Sui Juris Info.....

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by Shizamus, Jul 4, 2003.

  1. Shizamus

    Shizamus New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    888
    Location:
    Vermont
    by Pamela

    How to Respond to Contempt in the Courtroom

    Here it is - EVERYONE should keep this - it could save you - it WORKS,
    we have used it in court many times and if used properly it will back a
    raging dragon judge right back down in his chair docile....... believe me
    it is not easy to do that ..... "KNOW RIGHTS OR NO RIGHTS" William Mayhar
    How to Respond to Contempt of Court, Judicial Attack

    We cringe for people going into court, dealing with the "sons of
    vipers, offspring of serpents" in these outlaw courts today. So many people
    write to us and call us, as they are being rendered in the money machine
    every day, liquidated to the Funding Streams for the elite. The rendering
    is in the PROCESS and most people do not have experience to understand or
    recognize corrupt process when they are in the middle of
    it.

    Attorneys do - they created it and don't let everyone in on the "secret"
    (wink wink) while you and your children are destroyed.
    To help all the people in courts right now who are discovering Sui Juris
    process and going in without attorneys, they need to know what to say
    when the judge turns into a raging dragon because they dared to ask a
    question or try to make the record, and to help keep from being arrested.
    These tools in particular are used and shared with many thanks to our friends
    Milt and Darlene Mitcheck, who were the researchers behind the "Vultures"
    compilations that exposed the false judicial oaths in Oregon in
    September 2001, Research that can be also found at our website
    www.avoiceforchildren.com <http://www.avoiceforchildren.com> .

    If you know the right words, they back down right now - they may still
    have you arrested, but you have said the right words on the record to
    descredit him in his contemptuous acts against you, and you will use this
    record in any appeal or future hearings as you go. The main thing is you
    DISCREDIT HIM and IMPEACH HIM IN HIS OWN COURTROOM if you say the right
    things. This can be used in any court in any setting, at any level, all the
    same basic process. I think in any country, with slight variations.

    Sui Juris process is simple and common law, as "any reasonable people would
    understand" and bridges all forms of courts or dealing with public
    authorities. One of the main TOOLS they use to arrest you in a courtroom is
    "CONTEMPT OF COURT". Contempt is an instant six months in jail or a year
    sentence, potentially that is what you face. They use this for any or no
    reason,
    mainly for intimidation, and this is where they will (have already)
    use a stun belt or gun on a defendant who "irritates" the court asking for
    our rights.

    When they do this to you, and it happens so fast it makes your head
    spin, if you have this written down, and can keep your wits about you
    enough to remember to say it, (you should practice it ! It is THAT important !)
    here is what you say: "IS THAT CIVIL CONTEMPT OR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT JUDGE?"
    (You wait for a response on the record - do not talk until he answers and
    if they pause this
    LONG pause is on the record that he cannot answer you - the silence of
    a witness answering a question is an admission of truth in a court record
    and the longer the pause the better.

    All you want on the record is to make them COMMIT and then you go on, and
    now you have them caught in the permanent record)

    If he says "CRIMINAL CONTEMPT" -
    you say "WHO MAKES THE CLAIM, WHAT IS THE CRIME AND WHO IS THE
    INJURED PARTY?" and wait again as long as it takes for him to say something.

    If he says "CIVIL CONTEMPT" you say "WHERE IS THE CONTRACT BETWEEN
    ME AND YOU? I DON'T AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT", JUDGE.
    NOW you have him acting CRIMINALLY OUTSIDE OF ANY LAWFUL JURISDICTION
    AND OUT OF IMMUNITY in his own courtroom on the record and heres why. In
    civil court, EVERYTHING is a CONTRACT and nothing can be done that is not a
    form of a contract. And ONLY HUMANS CAN LAWFULY CONTRACT. Every citation,
    money exchange, order, anything at all is an exchange - a contract - between
    two humans. The constitution is a contract with the Children of a Creator
    with Inherent Rights and the Constitutionally Sovereign People in the
    state, bonded by the JUDICIAL OATH - their contract.

    Anyway, when you say to him "I don't agree to the terms of the contract" he
    KNOWS he does not have a contract with you and if you have committed no
    crime he has no authority to arrest you or even be conducting the hearing -
    he is OUT of his lawful jurisdiction and OUT of his IMMUNITY.

