the Tehran Embassy and the people there being held hostage so long - nothing. Jimmy Carter was president. He did though authorize a strike to get them out and the choppers crashed (or were shot down) - then he wish washed around and did nothing.

    The last Democrat president this country had who had balls was JFK. That was before the party went so far left as to start sticking their heads up their asses.

    The only legal way we can get organized is to vote the s.o.b's out. It would have to get much worse here to create something like a civil war - and if that ever happens in the US it would become the bloodiest civil war the world had ever seen. Also you'd find the jackals invading to capitalize on the opportunity to do so. I guess then we'd all end up speaking Chinese since the Arabs don't have the guts or intelligence to get that organized. Even Russia is afraid of China. As a country, the USA would cease to exist.

  3. Millwright

    Millwright Well-Known Member

    Jun 30, 2005

    I gotta agree with you ! But reports have our President sending 50 marines into Libya to deal with the situation. Might just as well shove them into a blast furnace, IMO. Of course, had President Obama, (according to several reports) bothered to attend his security briefings (last attended 9/5) , he would know this.

    Then there's the inconvenient fact the Egyptian government knew in advance of the attack on our embassy. It was public knowledge. Yet a government recipient of several billions of our aid and advanced military technology failed to notify our embassy or government of the planned raid. And all this just "happened" to occur on 9/11 ?

    We don't need 50 marines ! We need a MEF and some serious support all these long shore governments know we'll use. Alas, signals of this sort of truculence have to come from the White House - and they won't ! In former times and other administrations an assault upon an embassy would be met with serious international repercussions, as it should be. The sanctity of an embassy is the cornerstone of diplomacy. Without embassies foreign and native citizens haven't an avenue to pass into other nations. The USG would be entirely justified in ousting all guest Libyans resident within our borders . Might be interesting to see how that would play out . >MW
  4. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    seen the ROE's? no they are there to protect your folks and exit only , they cannot had loaded weapons until ordered ( i hope thats given befiore they land but i fear it'll be another iraq green zone type farce)

    you need to get all your folks out stop helping them and get ready for whats to come
  5. WHSmithIV

    WHSmithIV Well-Known Member

    May 3, 2012
    Moore, Idaho
    They're going to be real good at protecting our folks and getting them out with empty weapons. The sheer stupidity of this current government of ours is just plain mind boggling. I suppose these 50 marines are coming in by sailboat also. Should have an aircraft carrier off the coast scaring the crap out of that country with really low level supersonic booms while the marines loaded to the teeth pull the US folks out to the carrier. Then leave them at it to continue killing each other.
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2012
  6. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Dec 16, 2008
    Well at least the media is all over this news this morning.

    Now bozo will have a decission to make.

    Angry Americans on one side vs his homo muslim brothers on the other side.

    Decessions decessions.

    Oh and there is an election coming up too.
  7. Gun Geezer

    Gun Geezer Well-Known Member

    Oct 5, 2009
    Central Florida
    There is no way we could afford to engage in another war in Libya, at least the kind we have been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. Surgical attacks are no way to demoralize the population. Without the support of civilians, Al Quada and the Taliban would have no safe haven. They only survive because they scare the locals more than we do. A mile of sterile land surrounding the embassy would scare the bejeezus out of anyone with half a brain and serve as a warning against future riots. They like any other bad boys, need to know there will be consequences, deadly ones.
  8. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    take the gloves off , NO ROE;'s

    only advance to contact

    and close and destroy the enemy

    by any means
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr National weather service Oct 22, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr The Savage Nation may have just been taken out. Sep 26, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Nationalism Aug 25, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr The Savage Nation Aug 17, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Crabby Gabby Upset by Hurtful Comments for not Saluting the National Anthem Aug 16, 2016