    Now, if he says "CRIMINAL CONTEMPT", like one judge did to me, judge
    Robert Walberg, with no lawful oath by the way, he made a FOOL of himself !
    He said "IF YOU ASK THAT AGAIN I AM HOLDING YOU IN CONTEMPT OF COURT"
    I said "IS THAT CRIMINAL OR CIVIL CONTEMPT WALBERG?" and he raged and said
    CRIMINAL'.
    I said "WHAT CRIME HAVE I COMMITTED AND WHO MAKES THE CLAIM? WHO IS
    THE
    INJURED PARTY?' He went nuts and started yelling "THE STATE OF OREGON",
    "THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM", "THE COURT"..... I said "YOU KNOW THAT ONLY A HUMAN
    CAN MAKE A CLAIM AND THERE IS NO CRIME AND NO INJURED PARTY - YOU
    KNOW THAT
    THE STATE OF OREGON CANNOT MAKE A CLAIM" he backed down and sat there red
    faced (he had already arrested me about three times for speaking before
    this contempt attempt) and it shut him down.

    This was on the third day of the battle in his courtroom/sham jury trial
    last January - so after this confrontation backed him down he sat WAY
    BACK in his chair for three hours and let me make the record, while the
    jury waited in the back. MAKING THE RECORD WAS MY ONLY GOAL ANYWAY TO
    UPDATE THE RECORD IN OUR CASE.

    Unfortunately for us, the juries do not
    understand anything at all, and these confrontations scare them, so all the
    knowledge of court process and higher law goes right over their heads and
    they do EXACTLY what the judge LETS them do by the way he manipulates the
    instructions. This judge held his finger to his upper lip and looked like a
    cadaver for three hours, listening to the record of the crimes of our
    evidence against the state and his own treason as I outlined what has
    happened.
    That is how you make the Record.

    You have to use another trick called
    "OFFER OF PROOF". When they fight you and attack you, and rage, and
    say you cant say anything in front of the jury, and the DA interrupt
    literally EVERY sentence to stop you from speaking for days (I have gone
    through this !)...
    you tell the judge "I AM GOING TO MAKE AN OFFER OF PROOF FOR MY
    APPEAL". He sometimes will go in the back room altogether and leave the
    record on, or he will sit way back and listen while you make the record of
    your facts without the jury present.

    Another trick process word is "OFFER INTO
    EVIDENCE" they will let you go around for days and be denied because you
    don't say it
    that way ..... they are insane, but if you do use their words they know
    that they have to acknowledge that this is their process and they use it so
    you have
    to be able to use it too.

    Another important phrase to use is RUSH TO JUDGEMENT. After going around
    with them to a certain point and being blocked at all points, you say 'ARE YOU
    TRYING TO RUSH ME TO JUDGEMENT?" WOW - it
    works - boy they sit back so fast and shut up you would not believe - you
    would think they were shot -supposedly four times in a hearing saying that
    gets a reversal, but with us they don't give us anything, so I am not sure.
    But it is an important TOOL, you say this and it means they are preventing
    you from putting on your evidence as a lawful court and judicial due process
    requires, and for you to say this as they are doing it is like shooting
    them in their chair.

    I hope people will write these things down in front of
    them when they are terrified in court - everyone is terrified in the court,
    even the
    attorneys, especially when you are bringing truth of this magnitude in
    there - we say where the truth meets the lie there is fallout - like a
    neutron bomb,
    you definitely stir up the hornest nest when you speak the truth in their
    courtrooms.

    The rest of the Process for the People to Access the Courts is in the
    book we wrote. We learned these tools more recently and they are an
    "addition" to the information in the Sui Juris Book. This is what REALLY
    happens when you are in there, not what we think will happen or hope will
    happen.
    And learning these tools, you are prepared to meet this present evil face
    to face.

    If you are not in court, save this information and pass it on to
    friends who need it ...

    pamela gaston
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Pro-Crime Jurisdictions Aug 13, 2008
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Old news or new info? Aug 21, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum CNN - constant bad info about gun laws Apr 10, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Arm yourself with information Dec 17, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum California-important info Aug 11, 2012

Share This Page